• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团体图式疗法评定量表修订版的编制与心理测量学评估

The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Group Schema Therapy Rating Scale - Revised.

作者信息

Bastick Emily, Bot Suili, Verhagen Simone J W, Zarbock Gerhard, Farrell Joan, Brand-de Wilde Odette, Arntz Arnoud, Lee Christopher William

机构信息

Murdoch University,Murdoch,Western Australia.

Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2018 Sep;46(5):601-618. doi: 10.1017/S1352465817000741. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1017/S1352465817000741
PMID:29370876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent research has supported the efficacy of schema therapy as a treatment for personality disorders. A group format has been developed (group schema therapy; GST), which has been suggested to improve both the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the treatment.

AIMS

Efficacy studies of GST need to assess treatment fidelity. The aims of the present study were to improve, describe and evaluate a fidelity measure for GST, the Group Schema Therapy Rating Scale - Revised (GSTRS-R).

METHOD

Following a pilot study on an initial version of the scale (GSTRS), items were revised and guidelines were modified in order to improve the reliability of the scale. Students highly experienced with the scale rated recorded GST therapy sessions using the GSTRS-R in addition to a group cohesion measure, the Harvard Community Health Plan Group Cohesiveness Scale - II (GCS-II). The scores were used to assess internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the scores on the GSTRS-R with the GCS-II.

RESULTS

The GSTRS-R displayed substantial internal consistency and inter-rater reliability, and adequate discriminate validity, evidenced by a weak positive correlation with the GCS-II.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the GSTRS-R is a reliable tool that may be useful for evaluating therapist fidelity to GST model, and assisting GST training and supervision. Initial validity was supported by a weak association with GCS-II, indicating that although associated with cohesiveness, the instrument also assesses factors specific to GST. Limitations are discussed.

摘要

背景

近期研究支持了图式疗法作为人格障碍治疗方法的有效性。一种团体形式已被开发出来(团体图式疗法;GST),有人认为这种形式能提高治疗的临床效果和成本效益。

目的

GST的疗效研究需要评估治疗的保真度。本研究的目的是改进、描述和评估一种用于GST的保真度测量工具,即修订后的团体图式疗法评定量表(GSTRS-R)。

方法

在对量表的初始版本(GSTRS)进行预试验后,对条目进行了修订,并修改了指南,以提高量表的信度。对该量表有丰富经验的学生除了使用团体凝聚力测量工具哈佛社区健康计划团体凝聚力量表-II(GCS-II)外,还使用GSTRS-R对录制的GST治疗课程进行评分。这些分数用于评估内部一致性和评分者间信度。通过比较GSTRS-R与GCS-II的分数来评估区分效度。

结果

GSTRS-R显示出较高的内部一致性和评分者间信度,以及足够的区分效度,与GCS-II的弱正相关证明了这一点。

结论

总体而言,GSTRS-R是一种可靠的工具,可能有助于评估治疗师对GST模型的保真度,并辅助GST培训和监督。与GCS-II的弱关联支持了初始效度,表明该工具虽然与凝聚力相关,但也评估了GST特有的因素。文中讨论了其局限性。

相似文献

1
The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Group Schema Therapy Rating Scale - Revised.团体图式疗法评定量表修订版的编制与心理测量学评估
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2018 Sep;46(5):601-618. doi: 10.1017/S1352465817000741. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
2
Design of an RCT on cost-effectiveness of group schema therapy versus individual schema therapy for patients with Cluster-C personality disorder: the QUEST-CLC study protocol.一项关于团体图式治疗与个体图式治疗对 Cluster-C 型人格障碍患者成本效益的 RCT 设计:QUEST-CLC 研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 8;22(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04248-9.
3
Group schema therapy for personality disorders: A pilot study for implementation in acute psychiatric in-patient settings.团体模式治疗人格障碍:在急性精神科住院环境中实施的初步研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jul;253:9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.093. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
4
Reliability and validity of the short Schema Mode Inventory (SMI).短式心理模式量表(SMI)的信度和效度。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010 Jul;38(4):437-58. doi: 10.1017/S1352465810000226. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
Assessing alliance ruptures and resolutions: Reliability and validity of the Collaborative Interactions Scale-revised version.评估联盟破裂与解决:合作互动量表修订版的信度和效度。
Psychother Res. 2019 Apr;29(3):279-292. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1414331. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
6
Assessing therapist adherence to recovery-focused cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis delivered by telephone with support from a self-help guide: psychometric evaluations of a new fidelity scale.评估治疗师在自助指南支持下通过电话提供的针对精神病的以康复为重点的认知行为疗法的依从性:一种新的保真度量表的心理测量评估。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 Jul;42(4):435-51. doi: 10.1017/S135246581300026X. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
7
Group schema therapy for patients with cluster-C personality disorders: A case study on avoidant personality disorder.团体图式治疗对群 C 型人格障碍患者的应用:以回避型人格障碍为例的案例研究。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 May;77(5):1233-1248. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23118. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the Schema Mode Inventory (SMI).丹麦版图式模式量表(SMI)的信度和效度。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Mar;28(3):e19-26. doi: 10.1037/pas0000154. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
Effectiveness of Day Treatment Group Schema Therapy for Personality Disorders: A Multiple Baseline Single-Case Study.《团体模式治疗对人格障碍的疗效:一项多项基线单病例研究》。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Mar-Apr;31(2):e2964. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2964.
10
Group schema therapy for cluster-C personality disorders: A multicentre open pilot study.团体图式治疗对 C 群人格障碍:一项多中心开放性先导研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(6):1279-1302. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2903. Epub 2023 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of an RCT on cost-effectiveness of group schema therapy versus individual schema therapy for patients with Cluster-C personality disorder: the QUEST-CLC study protocol.一项关于团体图式治疗与个体图式治疗对 Cluster-C 型人格障碍患者成本效益的 RCT 设计:QUEST-CLC 研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 8;22(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04248-9.