Murphy Patrick B, Hart Nicholas
Lane Fox Respiratory Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London.
Lane Fox Respiratory Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2018 Mar;54(3):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic respiratory failure have high levels of morbidity and mortality. The clinical efficacy of long term home oxygen therapy has been well documented in this patient group but despite the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) during acute decompensated respiratory failure the addition of home NIV has been associated with equivocal results. The physiological efficacy of home NIV to improve gas exchange in chronic stable hypercapnic respiratory failure has been proven in small studies but larger clinical trials failed to translate this into clinical efficacy. Criticisms of early clinical trials include the use of marginally hypercapnic patients and failure to demonstrate effective delivery of home NIV. When considering recent trial data it is important to clearly evaluate the patient phenotype and timing and delivery of NIV. Recent data supports the delivery of home NIV in patients with chronic hypercapnia (PaCO>7kPa or 50mmHg) and the frequent or infrequent exacerbator phenotype. Importantly in the frequent exacerbator the timing of the assessment needs to be in the recovery phase, 2-4 weeks after resolution of acute acidosis, to delineate transient from persistent hypercapnia. In patient with persistent hypercapnia NIV must be titrated to achieve control of sleep disordered breathing with the aim of improving daytime respiratory failure. Furthermore there are observational data to support the use of home positive airway pressure therapy (NIV or continuous positive airway pressure; CPAP) in patients with COPD and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) both with and without hypercapnia.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和慢性呼吸衰竭患者的发病率和死亡率很高。长期家庭氧疗在该患者群体中的临床疗效已有充分记录,但尽管无创通气(NIV)在急性失代偿性呼吸衰竭中有效,但家庭NIV的附加作用结果却不明确。小型研究已证实家庭NIV在改善慢性稳定型高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭气体交换方面的生理疗效,但大型临床试验未能将其转化为临床疗效。早期临床试验受到的批评包括使用轻度高碳酸血症患者以及未能证明家庭NIV的有效实施。在考虑近期试验数据时,明确评估患者表型以及NIV的时机和实施情况非常重要。近期数据支持对慢性高碳酸血症(动脉血二氧化碳分压>7kPa或50mmHg)患者以及频繁或不频繁加重型表型患者实施家庭NIV。重要的是,对于频繁加重型患者,评估时机应在恢复阶段,即急性酸中毒缓解后2 - 4周,以区分短暂性与持续性高碳酸血症。对于持续性高碳酸血症患者,必须调整NIV以控制睡眠呼吸紊乱,目的是改善日间呼吸衰竭。此外,有观察数据支持对患有COPD和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)且伴有或不伴有高碳酸血症的患者使用家庭气道正压通气治疗(NIV或持续气道正压通气;CPAP)。