1 School of Psychology, Bangor University.
2 Department of Psychology, Western University.
Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;29(3):403-417. doi: 10.1177/0956797617737128. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
Research suggests that stimuli that prime social concepts can fundamentally alter people's behavior. However, most researchers who conduct priming studies fail to explicitly report double-blind procedures. Because experimenter expectations may influence participant behavior, we asked whether a short pre-experiment interaction between participants and experimenters would contribute to priming effects when experimenters were not blind to participant condition. An initial double-blind experiment failed to demonstrate the expected effects of a social prime on executive cognition. To determine whether double-blind procedures caused this result, we independently manipulated participants' exposure to a prime and experimenters' belief about which prime participants received. Across four experiments, we found that experimenter belief, rather than prime condition, altered participant behavior. Experimenter belief also altered participants' perceptions of their experimenter, suggesting that differences in experimenter behavior across conditions caused the effect. Findings reinforce double-blind designs as experimental best practice and suggest that people's prior beliefs have important consequences for shaping behavior with an interaction partner.
研究表明,启动社会概念的刺激可以从根本上改变人们的行为。然而,大多数进行启动研究的研究人员未能明确报告双盲程序。由于实验者的期望可能会影响参与者的行为,我们想知道当实验者对参与者的情况不了解时,参与者和实验者之间的短暂预实验互动是否会对启动效应产生影响。最初的双盲实验未能证明社会启动对执行认知的预期影响。为了确定双盲程序是否导致了这一结果,我们独立地操纵了参与者对启动的接触和实验者对参与者接受的启动的信念。在四项实验中,我们发现,是实验者的信念,而不是启动条件,改变了参与者的行为。实验者的信念也改变了参与者对实验者的看法,这表明条件之间实验者行为的差异导致了这种效果。研究结果加强了双盲设计作为实验最佳实践的地位,并表明人们的先入为主的信念对与互动伙伴形成行为有重要影响。