Hardesty Douglas A, Montaser Alaa S, Carrau Ricardo L, Prevedello Daniel M
Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Neurosurg Sci. 2018 Jun;62(3):332-338. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04330-8. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the ventral skull base has greatly increased in popularity over the last two decades. So-called expanded EEA have opened corridors to pathology off-midline, including lesions within the cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave. A standard EEA exposure into the sphenoid sinus allows visualization of the medial cavernous sinus; a transpterygoid approach allows for surgical manipulation of the lateral cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave contents. Pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, and schwannomas are the most common pathologies in this region. This approach to the "front door" of the cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave should be considered complementary to traditional craniotomy techniques as each have benefits and limitations. Herein we review the published literature regarding endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid surgery for pathology in the lateral cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave, and the anatomical and functional limitations of these approaches.
在过去二十年中,经鼻内镜入路(EEA)治疗颅底腹侧病变的方法越来越受欢迎。所谓的扩大经鼻内镜入路开辟了进入中线外病变的通道,包括海绵窦和梅克尔腔(Meckel's cave)内的病变。标准的经鼻内镜入路进入蝶窦可显露海绵窦内侧;经翼突入路可对海绵窦外侧和梅克尔腔内的内容物进行手术操作。垂体腺瘤、脑膜瘤和神经鞘瘤是该区域最常见的病变。这种进入海绵窦和梅克尔腔“前门”的方法应被视为传统开颅手术技术的补充,因为每种方法都有其优缺点。在此,我们回顾了已发表的关于经鼻内镜经翼突手术治疗海绵窦外侧和梅克尔腔病变的文献,以及这些方法的解剖学和功能局限性。