Department of Cardiology - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Hamburg, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;29(4):537-547. doi: 10.1111/jce.13447. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
To evaluate the incidence of newly diagnosed intracardiac thrombi (ICT) in respect to the mode of OAC in patients undergoing cardioversion (CV).
We prospectively assessed transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and OAC therapy prior to CV in AF patients with ≥48-hour duration scheduled for CV. A total of 60 first-time ICT (4.7%) were diagnosed in 1,286 TEE, with highest rate in patients without OAC (9.6% vs. OAC 4.1%, P = 0.009) and an apparently lower rate in nonvitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOAC) therapy compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (2.5% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.02). VKA therapy control 4 weeks prior to CV was overall average (time in therapeutic range 60%) and patients showed more frequently clinical characteristics and TEE parameters associated with risk for ICT. Even among patients with effective OAC therapy (uninterrupted NOAC and VKA therapy with international normalized ratio (INR) ≥2.0 for 3 weeks), ICT occurred in 2.7%, but with no difference between both groups (P = 0.22). There was no difference between different types of NOAC. Independent predictors for ICT were history of embolism, hypertension, BMI, absence of OAC, renal function, reduced atrial appendage flow, and presence of spontaneous echo contrast.
NOAC therapy seems favorable in the overall prevention of ICT, although this is likely to be caused by suboptimal VKA therapy control and differences in the overall health status between VKA and NOAC patients. ICT occurred even with effective OAC therapy suggesting individual TEE-guided cardioversion in patients at risk.
评估接受心脏复律 (CV) 的患者中,根据口服抗凝药物 (OAC) 方式,新发心内血栓 (ICT) 的发生率。
我们前瞻性评估了计划 CV 的持续时间≥48 小时的 AF 患者,在 CV 前进行经食管超声心动图 (TEE) 和 OAC 治疗。在 1286 次 TEE 中,共诊断出 60 例首次 ICT(4.7%),无 OAC 的患者发生率最高(9.6%比 OAC 组的 4.1%,P=0.009),与维生素 K 拮抗剂 (VKA) 相比,非维生素 K 拮抗剂抗凝剂 (NOAC) 治疗的发生率明显较低(2.5%比 5.3%,P=0.02)。CV 前 4 周的 VKA 治疗总体平均(治疗范围时间 60%),患者表现出更多与 ICT 风险相关的临床特征和 TEE 参数。即使在接受有效 OAC 治疗的患者中(不间断的 NOAC 和 INR≥2.0 持续 3 周的 VKA 治疗),仍有 2.7%发生 ICT,但两组之间无差异(P=0.22)。不同类型的 NOAC 之间无差异。ICT 的独立预测因素是栓塞史、高血压、BMI、无 OAC、肾功能、心房附壁血流减少和自发回声对比的存在。
NOAC 治疗似乎总体上有利于预防 ICT,尽管这可能是由于 VKA 治疗控制不佳以及 VKA 和 NOAC 患者的整体健康状况差异造成的。即使进行了有效的 OAC 治疗,仍会发生 ICT,这提示高危患者需要个体化 TEE 指导的 CV。