• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院招募务实的整群随机临床试验:COMPASS研究的经验教训。

Hospital recruitment for a pragmatic cluster-randomized clinical trial: Lessons learned from the COMPASS study.

作者信息

Johnson Anna M, Jones Sara B, Duncan Pamela W, Bushnell Cheryl D, Coleman Sylvia W, Mettam Laurie H, Kucharska-Newton Anna M, Sissine Mysha E, Rosamond Wayne D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA.

Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Jan 26;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2434-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2434-1
PMID:29373987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5787294/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pragmatic randomized clinical trials are essential to determine the effectiveness of interventions in "real-world" clinical practice. These trials frequently use a cluster-randomized methodology, with randomization at the site level. Despite policymakers' increased interest in supporting pragmatic randomized clinical trials, no studies to date have reported on the unique recruitment challenges faced by cluster-randomized pragmatic trials. We investigated key challenges and successful strategies for hospital recruitment in the Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study.

METHODS

The COMPASS study is designed to compare the effectiveness of the COMPASS model versus usual care in improving functional outcomes, reducing the numbers of hospital readmissions, and reducing caregiver strain for patients discharged home after stroke or transient ischemic attack. This model integrates early supported discharge planning with transitional care management, including nurse-led follow-up phone calls after 2, 30, and 60 days and an in-person clinic visit at 7-14 days involving a functional assessment and neurological examination. We present descriptive statistics of the characteristics of successfully recruited hospitals compared with all eligible hospitals, reasons for non-participation, and effective recruitment strategies.

RESULTS

We successfully recruited 41 (43%) of 95 eligible North Carolina hospitals. Leading, non-exclusive reasons for non-participation included: insufficient staff or financial resources (n = 33, 61%), lack of health system support (n = 16, 30%), and lack of support of individual decision-makers (n = 11, 20%). Successful recruitment strategies included: building and nurturing relationships, engaging team members and community partners with a diverse skill mix, identifying gatekeepers, finding mutually beneficial solutions, having a central institutional review board, sharing published pilot data, and integrating contracts and review board administrators.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we incorporated strategies based on the best available evidence at the outset of the study, hospital recruitment required three times as much time and considerably more staff than anticipated. To reach our goal, we tailored strategies to individuals, hospitals, and health systems. Successful recruitment of a sufficient number and representative mix of hospitals requires considerable preparation, planning, and flexibility. Strategies presented here may assist future trial organizers in implementing cluster-randomized pragmatic trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02588664 . Registered on 23 October 2015.

摘要

背景

实用随机临床试验对于确定干预措施在“现实世界”临床实践中的有效性至关重要。这些试验经常采用整群随机方法,在机构层面进行随机分组。尽管政策制定者对支持实用随机临床试验的兴趣日益浓厚,但迄今为止尚无研究报告整群随机实用试验所面临的独特招募挑战。我们在综合急性卒中后服务(COMPASS)研究中调查了医院招募的关键挑战和成功策略。

方法

COMPASS研究旨在比较COMPASS模式与常规护理在改善功能结局、减少医院再入院次数以及减轻卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作后出院回家患者的照料者负担方面的有效性。该模式将早期支持性出院计划与过渡性护理管理相结合,包括在第2天、30天和60天由护士主导的随访电话,以及在第7 - 14天进行的包含功能评估和神经学检查的门诊就诊。我们展示了成功招募的医院与所有符合条件医院的特征描述性统计数据、未参与的原因以及有效的招募策略。

结果

我们成功招募了北卡罗来纳州95家符合条件医院中的41家(43%)。未参与的主要非排他性原因包括:工作人员或财政资源不足(n = 33,61%)、缺乏卫生系统支持(n = 16,30%)以及缺乏个人决策者的支持(n = 11,20%)。成功的招募策略包括:建立和培养关系、让具有不同技能组合的团队成员和社区合作伙伴参与、确定把关人、找到互利的解决方案、设立中央机构审查委员会、分享已发表的试点数据以及整合合同和审查委员会管理人员。

结论

尽管我们在研究开始时就纳入了基于现有最佳证据的策略,但医院招募所需的时间是预期的三倍,工作人员也比预期多得多。为了实现我们的目标,我们针对个人、医院和卫生系统调整了策略。成功招募足够数量且具有代表性的医院组合需要大量的准备、规划和灵活性。这里介绍的策略可能有助于未来的试验组织者开展整群随机实用试验。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT02588664。于2015年10月23日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/5787294/87fdbb0c947d/13063_2017_2434_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/5787294/594010df5c9b/13063_2017_2434_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/5787294/74c8c70e5be7/13063_2017_2434_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/5787294/87fdbb0c947d/13063_2017_2434_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/5787294/594010df5c9b/13063_2017_2434_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/5787294/74c8c70e5be7/13063_2017_2434_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/5787294/87fdbb0c947d/13063_2017_2434_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospital recruitment for a pragmatic cluster-randomized clinical trial: Lessons learned from the COMPASS study.医院招募务实的整群随机临床试验:COMPASS研究的经验教训。
Trials. 2018 Jan 26;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2434-1.
2
The Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study: design and methods for a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.急性卒中后综合服务(COMPASS)研究:一项整群随机实用试验的设计与方法
BMC Neurol. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0907-1.
3
Implementation of a billable transitional care model for stroke patients: the COMPASS study.为中风患者实施可计费的过渡护理模式:COMPASS 研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):978. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4771-0.
4
COMPASS-CP: An Electronic Application to Capture Patient-Reported Outcomes to Develop Actionable Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Care Plans.COMPASS-CP:一种用于获取患者报告结局以制定可实施的中风和短暂性脑缺血发作护理计划的电子应用程序。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Aug;11(8):e004444. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004444.
5
Randomized Pragmatic Trial of Stroke Transitional Care: The COMPASS Study.中风过渡护理的随机实用试验:COMPASS研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jun;13(6):e006285. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006285. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Hospital Readmissions and Mortality Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Findings From the COMPASS Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Trial.医保自费患者中轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的住院再入院率和死亡率:来自 COMPASS 集群随机实用试验的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e023394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023394. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Implementation of a Transitional Care Model for Stroke: Perspectives From Frontline Clinicians, Administrators, and COMPASS-TC Implementation Staff.实施卒中医师、行政人员和 COMPASS-TC 实施工作人员的过渡护理模式的观点。
Gerontologist. 2020 Aug 14;60(6):1071-1084. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa029.
8
A Person-Centered Approach to Poststroke Care: The COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services Model.以患者为中心的卒中后护理方法:全面的急性后期卒中服务模式。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 May;66(5):1025-1030. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15322. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
9
Familial caregiving following stroke: findings from the comprehensive post-acute stroke services (COMPASS) pragmatic cluster-randomized transitional care study.中风后的家庭护理:来自综合急性后中风服务(COMPASS)实用集群随机过渡性护理研究的结果。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Jul;30(5):436-447. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2022.2077520. Epub 2022 May 22.
10
Referral to Community-Based Rehabilitation Following Acute Stroke: Findings From the COMPASS Pragmatic Trial.急性脑卒中后转介至社区康复治疗:来自 COMPASS 实用临床试验的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jan;17(1):e010026. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010026. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Taxonomy of chronic illness research recruitment: a restricted scoping review.慢性病研究招募的分类学:一项限定性范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13115-8.
2
Novel approaches to recruiting clinical sites for embedded pragmatic clinical trials: Insights from the AIM-back trial.为嵌入式实用临床试验招募临床站点的新方法:来自AIM-back试验的见解。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Apr 11;45:101483. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101483. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Qualitative study of challenges with recruitment of hospitals into a cluster controlled trial of clinical decision support in Australia.

本文引用的文献

1
The Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study: design and methods for a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.急性卒中后综合服务(COMPASS)研究:一项整群随机实用试验的设计与方法
BMC Neurol. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0907-1.
2
Methods guiding stakeholder engagement in planning a pragmatic study on changing stroke systems of care.指导利益相关者参与规划一项关于改变卒中护理系统的务实研究的方法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr;1(2):121-128. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.26. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 4. Informed consent.
澳大利亚临床决策支持系统整群控制试验中招募医院面临的挑战定性研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e080610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080610.
4
Referral to Community-Based Rehabilitation Following Acute Stroke: Findings From the COMPASS Pragmatic Trial.急性脑卒中后转介至社区康复治疗:来自 COMPASS 实用临床试验的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jan;17(1):e010026. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010026. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
5
Assessing the representativeness of cluster randomized trials: Evidence from two large pragmatic trials in United States nursing homes.评估群组随机对照试验的代表性:来自美国养老院两项大型实用试验的证据。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):613-623. doi: 10.1177/17407745231185055. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
6
Hospital Readmissions and Mortality Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Findings From the COMPASS Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Trial.医保自费患者中轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的住院再入院率和死亡率:来自 COMPASS 集群随机实用试验的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e023394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023394. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Effectiveness of knowledge brokering and recommendation dissemination for influencing healthcare resource allocation decisions: A cluster randomised controlled implementation trial.知识经纪人与推荐传播对影响医疗资源配置决策的效果:一项集群随机对照实施试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 22;18(10):e1003833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003833. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial.招募高心理社会风险的难以接触的孕妇:一项随机对照试验的策略和成本。
Trials. 2021 Jun 16;22(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05348-9.
9
Strategies for facilitating the delivery of cluster randomized trials in hospitals: A study informed by the CFIR-ERIC matching tool.促进医院实施整群随机试验的策略:基于 CFIR-ERIC 匹配工具的研究。
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):398-407. doi: 10.1177/17407745211001504. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
10
Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection.与医疗机构合作,了解癌症幸存者的心理社会困扰筛查实践:对研究设计、招募和数据收集的试点研究意义
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5.
系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文4. 知情同意
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
NIH Policy on Single-IRB Review - A New Era in Multicenter Studies.美国国立卫生研究院单独立伦理审查委员会审查政策——多中心研究的新时代。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2315-2317. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608766.
5
Pragmatic Trials.实用性试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059.
6
Reducing Readmissions After Stroke With a Structured Nurse Practitioner/Registered Nurse Transitional Stroke Program.通过结构化的护士执业医师/注册护士过渡性中风项目减少中风后的再入院。
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1599-604. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012524. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Ethics and Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities in Patient-Centered Comparative Effectiveness Research.以患者为中心的比较效果研究中的伦理与监管挑战及机遇
Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):455-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001096.
8
Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials.实用临床试验的把关者。
Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):442-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597699. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose.PRECIS-2工具:设计符合目的的试验。
BMJ. 2015 May 8;350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147.
10
Ethical and regulatory issues of pragmatic cluster randomized trials in contemporary health systems.当代卫生系统中实用整群随机试验的伦理和监管问题
Clin Trials. 2015 Jun;12(3):276-86. doi: 10.1177/1740774515571140. Epub 2015 Mar 1.