Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edith Cowan University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Building 21, Room 21.423, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 25;15(2):203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020203.
The protective features that families and wider social relationships can have are required to meet the demands of life in contemporary Western societies. Choice and detraditionalization, however; impede this source of solidarity. Family Group Conferencing (FGC) and other life-world led interventions have the potential to strengthen primary groups. This paper explores the need for such a social intervention, using insights from sociological and philosophical theories and empirical findings from a case study of the research project 'FGC in mental health'. This need is understandable considering the weakening of kin ties, the poor qualities of state agencies to mobilise self-care and informal care, its capacity to produce a shift of power from public to private spheres and its capacity to mitigate the co-isolation of individuals, families and communities. A life-world led intervention like FGC with a specific and modest ambition contributes to small-scale solidarity. This ambition is not inclined to establish a broad social cohesion within society but to restore; in terms of the German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk; immunity (protection) and solidarity in primary groups, and consequently, resolve issues with those (family, neighbours, colleagues) who share a sphere (a situation, a process, a fate).
家庭和更广泛的社会关系所具有的保护功能,是满足当代西方社会生活需求的必要条件。然而,选择和去传统化却阻碍了这种团结的来源。家庭小组会议(FGC)和其他以生活世界为导向的干预措施有可能增强主要群体。本文利用社会学和哲学理论的见解以及“心理健康中的 FGC”研究项目的案例研究中的经验发现,探讨了这种社会干预的必要性。考虑到亲属关系的削弱、国家机构动员自我护理和非正式护理的能力差、将权力从公共领域转移到私人领域的能力以及减轻个人、家庭和社区的共同孤立的能力,这种社会干预是有必要的。像 FGC 这样以生活世界为导向的干预措施,具有特定而适度的目标,有助于小规模的团结。这种目标不是倾向于在社会内部建立广泛的社会凝聚力,而是恢复(用德国哲学家彼得·斯洛特戴克的话说)主要群体的免疫力(保护)和团结,从而解决与那些(家庭、邻居、同事)共享一个领域(一种情况、一个过程、一个命运)的人的问题。