Suppr超能文献

评价综合护理计划在减少澳大利亚某医院获得性并发症方面的有效性:一项混合方法预实施和后实施研究的方案。

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a comprehensive care plan to reduce hospital acquired complications in an Australian hospital: protocol for a mixed-method preimplementation and postimplementation study.

机构信息

Allied Health, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia

Academic & Research Collaborative in Health (Northern ARCH), School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e034121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034121.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A new healthcare standard (Standard 5: Comprehensive Care) has been introduced by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Standard 5 advocates for organisational leadership to develop and maintain systems and processes to deliver patient-centred comprehensive care plans that include appropriate screening to identify and mitigate risks associated with hospitalisation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a comprehensive care and risk evaluation (Comprehensive Assessment and Risk Evaluation (CARE)) plan to reduce hospital acquired complications (HACs) in an Australian hospital network.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will comprise a mixed-method pre and post implementation concurrent triangulation evaluation design. The primary clinical outcome will assess the reduction of routinely reported HACs (pressure care and falls), selected based on the likely reliability of routinely collected data prior to implementation. Secondary clinical outcomes will include length of stay and activity-based costing data for each episode, in-hospital mortality, expected and unplanned readmissions within 28 days, compliance with CARE plan completion and referrals for at risk patients, staff satisfaction, patient satisfaction and barriers and enablers to implementation. We expect that the incidence of other HACs (malnutrition, delirium, violence and aggression, and suicide and self-harm) may increase as routine methods for assessing risk were not in place prior to implementation of the CARE plan. We will therefore collect data on incidence of these HACs as tertiary outcomes. Our primary cost-effectiveness outcome will be calculation of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been received from Northern Health Low Risk Ethics Committee. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

摘要

简介

澳大利亚安全与质量卫生保健委员会推出了一项新的医疗保健标准(标准 5:全面护理)。标准 5 主张组织领导层制定和维护系统和流程,以提供以患者为中心的全面护理计划,其中包括适当的筛查,以识别和减轻与住院相关的风险。本研究的目的是评估全面护理和风险评估(综合评估和风险评估(CARE))计划在减少澳大利亚医院网络中获得性医院并发症(HACs)方面的有效性和成本效益。

方法和分析

本研究将包括混合方法的前后实施同时三角评估设计。主要临床结果将评估常规报告的 HACs(压力护理和跌倒)的减少,这些 HACs是根据实施前常规收集数据的可靠性选择的。次要临床结果将包括每个病例的住院时间和基于活动的成本数据、院内死亡率、28 天内预期和计划外再入院、CARE 计划完成和高危患者转介的依从性、员工满意度、患者满意度以及实施的障碍和促进因素。我们预计,由于在实施 CARE 计划之前没有评估风险的常规方法,其他 HACs(营养不良、谵妄、暴力和攻击以及自杀和自残)的发生率可能会增加。因此,我们将作为三级结果收集这些 HACs 的发生率数据。我们的主要成本效益结果将是计算增量成本效益比。

伦理和传播

已从北部卫生低风险伦理委员会获得伦理批准。本研究的结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在会议上发表。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Costs of hospital malnutrition.医院营养不良的成本。
Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1391-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
10
New investments in primary care in Australia.澳大利亚的初级保健新投资。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb 17;11:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-39.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验