Relia Sachin, Thompson Nicolas R, Mehra Reena, Moul Douglas, Katzan Irene, Foldvary-Schaefer Nancy, Walia Harneet K
Sleep Disorders Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 920, Madison Avenue, Suite 200, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
Sleep Breath. 2018 Mar;22(1):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s11325-018-1626-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
The clinical-population impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) on depressive symptoms in sleep disordered breathing (SDB) awaits clear documentation. We hypothesized that depressive symptoms improve in response to PAP treatment in a large clinical setting, and that lower socio-economic status poses barriers to full therapeutic response.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of SDB patients attending a tertiary ambulatory sleep center between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015. Data extracted from electronic health records included Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores, demographic characteristics, PAP adherence, and medical history. Paired- and two-sample t tests were utilized to assess changes in PHQ-9 score according to PAP adherence. Linear regression models were constructed to evaluate the association of socioeconomic status (SES) and other clinical variables on PHQ-9 scores.
The cohort consisted of 1981 SDB patients (56.4 ± 13.3 years; 45.7% female; 76.2% Caucasian). Regardless of adherence, PAP therapy improved PHQ-9 scores (- 2.4 ± 4.6, p < 0.0001), with more robust responses in patients with baseline PHQ-9 scores > 10 (- 4.8 ± 5.7; p < 0.0001). Adherent patients had significantly greater improvement (- 2.8 ± 4.4 vs. 1.6 + 4.2, p < 0.0001), and even greater benefit if baseline PHQ-9 was > 10 (-6.0 ± 5.3 vs. - 3.8 ± 4.9, p < 0.001). Patients from lower socioeconomic status and greater depressive symptom had worse post-PAP PHQ-9 scores.
PAP therapy and adherence were associated with improvement in depressive symptom severity in this clinical cohort. Patients with lower socioeconomic status derived less therapeutic benefit, suggesting that they faced additional barriers to treatment effectiveness.
气道正压通气(PAP)对睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)患者抑郁症状的临床人群影响尚待明确记录。我们假设,在大型临床环境中,PAP治疗可改善抑郁症状,且社会经济地位较低会对充分的治疗反应构成障碍。
我们对2010年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间在一家三级门诊睡眠中心就诊的SDB患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从电子健康记录中提取的数据包括患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)评分、人口统计学特征、PAP依从性和病史。采用配对t检验和两样本t检验来评估根据PAP依从性PHQ-9评分的变化。构建线性回归模型以评估社会经济地位(SES)和其他临床变量与PHQ-9评分之间的关联。
该队列由1981例SDB患者组成(年龄56.4±13.3岁;45.7%为女性;76.2%为白种人)。无论依从性如何,PAP治疗均改善了PHQ-9评分(-2.4±4.6,p<0.0001),基线PHQ-9评分>10的患者反应更明显(-4.8±5.7;p<0.0001)。依从性好的患者改善更显著(-2.8±4.4对1.6+4.2,p<0.0001),如果基线PHQ-9>10则获益更大(-6.0±5.3对-3.8±4.9,p<0.001)。社会经济地位较低且抑郁症状较重的患者PAP治疗后的PHQ-9评分更差。
在该临床队列中,PAP治疗和依从性与抑郁症状严重程度的改善相关。社会经济地位较低的患者获得的治疗益处较少,表明他们在治疗效果方面面临额外障碍。