Suppr超能文献

肢体骨整合后的临床相关结局指标;文献系统评价

Clinically Relevant Outcome Measures Following Limb Osseointegration; Systematic Review of the Literature.

作者信息

Al Muderis Munjed M, Lu William Y, Li Jiao Jiao, Kaufman Kenton, Orendurff Michael, Highsmith M Jason, Lunseth Paul A, Kahle Jason T

机构信息

The Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Auburn, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Feb;32(2):e64-e75. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001031.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The current standard of care for an amputee is a socket-based prostheses. An osseointegrated implant (OI) is an alternative for prosthetic attachment. Osseointegration addresses reported problems related to wearing a socket interface, such as skin issues, discomfort, diminished function, quality of life, prosthetic use, and abandonment. The purpose of this report is to systematically review current literature regarding OI to identify and categorize the reported clinically relevant outcome measures, rate the quality of available evidence, and synthesize the findings.

DATA SOURCES

A multidisciplinary team used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methods. Search methodology was based on identifying clinically relevant articles. Three databases were searched: PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical studies with aggregated data reporting at least 1 clinically relevant outcome measure were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criterion was used for critical appraisal and recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified 21 clinically relevant observational studies. Outcome measures were categorized into the following 9 categories: vibratory stimulation, complications, biomechanics, economics, patient-reported outcome measures, electromyography, x-ray, physical functional performance, and energy consumption. This systematic review consisted of Level III and IV observational studies. Homogeneous outcome measures with strong psychometric properties across prospective studies do not exist to date. Higher-level, prospective, randomized, long-term, clinically relevant trials are needed to prove efficacy of OI compared with socket prosthetic attachment. Osseointegration was at least equivalent to sockets in most studies. In some cases, it was superior. Osseointegration represents a promising alternative to socket prosthetic attachments for extremity amputees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

目前截肢者的护理标准是基于接受腔的假肢。骨整合植入物(OI)是假肢连接的一种替代方案。骨整合解决了与佩戴接受腔界面相关的一些问题,如皮肤问题、不适、功能减退、生活质量、假肢使用及弃用等。本报告的目的是系统回顾关于骨整合植入物的现有文献,以识别和分类已报道的临床相关结局指标,评估现有证据的质量,并综合研究结果。

数据来源

一个多学科团队采用PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)方法。检索方法基于识别临床相关文章。检索了三个数据库:PubMed、CINAHL和科学网。

研究选择

纳入报告至少一项临床相关结局指标的汇总数据的临床研究。

数据提取

采用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)标准进行严格评价和推荐。

结论

本综述识别出21项临床相关观察性研究。结局指标分为以下9类:振动刺激、并发症、生物力学、经济学、患者报告结局指标、肌电图、X线、身体功能表现和能量消耗。本系统综述包括III级和IV级观察性研究。迄今为止,前瞻性研究中不存在具有强大心理测量特性的同质结局指标。需要更高水平、前瞻性、随机、长期、临床相关的试验来证明与接受腔假肢连接相比,骨整合植入物的疗效。在大多数研究中,骨整合至少与接受腔相当。在某些情况下,它更具优势。对于肢体截肢者,骨整合是接受腔假肢连接的一种有前景的替代方案。

证据水平

治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验