Wang Minghao, Wu Meiping, Cao Juliang, Zhang Kaidong, Cai Shaokun, Yu Ruihang
College of Mechatronics and Automation, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jan 26;18(2):360. doi: 10.3390/s18020360.
Quality assessment is an important part in the strapdown airborne gravimetry. Root mean square error (RMSE) evaluation method is a classical way to evaluate the gravimetry quality, but classical evaluation methods are preconditioned by extra flight or reference data. Thus, a method, which is able to largely conquer the premises of classical quality assessment methods and can be used in single survey line, has been developed in this paper. According to theoretical analysis, the method chooses the stability of two horizontal attitude angles, horizontal specific force and vertical specific force as the determinants of quality assessment method. The actual data, collected by SGA-WZ02 from 13 flights 21 lines in certain survey, was used to build the model and elaborate the method. To substantiate the performance of the quality assessment model, the model is applied in extra repeat line flights from two surveys. Compared with internal RMSE, standard deviation of assessment residuals are 0.23 mGal and 0.16 mGal in two surveys, which shows that the quality assessment method is reliable and stricter. The extra flights are not necessary by specially arranging the route of flights. The method, summarized from SGA-WZ02, is a feasible approach to assess gravimetry quality using single line data and is also suitable for other strapdown gravimeters.
质量评估是捷联式航空重力测量中的重要组成部分。均方根误差(RMSE)评估方法是评估重力测量质量的经典方法,但经典评估方法需要额外的飞行或参考数据作为前提条件。因此,本文开发了一种能够在很大程度上克服经典质量评估方法前提条件且可用于单条测线的方法。通过理论分析,该方法选择两个水平姿态角的稳定性、水平比力和垂直比力作为质量评估方法的决定因素。利用SGA-WZ02在某一测量中13次飞行21条测线采集的实际数据来建立模型并阐述该方法。为了验证质量评估模型的性能,将该模型应用于两次测量的额外重复测线飞行中。与内部RMSE相比,两次测量中评估残差的标准差分别为0.23 mGal和0.16 mGal,这表明该质量评估方法可靠且更严格。无需专门安排飞行路线进行额外飞行。从SGA-WZ02总结出的该方法是一种利用单条测线数据评估重力测量质量的可行方法,也适用于其他捷联式重力仪。