• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于单测线数据的捷联式航空重力测量质量评估方法:以SGA-WZ02重力仪为例的研究

Strapdown Airborne Gravimetry Quality Assessment Method Based on Single Survey Line Data: A Study by SGA-WZ02 Gravimeter.

作者信息

Wang Minghao, Wu Meiping, Cao Juliang, Zhang Kaidong, Cai Shaokun, Yu Ruihang

机构信息

College of Mechatronics and Automation, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jan 26;18(2):360. doi: 10.3390/s18020360.

DOI:10.3390/s18020360
PMID:29373535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5855137/
Abstract

Quality assessment is an important part in the strapdown airborne gravimetry. Root mean square error (RMSE) evaluation method is a classical way to evaluate the gravimetry quality, but classical evaluation methods are preconditioned by extra flight or reference data. Thus, a method, which is able to largely conquer the premises of classical quality assessment methods and can be used in single survey line, has been developed in this paper. According to theoretical analysis, the method chooses the stability of two horizontal attitude angles, horizontal specific force and vertical specific force as the determinants of quality assessment method. The actual data, collected by SGA-WZ02 from 13 flights 21 lines in certain survey, was used to build the model and elaborate the method. To substantiate the performance of the quality assessment model, the model is applied in extra repeat line flights from two surveys. Compared with internal RMSE, standard deviation of assessment residuals are 0.23 mGal and 0.16 mGal in two surveys, which shows that the quality assessment method is reliable and stricter. The extra flights are not necessary by specially arranging the route of flights. The method, summarized from SGA-WZ02, is a feasible approach to assess gravimetry quality using single line data and is also suitable for other strapdown gravimeters.

摘要

质量评估是捷联式航空重力测量中的重要组成部分。均方根误差(RMSE)评估方法是评估重力测量质量的经典方法,但经典评估方法需要额外的飞行或参考数据作为前提条件。因此,本文开发了一种能够在很大程度上克服经典质量评估方法前提条件且可用于单条测线的方法。通过理论分析,该方法选择两个水平姿态角的稳定性、水平比力和垂直比力作为质量评估方法的决定因素。利用SGA-WZ02在某一测量中13次飞行21条测线采集的实际数据来建立模型并阐述该方法。为了验证质量评估模型的性能,将该模型应用于两次测量的额外重复测线飞行中。与内部RMSE相比,两次测量中评估残差的标准差分别为0.23 mGal和0.16 mGal,这表明该质量评估方法可靠且更严格。无需专门安排飞行路线进行额外飞行。从SGA-WZ02总结出的该方法是一种利用单条测线数据评估重力测量质量的可行方法,也适用于其他捷联式重力仪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/02cf4c774894/sensors-18-00360-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/8c64bcd40de6/sensors-18-00360-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/6b46f1d49f60/sensors-18-00360-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/5f0b4cfea713/sensors-18-00360-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/f90e5d6c1a7f/sensors-18-00360-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/97448ebf3664/sensors-18-00360-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/bc2761cd4362/sensors-18-00360-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/f21000ed1ba3/sensors-18-00360-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/ab9b1488a956/sensors-18-00360-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/91cbad5cb551/sensors-18-00360-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/40f441058691/sensors-18-00360-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/d2094bbb09ea/sensors-18-00360-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/633339cd7ffb/sensors-18-00360-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/7f3b86feecc2/sensors-18-00360-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/dd0e7c1b6007/sensors-18-00360-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/310475d13b70/sensors-18-00360-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/02cf4c774894/sensors-18-00360-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/8c64bcd40de6/sensors-18-00360-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/6b46f1d49f60/sensors-18-00360-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/5f0b4cfea713/sensors-18-00360-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/f90e5d6c1a7f/sensors-18-00360-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/97448ebf3664/sensors-18-00360-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/bc2761cd4362/sensors-18-00360-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/f21000ed1ba3/sensors-18-00360-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/ab9b1488a956/sensors-18-00360-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/91cbad5cb551/sensors-18-00360-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/40f441058691/sensors-18-00360-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/d2094bbb09ea/sensors-18-00360-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/633339cd7ffb/sensors-18-00360-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/7f3b86feecc2/sensors-18-00360-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/dd0e7c1b6007/sensors-18-00360-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/310475d13b70/sensors-18-00360-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/756a/5855137/02cf4c774894/sensors-18-00360-g016.jpg

相似文献

1
Strapdown Airborne Gravimetry Quality Assessment Method Based on Single Survey Line Data: A Study by SGA-WZ02 Gravimeter.基于单测线数据的捷联式航空重力测量质量评估方法:以SGA-WZ02重力仪为例的研究
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jan 26;18(2):360. doi: 10.3390/s18020360.
2
Improving the Strapdown Airborne Vector Gravimetry by a Backward Inertial Navigation Algorithm.利用反向惯性导航算法提高捷联航空重力测量精度。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Dec 14;18(12):4432. doi: 10.3390/s18124432.
3
An SINS/GNSS Ground Vehicle Gravimetry Test Based on SGA-WZ02.基于SGA-WZ02的车载SINS/GNSS重力测量试验
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Sep 16;15(9):23477-95. doi: 10.3390/s150923477.
4
A Flight Test of the Strapdown Airborne Gravimeter SGA-WZ in Greenland.格陵兰岛捷联式航空重力仪SGA-WZ的飞行测试
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Jun 5;15(6):13258-69. doi: 10.3390/s150613258.
5
Long-term stability of the SGA-WZ strapdown airborne gravimeter.SGA-WZ 捷联式航空重力仪的长期稳定性。
Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(8):11091-9. doi: 10.3390/s120811091. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Measurements and Accuracy Evaluation of a Strapdown Marine Gravimeter Based on Inertial Navigation.基于惯性导航的捷联式海洋重力仪的测量与精度评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 12;18(11):3902. doi: 10.3390/s18113902.
7
Helicopter Test of a Strapdown Airborne Gravimetry System.捷联式航空重力测量系统的直升机试验。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Sep 16;18(9):3121. doi: 10.3390/s18093121.
8
Optimized Design of the SGA-WZ Strapdown Airborne Gravimeter Temperature Control System.SGA-WZ捷联式航空重力仪温度控制系统的优化设计
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Dec 1;15(12):29984-96. doi: 10.3390/s151229781.
9
SGA-WZ: a new strapdown airborne gravimeter.SGA-WZ:一种新型捷联式航空重力仪。
Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(7):9336-48. doi: 10.3390/s120709336. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
10
A Feasibility Analysis of Land-Based SINS/GNSS Gravimetry for Groundwater Resource Detection in Taiwan.基于陆地的捷联惯导系统/全球导航卫星系统重力测量用于台湾地下水资源探测的可行性分析
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Sep 29;15(10):25039-54. doi: 10.3390/s151025039.

本文引用的文献

1
A New Method for Land Vehicle Gravimetry Using SINS/VEL.一种利用捷联惯性导航系统/速度传感器的陆地车辆重力测量新方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Apr 4;17(4):766. doi: 10.3390/s17040766.
2
Optimized Design of the SGA-WZ Strapdown Airborne Gravimeter Temperature Control System.SGA-WZ捷联式航空重力仪温度控制系统的优化设计
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Dec 1;15(12):29984-96. doi: 10.3390/s151229781.
3
SGA-WZ: a new strapdown airborne gravimeter.SGA-WZ:一种新型捷联式航空重力仪。
Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(7):9336-48. doi: 10.3390/s120709336. Epub 2012 Jul 6.