Allied Health, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
Academic & Research Collaborative in Health (Northern ARCH), School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e034121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034121.
A new healthcare standard (Standard 5: Comprehensive Care) has been introduced by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Standard 5 advocates for organisational leadership to develop and maintain systems and processes to deliver patient-centred comprehensive care plans that include appropriate screening to identify and mitigate risks associated with hospitalisation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a comprehensive care and risk evaluation (Comprehensive Assessment and Risk Evaluation (CARE)) plan to reduce hospital acquired complications (HACs) in an Australian hospital network.
This study will comprise a mixed-method pre and post implementation concurrent triangulation evaluation design. The primary clinical outcome will assess the reduction of routinely reported HACs (pressure care and falls), selected based on the likely reliability of routinely collected data prior to implementation. Secondary clinical outcomes will include length of stay and activity-based costing data for each episode, in-hospital mortality, expected and unplanned readmissions within 28 days, compliance with CARE plan completion and referrals for at risk patients, staff satisfaction, patient satisfaction and barriers and enablers to implementation. We expect that the incidence of other HACs (malnutrition, delirium, violence and aggression, and suicide and self-harm) may increase as routine methods for assessing risk were not in place prior to implementation of the CARE plan. We will therefore collect data on incidence of these HACs as tertiary outcomes. Our primary cost-effectiveness outcome will be calculation of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Ethics approval has been received from Northern Health Low Risk Ethics Committee. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.
澳大利亚安全与质量卫生保健委员会推出了一项新的医疗保健标准(标准 5:全面护理)。标准 5 主张组织领导层制定和维护系统和流程,以提供以患者为中心的全面护理计划,其中包括适当的筛查,以识别和减轻与住院相关的风险。本研究的目的是评估全面护理和风险评估(综合评估和风险评估(CARE))计划在减少澳大利亚医院网络中获得性医院并发症(HACs)方面的有效性和成本效益。
本研究将包括混合方法的前后实施同时三角评估设计。主要临床结果将评估常规报告的 HACs(压力护理和跌倒)的减少,这些 HACs是根据实施前常规收集数据的可靠性选择的。次要临床结果将包括每个病例的住院时间和基于活动的成本数据、院内死亡率、28 天内预期和计划外再入院、CARE 计划完成和高危患者转介的依从性、员工满意度、患者满意度以及实施的障碍和促进因素。我们预计,由于在实施 CARE 计划之前没有评估风险的常规方法,其他 HACs(营养不良、谵妄、暴力和攻击以及自杀和自残)的发生率可能会增加。因此,我们将作为三级结果收集这些 HACs 的发生率数据。我们的主要成本效益结果将是计算增量成本效益比。
已从北部卫生低风险伦理委员会获得伦理批准。本研究的结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在会议上发表。