Behney Adam C, O'Shaughnessy Ryan, Eichholz Michael W, Stafford Joshua D
Department of Zoology Center for Ecology Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory Southern Illinois University Carbondale IL USA.
Present address: Avian Research Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife Fort Collins CO USA.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec 12;8(2):961-972. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3714. eCollection 2018 Jan.
Indirect risk effects of predators on prey behavior can have more of an impact on prey populations than direct consumptive effects. Predation risk can elicit more vigilance behavior in prey, reducing the amount of time available for other activities, such as foraging, which could potentially reduce foraging efficiency. Understanding the conditions associated with predation risk and the specific effects predation risk have on prey behavior is important because it has direct influences on the profitability of food items found under various conditions and states of the forager. The goals of this study were to assess how ducks perceived predation risk in various habitat types and how strongly perceived risk versus energetic demand affected foraging behavior. We manipulated food abundance in different wetland types in Illinois, USA to reduce confounding between food abundance and vegetation structure. We conducted focal-animal behavioral samples on five duck species in treatment and control plots and used generalized linear mixed-effects models to compare the effects of vegetation structure versus other factors on the intensity with which ducks fed and the duration of feeding stints. Mallards fed more intensively and, along with blue-winged teal, used longer feeding stints in open habitats, consistent with the hypothesis that limited visibility was perceived to have a greater predation risk than unlimited visibility. The species temporally nearest to nesting, wood ducks, were willing to take more risks for a greater food reward, consistent with an increase in a marginal value of energy as they approached nesting. Our results indicate that some duck species value energy differently based on the surrounding vegetation structure and density. Furthermore, increases in the marginal value of energy can be more influential than perceived risk in shaping foraging behavior patterns. Based on these findings, we conclude that the value of various food items is not solely determined by energy contained in the item but by conditions in which it is found and the state of the forager.
捕食者对猎物行为的间接风险影响对猎物种群的影响可能比直接的消耗性影响更大。捕食风险会引发猎物更多的警惕行为,减少可用于其他活动(如觅食)的时间,这可能会降低觅食效率。了解与捕食风险相关的条件以及捕食风险对猎物行为的具体影响很重要,因为它直接影响在各种条件和觅食者状态下发现的食物的获利能力。本研究的目的是评估鸭子如何感知不同栖息地类型中的捕食风险,以及感知到的风险与能量需求如何强烈地影响觅食行为。我们在美国伊利诺伊州不同的湿地类型中操纵食物丰度,以减少食物丰度和植被结构之间的混淆。我们在处理区和对照区对五种鸭科动物进行了焦点动物行为样本采集,并使用广义线性混合效应模型来比较植被结构与其他因素对鸭子觅食强度和觅食持续时间的影响。绿头鸭觅食更密集,与蓝翅鸭一起,在开阔栖息地使用更长的觅食持续时间,这与有限能见度被认为比无限能见度有更大捕食风险的假设一致。时间上最接近筑巢期的林鸳鸯愿意为了更大的食物奖励冒更多风险,这与它们接近筑巢期时能量边际价值的增加一致。我们的结果表明,一些鸭科动物根据周围的植被结构和密度对能量的重视程度不同。此外,在塑造觅食行为模式方面,能量边际价值的增加可能比感知到的风险更具影响力。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,各种食物的价值不仅取决于食物所含的能量,还取决于发现食物的条件和觅食者的状态。