• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订后的强化敏感性理论的简短衡量标准-RSQ17。

A Short Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory - RSQ17.

机构信息

a University of Novi Sad.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2018 Apr 3;152(3):133-150. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2017.1419158. Epub 2018 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1080/00223980.2017.1419158
PMID:29377779
Abstract

The need for a research and practical tool, such as a short, reliable, and valid personality assessment test, suggests researchers to create shortened versions of original instruments. Reinforcement sensitivity questionnaire (RSQ) was created in line with some basic premises of revised Reinforcement sensitivity theory, which proposes three motivational and emotional systems: Behavioral inhibition system (BIS), responsible for scanning environment for potential threats, Behavioral activation system (BAS), responsible for aproaching behavior, and the Fight/Flight/Freeze system (FFFS), responsible for behavior in the present threat. RSQ comprises five scales: BIS, BAS, Fight, Flight, and Freeze. The aim of this study was to develop a short version of RSQ, which would be beneficial to both research and practical purposes. Item response theory analyses were used for item selection. The study comprised two samples of participants, whereby Sample 1 (N = 837, 34.6% male, aged 18 - 82, M = 31.63, SD = 13.54) served as the derivation sample, while Sample 2 (818 participants, 43.6% male, 18-75 years, M = 29.65, SD = 12.52) served as validation sample. Factorial validity of the short RSQ was examined on both Sample 1 and Sample 2. Convergent and divergent validity of the short RSQ was examined using RST-PQ, Jackson-5, BIS/BAS scales, and Big Five Inventory. The results point to satisfactory internal consistency, factorial validity, and construct validity of the short RSQ, suggesting that it is an adequate measure for research settings or other contexts which require the use of short personality questionnaires.

摘要

人们需要一种研究和实践工具,例如简短、可靠且有效的人格评估测试,这促使研究人员创建原始工具的缩短版本。强化敏感性问卷(RSQ)是根据修订后的强化敏感性理论的一些基本前提创建的,该理论提出了三个动机和情绪系统:行为抑制系统(BIS),负责扫描环境中的潜在威胁;行为激活系统(BAS),负责接近行为;以及战斗/逃跑/冻结系统(FFFS),负责当前威胁下的行为。RSQ 包括五个量表:BIS、BAS、战斗、逃跑和冻结。本研究的目的是开发一种简短的 RSQ 版本,这将有益于研究和实际应用。项目反应理论分析用于项目选择。该研究包括两个参与者样本,其中样本 1(N = 837,34.6%为男性,年龄 18-82 岁,M = 31.63,SD = 13.54)用作推导样本,而样本 2(818 名参与者,43.6%为男性,18-75 岁,M = 29.65,SD = 12.52)用作验证样本。在样本 1 和样本 2 上都检验了简短 RSQ 的因子有效性。使用 RST-PQ、Jackson-5、BIS/BAS 量表和大五人格量表检验了简短 RSQ 的收敛和发散有效性。结果表明,简短 RSQ 具有令人满意的内部一致性、因子有效性和结构有效性,表明它是研究环境或其他需要使用简短人格问卷的情境的合适衡量标准。

相似文献

1
A Short Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory - RSQ17.修订后的强化敏感性理论的简短衡量标准-RSQ17。
J Psychol. 2018 Apr 3;152(3):133-150. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2017.1419158. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
2
Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ-S).人格的强化敏感性理论问卷(RST-PQ-S)简短版的编制与验证。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Jul-Aug;103(4):535-546. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1801702. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation.人格问卷强化敏感性理论(RST-PQ):编制与验证
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1427-1440. doi: 10.1037/pas0000273. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Fractionating negative and positive affectivity in handedness: Insights from the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of personality.用利手区分消极和积极情感性:来自人格强化敏感性理论的见解。
Laterality. 2017 Jul;22(4):419-444. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2016.1213274. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
5
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ).《强化敏感性理论个性问卷(RST-PQ)波斯语版的心理测量特性》。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Apr;244:104211. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104211. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
6
Study of Validity and Reliability of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire in Turkish Community Sample.土耳其社区样本中强化敏感性问卷的效度和信度研究。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Aug 26;58(3):234-241. doi: 10.29399/npa.27369. eCollection 2021.
7
Sensitivity to rewards and punishments in karate athletes: an examination of the temperamental characteristics and profile of karate competitors according to the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory.空手道运动员对奖励和惩罚的敏感性:根据修订后的强化敏感性理论对空手道选手的气质特征和概况进行的考察。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Aug 26;16(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00971-w.
8
Preliminary Validation of the Pain Relief Motivation Scales.疼痛缓解动机量表的初步验证
Clin J Pain. 2024 Jan 1;40(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001170.
9
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Neuropsychological Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and Behavioral Approach System (BAS) assessment: a shortened Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire version (SPSRQ-20).神经心理学行为抑制系统(BIS)和行为趋近系统(BAS)评估:惩罚敏感性和奖励敏感性问卷(SPSRQ-20)的缩短版。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Nov;93(6):628-36. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.608760.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct validity of questionnaires for the original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory.原始版和修订版强化敏感性理论问卷的结构效度。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 21;13:1026894. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026894. eCollection 2022.
2
Study of Validity and Reliability of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire in Turkish Community Sample.土耳其社区样本中强化敏感性问卷的效度和信度研究。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Aug 26;58(3):234-241. doi: 10.29399/npa.27369. eCollection 2021.