Suppr超能文献

一项前后对照的混合方法研究,旨在确定一项全国性谵妄临床护理标准对改善澳大利亚医院谵妄患者诊断和护理的有效性:一项研究方案。

Controlled pre-post, mixed-methods study to determine the effectiveness of a national delirium clinical care standard to improve the diagnosis and care of patients with delirium in Australian hospitals: a protocol.

作者信息

Mumford Virginia, Kulh Mary Ann, Hughes Clifford, Braithwaite Jeffrey, Westbrook Johanna

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.

Medical School, Australian National University, Calvary Public Hospital, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 24;8(1):e019423. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019423.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Delirium, an acute confusional state, affects up to 29% of acute inpatients aged 65 years and over. The Australian Delirium Clinical Care Standard (the Standard) contains evidence-based, multicomponent interventions, to identify and reduce delirium. This study aims to: (1) conduct a controlled, before-and-after study to assess the clinical effectiveness of the Standard to improve diagnosis and treatment of delirium; (2) conduct a cost-effectiveness study of implementing the Standard and (3) evaluate the implementation process.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study will use a controlled, preimplementation and postimplementation mixed-methods study design, including: medical record reviews, activity-based costing analysis and interviews with staff, patients and their family members. The study population will comprise patients 65 years and over, admitted to surgical, medical and intensive care wards in four intervention hospitals and one control hospital. The primary clinical outcome will be the incidence of delirium. Secondary outcomes include: length of stay, severity and duration of delirium, inhospital mortality rates, readmission rates and use of psychotropic drugs. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated through activity-based costing analysis and outcome data, and the implementation process appraised through the qualitative results.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been received for two hospitals. Additional hospitals have been identified and ethics applications will be submitted once the tools in the pilot study have been tested.The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented to national and international conferences. Results seminars will provide a quality feedback mechanism for staff and health policy bodies.

摘要

引言

谵妄是一种急性意识混乱状态,影响高达29%的65岁及以上急性住院患者。《澳大利亚谵妄临床护理标准》(该标准)包含基于证据的多成分干预措施,以识别和减少谵妄。本研究旨在:(1)进行一项对照前后研究,以评估该标准对改善谵妄诊断和治疗的临床效果;(2)对实施该标准进行成本效益研究;(3)评估实施过程。

方法与分析

该研究将采用对照、实施前和实施后的混合方法研究设计,包括:病历审查、基于活动的成本分析以及对工作人员、患者及其家属的访谈。研究人群将包括65岁及以上入住四家干预医院和一家对照医院的外科、内科和重症监护病房的患者。主要临床结局将是谵妄的发生率。次要结局包括:住院时间、谵妄的严重程度和持续时间、住院死亡率、再入院率以及精神药物的使用。成本效益将通过基于活动的成本分析和结局数据进行评估,实施过程将通过定性结果进行评估。

伦理与传播

两家医院已获得伦理批准。已确定了其他医院,一旦试点研究中的工具经过测试,将提交伦理申请。研究结果将提交至同行评审期刊发表,并在国内和国际会议上展示。结果研讨会将为工作人员和卫生政策机构提供质量反馈机制。

相似文献

8
Improving delirium care in the intensive care unit: the design of a pragmatic study.
Trials. 2011 Jun 6;12:139. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-139.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Delirium, Dementia, and Decline.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):212-213. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3812.
3
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 11;3(3):CD005563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005563.pub3.
4
What does delirium cost? An economic evaluation of hyperactive delirium.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jan;49(1):52-8. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0871-6. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer.
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 8;12:141. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0141-2.
8
Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long-term care.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31(1):CD009537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009537.pub2.
9
New horizons in the pathogenesis, assessment and management of delirium.
Age Ageing. 2013 Nov;42(6):667-74. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft148. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
10
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验