• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The efficacy of ultrasonography-guided oxygen-ozone therapy versus corticosteroids in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.超声引导下臭氧治疗与皮质类固醇治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(6):1455-1466. doi: 10.3233/BMR-240023.
2
The effects of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection compared to oxygen-ozone (O-O) injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导下皮质类固醇注射与臭氧(O-O)注射治疗膝骨关节炎患者的效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;37(9):2517-2527. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4147-6. Epub 2018 May 24.
3
Efficacy of two doses of intra-articular ozone therapy for pain and functional mobility in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized trial.两剂关节腔内臭氧疗法对膝关节骨关节炎疼痛和功能活动度的疗效:一项双盲随机试验
Adv Rheumatol. 2025 Mar 6;65(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s42358-025-00443-w.
4
Intra-Articular, Single-Shot Hylan G-F 20 Hyaluronic Acid Injection Compared with Corticosteroid in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.膝关节骨关节炎中关节内单次注射透明质酸凝胶Hylan G-F 20与皮质类固醇的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 1;98(11):885-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00544.
5
Inflammatory characteristics on ultrasound predict poorer longterm response to intraarticular corticosteroid injections in knee osteoarthritis.超声下的炎症特征可预测膝骨关节炎关节内皮质类固醇注射的长期反应较差。
J Rheumatol. 2010 Mar;37(3):650-5. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090575. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
6
Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎的关节内皮质类固醇治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD005328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub3.
7
Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.关节内注射皮质类固醇治疗膝关节骨关节炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD005328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.
8
Efficacy and Treatment Response of Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections in Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis.关节内注射皮质类固醇对有症状的膝关节骨关节炎患者的疗效及治疗反应
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Oct;25(10):703-714. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00541.
9
Comparison between intra-articular ozone and placebo in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.关节内注射臭氧与安慰剂治疗膝骨关节炎的比较:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0179185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179185. eCollection 2017.
10
Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.关节内注射皮质类固醇治疗膝关节骨关节炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Adequate Disinfection Techniques for Ultrasound-Guided Injections in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.肌肉骨骼康复中超声引导注射的充分消毒技术的影响:一项范围综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 5;15(7):933. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070933.
2
Oxygen-ozone therapy for musculoskeletal pain in rehabilitation: Evidence and future perspectives.康复中用于治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的氧-臭氧疗法:证据与未来展望。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(6):1423-1426. doi: 10.3233/BMR-245005.

本文引用的文献

1
Ozone Therapy versus Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Pain Relief in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Preliminary Findings on Molecular and Clinical Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial.臭氧治疗与透明质酸注射治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的分子和临床结果初步发现。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 15;24(10):8788. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108788.
2
Efficacy of Oxygen-Ozone Therapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.氧-臭氧疗法和富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Oct 1;12(4):e127121. doi: 10.5812/aapm-127121. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Pain Management and Rehabilitation for Central Sensitization in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.颞下颌关节紊乱中的中枢敏化的疼痛管理和康复:全面综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 12;23(20):12164. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012164.
4
Oxygen-Ozone Therapy for Reducing Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Serum Levels in Musculoskeletal and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.臭氧-氧气疗法在降低肌肉骨骼和颞下颌关节紊乱相关促炎细胞因子血清水平中的应用:全面综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 25;23(5):2528. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052528.
5
Role of Physical Exercise and Nutraceuticals in Modulating Molecular Pathways of Osteoarthritis.体育锻炼和营养保健品在调节骨关节炎分子途径中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 27;22(11):5722. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115722.
6
Oxygen-Ozone Therapy in the Rehabilitation Field: State of the Art on Mechanisms of Action, Safety and Effectiveness in Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders.氧-臭氧疗法在康复领域的应用:作用机制、安全性和有效性在肌肉骨骼疾病患者中的最新研究进展。
Biomolecules. 2021 Feb 26;11(3):356. doi: 10.3390/biom11030356.
7
The comparison effects of intra-articular injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), Plasma Rich in Growth Factor (PRGF), Hyaluronic Acid (HA), and ozone in knee osteoarthritis; a one year randomized clinical trial.富血小板血浆(PRP)、富含生长因子的血浆(PRGF)、透明质酸(HA)和臭氧关节内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的比较效果:一项为期一年的随机临床试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 3;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04017-x.
8
Long-term effects of intra-articular oxygen-ozone therapy versus hyaluronic acid in older people affected by knee osteoarthritis: A randomized single-blind extension study.关节腔内注射氧气-臭氧疗法与透明质酸对老年膝骨关节炎患者的长期影响:一项随机单盲延长研究。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(3):347-354. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181294.
9
Oxygen-Ozone Therapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.臭氧-氧气疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的系统评价:随机对照试验研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.043. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
The temporal effect of intra-articular ozone injections on pain in knee osteoarthritis.关节内臭氧注射对膝骨关节炎疼痛的时间效应。
Br Med Bull. 2019 Dec 11;132(1):33-44. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz028.

超声引导下臭氧治疗与皮质类固醇治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验。

The efficacy of ultrasonography-guided oxygen-ozone therapy versus corticosteroids in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Ankara Gaziler Phsycial Therapy and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(6):1455-1466. doi: 10.3233/BMR-240023.

DOI:10.3233/BMR-240023
PMID:39240624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11612948/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widely-known disease distinguished by the breakdown of joint cartilage, leading to pain and morning stiffness. In this context, the role of corticosteroids is well known, but there is still a gap of knowledge on the duty of oxygen-ozone therapy (O2-O3).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate for effectiveness of ultrasound-guided O2-O3 injections compared with corticosteroid injections among patients diagnosed with knee OA.

METHODS

This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on participants with knee OA who were randomly sorted into two groups: group A, undergoing corticosteroid group (n= 47) and group B, undergoing O2-O3 (n= 49) were injected within the knee joint under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score between baseline and 12-weeks post-injection. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale scores, joint effusion and a knee flexion ROM. Assessments were recorded at baseline and 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection. For the examination of intra- and inter-group variations at various time points, a repeated-measure analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was employed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six participants completed this study. Based on repeated measurement analysis of variance, a significant effect of time was found for all outcome measures in both groups. Both groups showed clinically significant improvements in knee pain, quality of life and, function. Baseline, 4-week post-injection and 12-week post-injection WOMAC scores (mean ± standard deviation) were 72.54 ± 18.89, 45,95 ± 13.30 and 37.10 ± 19.87 (p= 0.00, p= 0.00, p= 0.00; respectively) in the corticosteroid group, respectively and 68.23 ± 20.18, 42.99 ± 18.67, and 33.43 ± 18.24 (p= 0.00, p= 0.00, p= 0.00; respectively) in the ozone group, respectively. However, no significant group × time interaction was determined regarding all outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the efficacy of O2-O3 compared to steroid injections regarding functioning and pain relief among patients with diagnosed knee OA.

摘要

背景

骨关节炎(OA)是一种广为人知的疾病,其特征是关节软骨的破裂,导致疼痛和晨僵。在这种情况下,皮质类固醇的作用是众所周知的,但关于臭氧治疗(O2-O3)的作用仍存在知识空白。

目的

评估超声引导下 O2-O3 注射与皮质类固醇注射治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效。

方法

这是一项随机对照临床试验,纳入了被诊断为膝骨关节炎的患者,并将他们随机分为两组:A 组,接受皮质类固醇注射(n=47),B 组,接受超声引导下膝关节内 O2-O3 注射(n=49)。主要结局指标为注射后 12 周时 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎(WOMAC)评分的变化。次要结局指标包括视觉模拟评分、关节积液和膝关节屈曲 ROM。在基线和注射后 4 周和 12 周时进行评估。为了检查不同时间点的组内和组间变化,采用重复测量方差分析(双向 ANOVA)。

结果

96 名参与者完成了这项研究。基于重复测量方差分析,两组所有结局指标在时间上均有显著影响。两组患者的膝关节疼痛、生活质量和功能均有显著改善。皮质类固醇组的 WOMAC 评分在基线、注射后 4 周和 12 周时分别为 72.54±18.89、45.95±13.30 和 37.10±19.87(p=0.00、p=0.00、p=0.00;分别),臭氧组的 WOMAC 评分分别为 68.23±20.18、42.99±18.67 和 33.43±18.24(p=0.00、p=0.00、p=0.00;分别)。然而,在所有结局指标方面,均未确定组间×时间的交互作用。

结论

本研究表明,与皮质类固醇注射相比,臭氧治疗在诊断为膝骨关节炎的患者中具有更好的疗效,可改善其功能和缓解疼痛。