Waggoner W F
J Dent Educ. 1986 Apr;50(4):225-9.
A survey of predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs in American dental schools was conducted to determine the extent of didactic and clinical training in pediatric conscious sedation. Fifty-four of 59 programs (92 percent) returned usable surveys. The results indicated that there exists a wide range of teaching practices, both in numbers and types of sedations experienced. Fifty-six percent of the respondents reported that students received some degree of clinical experience. Sedation was achieved most commonly with chloral hydrate or hydroxyzine administered orally. Predoctoral programs without an affiliated postdoctoral program were much more likely to practice conscious sedation than those that trained postdoctoral students. The reason most frequently listed for the nonuse of sedation in the predoctoral clinic was philosophical opposition to pharmacological management at this level of training. A majority of the respondents believed that improved monitoring practices and documentation of cases would result from the recent adoption by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry of guidelines for conscious sedation.
为了确定美国牙科学院博士前儿科牙科项目中儿童清醒镇静的理论教学和临床培训程度,开展了一项相关调查。59个项目中有54个(92%)返回了可用的调查问卷。结果表明,在经历的镇静数量和类型方面,存在广泛的教学实践差异。56%的受访者表示,学生获得了一定程度的临床经验。最常用口服水合氯醛或羟嗪来实现镇静。没有附属博士后项目的博士前项目比培养博士后学生的项目更有可能实施清醒镇静。在博士前诊所不使用镇静最常列出的原因是在这个培训水平上对药物管理存在理念上的反对。大多数受访者认为,美国儿科学会最近采用清醒镇静指南将带来更好的监测实践和病例记录。