• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面孔识别中文本空间频率使用的文化差异的时程。

Time Course of Cultural Differences in Spatial Frequency Use for Face Identification.

机构信息

Département de psychoéducation et de psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Québec, Canada.

Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):1816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19971-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-19971-1
PMID:29379032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5788938/
Abstract

Several previous studies of eye movements have put forward that, during face recognition, Easterners spread their attention across a greater part of their visual field than Westerners. Recently, we found that culture's effect on the perception of faces reaches mechanisms deeper than eye movements, therefore affecting the very nature of information sampled by the visual system: that is, Westerners globally rely more than Easterners on fine-grained visual information (i.e. high spatial frequencies; SFs), whereas Easterners rely more on coarse-grained visual information (i.e. low SFs). These findings suggest that culture influences basic visual processes; however, the temporal onset and dynamics of these culture-specific perceptual differences are still unknown. Here, we investigate the time course of SF use in Western Caucasian (Canadian) and East Asian (Chinese) observers during a face identification task. Firstly, our results confirm that Easterners use relatively lower SFs than Westerners, while the latter use relatively higher SFs. More importantly, our results indicate that these differences arise as early as 34 ms after stimulus onset, and remain stable through time. Our research supports the hypothesis that Westerners and Easterners initially rely on different types of visual information during face processing.

摘要

先前有几项关于眼球运动的研究提出,在进行面孔识别时,东方人比西方人会将注意力分散到更大的视野范围。最近,我们发现文化对面孔感知的影响深入到了眼球运动机制之外的其他机制,从而影响了视觉系统所采样信息的本质:也就是说,西方人比东方人更依赖于精细的视觉信息(即高空间频率;SFs),而东方人则更依赖于粗糙的视觉信息(即低 SFs)。这些发现表明文化会影响基本的视觉过程;然而,这些特定于文化的感知差异的时间起始和动态仍然未知。在这里,我们在西方白种人(加拿大)和东亚人(中国人)被试者进行面孔识别任务时,研究了 SF 使用的时间进程。首先,我们的结果证实了东方人比西方人使用相对较低的 SFs,而后者则使用相对较高的 SFs。更重要的是,我们的结果表明,这些差异早在刺激开始后 34 毫秒就出现了,并随着时间的推移保持稳定。我们的研究支持了这样一种假设,即西方人最初和东方人在进行面孔处理时会依赖不同类型的视觉信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/d5a3d2591b61/41598_2018_19971_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/00d891d71a96/41598_2018_19971_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/0e71bd884673/41598_2018_19971_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/7dc63e1de996/41598_2018_19971_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/d5a3d2591b61/41598_2018_19971_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/00d891d71a96/41598_2018_19971_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/0e71bd884673/41598_2018_19971_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/7dc63e1de996/41598_2018_19971_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9937/5788938/d5a3d2591b61/41598_2018_19971_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Time Course of Cultural Differences in Spatial Frequency Use for Face Identification.面孔识别中文本空间频率使用的文化差异的时程。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):1816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19971-1.
2
Culture shapes spatial frequency tuning for face identification.文化塑造了用于面部识别的空间频率调谐。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):294-306. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000288. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
3
Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.面部识别过程中的初始眼动是最佳的,且在不同文化中相似。
J Vis. 2015;15(13):12. doi: 10.1167/15.13.12.
4
Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.将文化置于“聚光灯”下,揭示了用于人脸识别的普遍信息使用。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 18;5(3):e9708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009708.
5
Investigating cultural diversity for extrafoveal information use in visual scenes.研究视觉场景中用于中央凹外信息利用的文化多样性。
J Vis. 2010 Jun 1;10(6):21. doi: 10.1167/10.6.21.
6
Inverting faces does not abolish cultural diversity in eye movements.倒置面孔并不会消除眼球运动中的文化差异。
Perception. 2010;39(11):1491-503. doi: 10.1068/p6750.
7
Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.文化差异对面孔特征和整体加工时间进程的影响。
Neuroscience. 2020 Oct 15;446:157-170. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
Culture shapes how we look at faces.文化塑造我们看待面孔的方式。
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003022.
9
A comparison of spatial frequency tuning for judgments of eye gaze and facial identity.用于判断目光注视和面部识别的空间频率调谐比较。
Vision Res. 2015 Jul;112:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Culture differences in neural processing of faces and houses in the ventral visual cortex.腹侧视觉皮层中面孔和房屋的神经加工的文化差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):227-35. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq060. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual grouping of individuals in social triads.社会三人组中个体的知觉分组。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03119-1.
2
Visual short-term memory, culture, and image structure.视觉短期记忆、文化与图像结构。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03094-7.
3
The impact of spatial frequency on hierarchical category representation in macaque temporal cortex.空间频率对猕猴颞叶皮层中层次类别表征的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Orientations for the successful categorization of facial expressions and their link with facial features.面部表情成功分类的指导原则及其与面部特征的联系。
J Vis. 2017 Dec 1;17(14):7. doi: 10.1167/17.14.7.
2
Developmental changes in the critical information used for facial expression processing.用于面部表情处理的关键信息的发育变化。
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 26.
3
A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing.一种用于面部处理的修订神经框架。
Commun Biol. 2025 May 25;8(1):801. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08230-5.
4
Differences in eye movements for face recognition between Canadian and Chinese participants are not modulated by social orientation.加拿大和中国参与者在面孔识别中的眼球运动差异不受社会取向的调节。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295256. eCollection 2023.
5
Do subtle cultural differences sculpt face pareidolia?细微的文化差异会塑造面部空想性错视吗?
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 May 4;9(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00355-y.
6
Race categorization in noise.噪声中的种族分类。
Iperception. 2022 Aug 30;13(4):20416695221119530. doi: 10.1177/20416695221119530. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Spatial frequency impacts perceptual and attentional ERP components across cultures.空间频率会影响跨文化的感知和注意事件相关电位成分。
Brain Cogn. 2022 Mar;157:105834. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105834. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
8
Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces.成人与儿童面部的人类分类诊断特征。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 19;12:775338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775338. eCollection 2021.
9
Rapid saccadic categorization of other-race faces.快速扫视异族面孔的分类。
J Vis. 2021 Nov 1;21(12):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.12.1.
10
The role of spatial frequencies for facial pain categorization.空间频率对面部疼痛分类的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 13;11(1):14357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93776-7.
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 24;1:393-416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035518.
4
Culture shapes spatial frequency tuning for face identification.文化塑造了用于面部识别的空间频率调谐。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):294-306. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000288. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
5
Atypical Time Course of Object Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中物体识别的非典型时间进程。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 18;6:35494. doi: 10.1038/srep35494.
6
The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.自然轮廓和面部大小对识别正立和倒立面孔的空间频率调谐的影响。
Psychol Res. 2017 Jan;81(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
7
Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.面部识别过程中的初始眼动是最佳的,且在不同文化中相似。
J Vis. 2015;15(13):12. doi: 10.1167/15.13.12.
8
A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.整体面部加工的荟萃分析与综述
Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1281-302. doi: 10.1037/a0037004. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
9
Affective and contextual values modulate spatial frequency use in object recognition.情感和语境价值调节物体识别中的空间频率使用。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 28;5:512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00512. eCollection 2014.
10
Mapping Face Recognition Information Use across Cultures.跨文化的人脸识别信息使用研究
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 20;4:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00034. eCollection 2013.