Raeissadat Seyed Ahmad, Rayegani Seyed Mansoor, Forogh Bijan, Hassan Abadi Porya, Moridnia Mahsa, Rahimi Dehgolan Shahram
Clinical Development Research Center of Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran.
Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Pain Res. 2018 Jan 4;11:111-117. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S142755. eCollection 2018.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease, imposing a great burden through pain and decreased function. There are many therapeutic modalities including non-pharmacologic choices and oral, topical, and intra-articular medications. New studies have shown promising results for ozone application in knee OA. Our aim was to compare the effects of ozone therapy versus hyaluronic acid (HA) intra-articular injection in knee OA patients.
In this randomized clinical trial, a total of 174 patients with more than 3 months of chronic pain or swelling in the knee joints along with consistent imaging findings were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups of HA and ozone, which were planned to undergo 3 weekly injections of HA (Hyalgan®) and 10 mL of a 30 μg/mL ozone solution, respectively. Patients were evaluated at baseline and 6 months after the last injection for pain, stiffness, and function using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire.
No major adverse events were detected in this study. Total WOMAC score decreased from 40.8±9.8 to 20.4±4.9 (<0.01) in the ozone group and from 38.5±7.9 to 17.1±4.2 (<0.01) in the HA group. A similar trend was observed in pain improvement according to VAS. Pain, stiffness, and function significantly improved in both the groups, but no between-group difference was found.
Although both ozone and HA can be effectively used for improving function and reducing pain in selected knee OA patients, neither of the two showed any superiority at 6-month follow-up.
膝关节骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见疾病,通过疼痛和功能减退带来巨大负担。有许多治疗方式,包括非药物选择以及口服、外用和关节内用药。新研究显示臭氧应用于膝关节OA有令人期待的结果。我们的目的是比较臭氧疗法与透明质酸(HA)关节内注射对膝关节OA患者的效果。
在这项随机临床试验中,共纳入174例膝关节慢性疼痛或肿胀超过3个月且影像学表现一致的患者,并随机分为HA组和臭氧组,计划分别每周注射1次HA(施沛特®)共3次和10 mL浓度为30μg/mL的臭氧溶液。在基线以及最后一次注射后6个月,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)问卷对患者的疼痛、僵硬和功能进行评估。
本研究未检测到重大不良事件。臭氧组的WOMAC总分从40.8±9.8降至20.4±4.9(<0.01),HA组从38.5±7.9降至17.1±4.2(<0.01)。根据VAS评估,疼痛改善情况呈现相似趋势。两组的疼痛、僵硬和功能均显著改善,但组间差异未发现。
虽然臭氧和HA均可有效用于改善特定膝关节OA患者的功能和减轻疼痛,但在6个月随访时两者均未显示出任何优势。