Björkqvist Johan, Pesonen Anu-Katriina, Kuula Liisa, Matinolli Hanna-Maria, Lano Aulikki, Sipola-Leppänen Marika, Tikanmäki Marjaana, Wolke Dieter, Järvelin Marjo-Riitta, Eriksson Johan G, Andersson Sture, Vääräsmäki Marja, Heinonen Kati, Räikkönen Katri, Hovi Petteri, Kajantie Eero
a Department of Public Health Solutions , National Institute for Health and Welfare , Helsinki and Oulu , Finland.
b Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital , Finland.
Chronobiol Int. 2018 Apr;35(4):555-564. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1420078. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
A preference for eveningness (being a "night owl") and preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation) are associated with similar adversities, such as elevated blood pressure, impaired glucose regulation, poorer physical fitness, and lower mood. Yet, it remains unclear if and how preterm birth is associated with circadian preference. The aim of this study was to assess this association across the whole gestation range, using both objective and subjective measurements of circadian preference. Circadian preference was measured among 594 young adults (mean age 24.3 years, SD 1.3) from two cohorts: the ESTER study and the Arvo Ylppö Longitudinal Study. We compared 83 participants born early preterm (<34 weeks) and 165 late preterm (34 to <37 weeks) with those born at term (≥37 weeks, n = 346). We also compared very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g) participants with term-born controls. We obtained objective sleep data with actigraphs that were worn for a mean period of 6.8 (SD 1.4) nights. Our primary outcome was sleep midpoint during weekdays and weekend. The sleep midpoint is the half-way time between falling asleep and waking up, and it represents sleep timing. We also investigated subjective chronotype with the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) in 688 (n = 138/221/329) ESTER participants. The MEQ consists of 19 questions, which estimates the respondent to be of a "morning", "evening," or "intermediate" chronotype, based on the Morningness-Eveningness Score (MES). We analyzed the data from the actigraphs and the MES with three linear regression models, and analyzed distribution of the chronotype class with Pearson χ2. There were no consistent differences across the study groups in sleep midpoint. As compared with those born at term, the mean differences in minutes:seconds and 95% confidence intervals for the sleep midpoint were: early preterm weekdays 11:47 (-8:34 to 32:08), early preterm weekend 4:14 (-19:45 to 28:13), late preterm weekdays -10:28 (-26:16 to 5:21), and late preterm weekend -1:29 (-20:36 to 17:37). There was no difference in sleep timing between VLBW-participants and controls either. The distribution of chronotype in the MEQ among all participants was 12.4% morningness, 65.4% intermediate, and 22.2% eveningness. The distribution of the subjective chronotype class did not differ between the three gestational age groups (p = 0.98). The linear regression models did not show any influence of gestational age group or VLBW status on the MES (all p > 0.5). We found no consistent differences between adults born early or late preterm and those born at term in circadian preference. The earlier circadian preference previously observed in those born smallest is unlikely to extend across the whole range of preterm birth.
偏好晚睡(即“夜猫子”)与早产(妊娠<37周)会引发类似的不良状况,如血压升高、血糖调节受损、身体素质较差以及情绪低落。然而,早产是否以及如何与昼夜节律偏好相关联仍不清楚。本研究的目的是通过昼夜节律偏好的客观和主观测量方法,评估整个妊娠期范围内的这种关联。对来自两个队列(ESTER研究和阿尔沃·耶尔佩奥纵向研究)的594名年轻人(平均年龄24.3岁,标准差1.3)进行了昼夜节律偏好测量。我们将83名极早早产儿(<34周)和165名晚期早产儿(34至<37周)与足月儿(≥37周,n = 346)进行了比较。我们还将极低出生体重儿(VLBW,<1500g)参与者与足月儿对照进行了比较。我们使用佩戴平均时长为6.8(标准差1.4)晚的活动记录仪获取客观睡眠数据。我们的主要结局指标是工作日和周末的睡眠中点。睡眠中点是入睡和醒来之间的中间时间,它代表睡眠时间。我们还在688名(n = 138/221/329)ESTER参与者中使用晨型-夜型问卷(MEQ)调查了主观昼夜类型。MEQ由19个问题组成,根据晨型-夜型得分(MES)估计受访者属于“晨型”“夜型”或“中间型”昼夜类型。我们使用三个线性回归模型分析了活动记录仪数据和MES,并使用Pearson卡方分析了昼夜类型类别的分布。各研究组在睡眠中点方面没有一致的差异。与足月儿相比,睡眠中点的分钟:秒平均差异及95%置信区间为:极早早产儿工作日11:47(-8:34至32:08),极早早产儿周末4:14(-19:45至28:13),晚期早产儿工作日-10:28(-26:16至5:21),晚期早产儿周末-1:29(-20:36至17:37)。VLBW参与者与对照组在睡眠时间上也没有差异。所有参与者中MEQ的昼夜类型分布为:晨型12.4%,中间型65.4%,夜型22.2%。三个胎龄组之间主观昼夜类型类别的分布没有差异(p = 0.98)。线性回归模型未显示胎龄组或VLBW状态对MES有任何影响(所有p>0.5)。我们发现极早早产或晚期早产儿与足月儿在昼夜节律偏好上没有一致的差异。先前在出生体重最小者中观察到的更早的昼夜节律偏好不太可能扩展到整个早产范围内。