• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative study of challenges with recruitment of hospitals into a cluster controlled trial of clinical decision support in Australia.澳大利亚临床决策支持系统整群控制试验中招募医院面临的挑战定性研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e080610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080610.
2
Is evidence of effectiveness a driver for clinical decision support selection? A qualitative descriptive study of senior hospital staff.有效性证据是否是临床决策支持选择的驱动因素?一项针对医院高层员工的定性描述性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Feb 20;35(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad004.
3
Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.走向数字化:医院全面实施电子病历及数字化转型的准备清单。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):302-313. doi: 10.1071/AH17153.
4
The implementation, use and sustainability of a clinical decision support system for medication optimisation in primary care: A qualitative evaluation.临床决策支持系统在初级保健中优化药物治疗的实施、使用和可持续性:定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250946. eCollection 2021.
5
Pre-implementation adaptation of primary care cancer prevention clinical decision support in a predominantly rural healthcare system.在以农村为主的医疗体系中,对初级保健癌症预防临床决策支持进行实施前的调整。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01136-8.
6
Remote supervision of medical training via videoconference in northern Australia: a qualitative study of the perspectives of supervisors and trainees.澳大利亚北部通过视频会议对医学培训进行远程监督:对监督者和受训者观点的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 20;5(3):e006444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006444.
7
Optimising computerised decision support to transform medication safety and reduce prescriber burden: study protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation of drug-drug interaction alerts.优化计算机决策支持以改善用药安全并减轻开方者负担:药物相互作用警报的混合方法评估研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e026034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026034.
8
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the validity, perceived usefulness, and usability of I-MeDeSA and TEMAS, two tools to evaluate alert system usability.比较 I-MeDeSA 和 TEMAS 这两种评估警报系统可用性工具的有效性、感知有用性和易用性。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jul;175:105091. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091. Epub 2023 May 10.
2
Is evidence of effectiveness a driver for clinical decision support selection? A qualitative descriptive study of senior hospital staff.有效性证据是否是临床决策支持选择的驱动因素?一项针对医院高层员工的定性描述性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Feb 20;35(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad004.
3
Short- and long-term effects of an electronic medication management system on paediatric prescribing errors.电子药物管理系统对儿科处方错误的短期和长期影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Dec 13;5(1):179. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00739-x.
4
Developing principles for sharing information about potential trial intervention benefits and harms with patients: report of a modified Delphi survey.制定向患者分享潜在试验干预措施获益和风险信息的原则:一项改良德尔菲调查的报告。
Trials. 2022 Oct 8;23(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06780-1.
5
Strategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studies.旨在帮助医疗保健专业人员招募研究参与者的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 29;2(2):MR000036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000036.pub2.
6
Value and engagement: what can clinical trials learn from techniques used in not-for-profit marketing?价值与参与:临床试验可以从非营利营销中借鉴哪些技术?
Trials. 2022 Jun 2;23(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06417-3.
7
Optimising recruitment to the HAND-1 RCT feasibility study: integration of the QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI).优化HAND-1随机对照试验可行性研究的招募工作:整合昆特招募干预措施(QRI)。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Nov 9;6(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00710-1.
8
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响医疗保健领域随机试验招募的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):MR000045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000045.pub2.
9
Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions-A call for innovative evidence generation approaches.数字健康解决方案评估面临的挑战——呼吁采用创新的证据生成方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 27;3:110. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00314-2. eCollection 2020.
10
Prescriber perceptions of medication-related computerized decision support systems in hospitals: A synthesis of qualitative research.医疗机构中药物相关计算机化决策支持系统的处方医师认知:定性研究综合分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.024. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

澳大利亚临床决策支持系统整群控制试验中招募医院面临的挑战定性研究

Qualitative study of challenges with recruitment of hospitals into a cluster controlled trial of clinical decision support in Australia.

机构信息

Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e080610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080610.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080610
PMID:38479736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10936458/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify barriers to hospital participation in controlled cluster trials of clinical decision support (CDS) and potential strategies for addressing barriers.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive design comprising semistructured interviews.

SETTING

Five hospitals in New South Wales and one hospital in Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Senior hospital staff, including department directors, chief information officers and those working in health informatics teams.

RESULTS

20 senior hospital staff took part. Barriers to hospital-level recruitment primarily related to perceptions of risk associated with not implementing CDS as a control site. Perceived risks included reductions in patient safety, reputational risk and increased likelihood that benefits would not be achieved following electronic medical record (EMR) implementation without CDS alerts in place. Senior staff recommended clear communication of trial information to all relevant stakeholders as a key strategy for boosting hospital-level participation in trials.

CONCLUSION

Hospital participation in controlled cluster trials of CDS is hindered by perceptions that adopting an EMR without CDS is risky for both patients and organisations. The improvements in safety expected to follow CDS implementation makes it challenging and counterintuitive for hospitals to implement EMR without incorporating CDS alerts for the purposes of a research trial. To counteract these barriers, clear communication regarding the evidence base and rationale for a controlled trial is needed.

摘要

目的

确定医院参与临床决策支持(CDS)对照集群试验的障碍,以及解决这些障碍的潜在策略。

设计

包括半结构化访谈的定性描述性设计。

地点

澳大利亚新南威尔士州的五家医院和昆士兰州的一家医院。

参与者

包括部门主任、首席信息官和从事卫生信息学团队工作的高级医院工作人员。

结果

20 名高级医院工作人员参与了研究。医院层面参与的障碍主要与不将 CDS 作为对照点实施相关的风险认知有关。感知到的风险包括患者安全降低、声誉风险增加,以及在没有 CDS 警报的情况下实施电子病历(EMR)后,利益实现的可能性增加。高级工作人员建议向所有相关利益攸关方明确传达试验信息,作为提高医院参与试验的关键策略。

结论

医院参与 CDS 的对照集群试验受到阻碍,因为人们认为采用没有 CDS 的 EMR 对患者和组织都存在风险。由于 CDS 实施后预期会提高安全性,因此医院在没有为研究试验目的纳入 CDS 警报的情况下实施 EMR 具有挑战性且违背直觉。为了克服这些障碍,需要就对照试验的证据基础和基本原理进行清晰的沟通。