• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黄体期雌激素给药及卵泡早期促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂启动方案在低反应者体外受精中的疗效

Efficacy of luteal estrogen administration and an early follicular Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist priming protocol in poor responders undergoing fertilization.

作者信息

Lee Hwajeong, Choi Hyun Joung, Yang Kwang Moon, Kim Min Jung, Cha Sun Hwa, Yi Hyun Jeong

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maria Fertility Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jan;61(1):102-110. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.102. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

DOI:10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.102
PMID:29372156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5780304/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether luteal estrogen administration and an early follicular Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (E/G-ant) priming protocol improves clinical outcomes in poor responders to controlled ovarian stimulation for fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer, and identified underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

This restrospective study consisted of 65 poor responders who underwent the E/G-ant priming protocol. Sixty-four other poor responders undergoing conventional protocols without pretreatment were included as the control group. Clinical outcomes were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

The E/G-ant priming protocol group exhibited improvements over the control group in terms of the number of retrieved oocytes (3.58±2.24 vs. 1.70±1.45; =0.000), mature oocytes (2.68±2.11 vs. 1.65±1.23; =0.000), fertilized oocytes (2.25±1.74 vs. 1.32±1.26; =0.001), good embryos (1.62±0.91 vs. 1.14±0.90, =0.021). Day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; 8.40±4.84 vs. 16.39±13.56; =0.000) and pre-ovulation progesterone levels (0.67 vs. 1.28 ng/mL; =0.016) were significantly higher in the control group than in the E/G-ant priming group. The overall rate of positive human chorionic gonadotropin tests was higher in the E/G-ant priming group than in the control group (32.3% vs.16.1%; =0.039). Also, clinical pregnancy rate (26.2% vs. 12.5%; =0.048) and the rate of live births (23.1% vs. 7.1%; =0.023) were significantly higher in the E/G-ant priming group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The E/G-ant priming protocol would lead to promising results in poor responders to IVF by suppressing endogenous FSH and by preventing premature luteinization.

摘要

目的

我们研究了黄体期给予雌激素和卵泡期早期促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(E/G-ant)预处理方案是否能改善体外受精(IVF)-胚胎移植中卵巢低反应患者的临床结局,并确定其潜在机制。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了65例接受E/G-ant预处理方案的卵巢低反应患者。另外64例未进行预处理而接受传统方案的卵巢低反应患者作为对照组。比较两组的临床结局。

结果

E/G-ant预处理方案组在获卵数(3.58±2.24 vs. 1.70±1.45;P=0.000)、成熟卵母细胞数(2.68±2.11 vs. 1.65±1.23;P=0.000)、受精卵数(2.25±1.74 vs. 1.32±1.26;P=0.001)、优质胚胎数(1.62±0.91 vs. 1.14±0.90,P=0.021)方面均优于对照组。对照组第3天的促卵泡生成素(FSH;8.40±4.84 vs. 16.39±13.56;P=0.000)和排卵前孕酮水平(0.67 vs. 1.28 ng/mL;P=0.016)显著高于E/G-ant预处理组。E/G-ant预处理组人绒毛膜促性腺激素检测阳性的总体发生率高于对照组(32.3% vs.16.1%;P=0.039)。此外,E/G-ant预处理组临床妊娠率(26.2% vs. 12.5%;P=0.048)和活产率(23.1% vs. 7.1%;P=0.023)显著高于对照组。

结论

E/G-ant预处理方案通过抑制内源性FSH和防止过早黄素化,可能会使IVF卵巢低反应患者获得较好的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1320/5780304/2aa69cbe4b40/ogs-61-102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1320/5780304/08f76782f62e/ogs-61-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1320/5780304/2aa69cbe4b40/ogs-61-102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1320/5780304/08f76782f62e/ogs-61-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1320/5780304/2aa69cbe4b40/ogs-61-102-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of luteal estrogen administration and an early follicular Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist priming protocol in poor responders undergoing fertilization.黄体期雌激素给药及卵泡早期促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂启动方案在低反应者体外受精中的疗效
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jan;61(1):102-110. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.102. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial.“推迟启动”方案联合促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂是否能改善博洛尼亚反应不良者的妊娠结局?一项随机临床试验。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Dec 28;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0442-y.
3
Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization.黄体期和刺激期雌激素预处理对体外受精中反应不良者的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Mar;29(3):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9685-7. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
4
Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案相比,黄体期卵巢刺激对于接受体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植治疗的卵巢反应不良者是一种可行的方法:一项回顾性研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;55(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.07.001.
5
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus agonist administration in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: cycle performance and in vitro steroidogenesis of granulosa-lutein cells.在接受控制性卵巢过度刺激的女性中,促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与激动剂给药的比较:周期表现及颗粒黄体细胞的体外类固醇生成
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;172(5):1518-25. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90490-5.
6
Early Follicular Phase Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Addition May Improve the Outcomes of Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients With "Unpredictable" Poor Response to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol.早卵泡期添加人绒毛膜促性腺激素可能改善 GnRH 拮抗剂方案“不可预测”低反应患者受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的结局。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 11;12:739773. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.739773. eCollection 2021.
7
Nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after the administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin, recombinant luteinizing hormone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization patients after ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and GnRH antagonist cotreatment.在接受重组促卵泡激素和促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂联合治疗进行卵巢刺激后的体外受精患者中,给予重组人绒毛膜促性腺激素、重组促黄体生成素或GnRH激动剂诱导最终卵母细胞成熟后,未补充黄体期的特征。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Sep;88(9):4186-92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021953.
8
[Comparison of GnRH antagonist fixed protocol and GnRH agonists long protocol in infertile patients with normal ovarian reserve function in their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle].[GnRH拮抗剂固定方案与GnRH激动剂长方案在首次体外受精-胚胎移植周期中卵巢储备功能正常的不孕患者中的比较]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):245-9.
9
A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders.一种新的“延迟启动”方案,联合使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂,可以改善卵巢低反应患者的结局。
Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.050. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
10
A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.两种卵巢刺激方案与促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂联合治疗用于体外受精的随机比较,这两种方案分别是在周期第2天或第5天开始使用重组促卵泡激素并与标准长效GnRH激动剂方案进行对比。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jan;88(1):166-73. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020788.

引用本文的文献

1
Live birth rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与黄体期促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射中的活产率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023 Dec 14;26:e2. doi: 10.1017/erm.2023.25.
2
Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.卵巢低反应者的卵巢刺激方案:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1713-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06565-6. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Progesterone-to-follicle index is better correlated with in vitro fertilization cycle outcome than blood progesterone level.孕激素/卵泡指数与体外受精周期结局的相关性优于血孕激素水平。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103(3):669-74.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.026. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
2
Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new?体外受精中反应不良者的管理:有什么新进展吗?
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:352098. doi: 10.1155/2014/352098. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
3
High progesterone levels in women with high ovarian response do not affect clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.
Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial.
“推迟启动”方案联合促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂是否能改善博洛尼亚反应不良者的妊娠结局?一项随机临床试验。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Dec 28;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0442-y.
高卵巢反应女性的高孕酮水平不影响临床结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Jul 26;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-69.
4
Optimisation of the follicular phase in IVF/ICSI.体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射中卵泡期的优化
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(3):203-12.
5
A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders.一种新的“延迟启动”方案,联合使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂,可以改善卵巢低反应患者的结局。
Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.050. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
6
Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles.孕激素升高与 IVF 后妊娠概率:超过 60000 个周期的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):433-57. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt014. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
7
Serum progesterone level effects on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with different ovarian response: an analysis of more than 10,000 cycles.血清孕激素水平对不同卵巢反应患者体外受精结局的影响:超过 10000 个周期的分析。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1321-7.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
8
Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization.黄体期和刺激期雌激素预处理对体外受精中反应不良者的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Mar;29(3):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9685-7. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
9
Impact of 'LH activity' supplementation on serum progesterone levels during controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review.“LH 活性”补充对控制性卵巢刺激期间血清孕激素水平的影响:系统评价。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Jan;27(1):232-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der380. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
10
A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel?一项针对卵巢反应不良患者治疗的随机试验的系统评价:隧道尽头是否有光?
Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1058-61.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048.