Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者射频消融术后华法林治疗的卒中风险及模式:一项真实世界研究

Stroke risks and patterns of warfarin therapy among atrial fibrillation patients post radiofrequency ablation: A real-world experience.

作者信息

Zhang Juan, Liu Xingpeng, Liu Xiaoqing, Yin Xiandong, Wang Yanjiang, Lu Xiaoying, Yang Xinchun

机构信息

Cardiac Center, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(47):e8762. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008762.

Abstract

We assessed the thromboembolic risks of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who had undergone radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the CHADS2-VASc risk scoring system and further investigated the patterns of warfarin use for thromboprophylaxis according to patient thromboembolic risk scores.In this study, we analyzed the stroke risks of patients who had undergone RFA for AF at our hospital between March 2014 and June 2016 using the CHADS2, CHADS2-VASc, and Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio, Elderly (> 65 years) (HAS-BLED) scoring systems. We retrieved medications, co-morbidities, and initial warfarin dosage data. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients initiated with warfarin therapy for stroke prophylaxis in AF who had a CHADS2-VASc score of 0.Totally, 309 patients were initiated with warfarin therapy for stroke prophylaxis in AF post-RFA. The baseline warfarin dosage was 2.76 ± 0.61 mg. The baseline CHADS2-VASC score was 2.93 ± 1.96 and 40 (12.95%) had a CHADS2-VASC score of 0, 42 (13.6%) had a CHADS2-VASCscore of 1, and 227 (73.5%) had a CHADS2-VASC score ≥2. The baseline CHADS2 score was 2.17 ± 1.55 and 48 (15.5%) had a CHADS2 score of 0, 68 (22.0%) had a CHADS2 score of 1, and 193 (62.5%) had a CHADS2 score ≥2. The baseline HAS-BLED score was 1.25 ± 0.91 and 69 (22.3%) had a HAS-BLED score of 0, 121 (39.2%) had a HAS-BLED score of 1, and 119 (38.5%) had a HAS-BLED score ≥2. Patients aged <65 years or 65 years, male and female patients, patients with or without hypertension, coronary heart disease, or diabetes mellitus, and patients with or without previous stroke/transient ischemic attack differed significantly in stroke risks by CHADS2-VASC, CHADS2, and HAS-BLED scores for stroke risks. Patients with different baseline international normalized ratio differed significantly in CHADS2-VASC scores. Furthermore, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and statins were of statistical significance for stroke risks.The majority of AF patients post-RFAs was of high stroke risk and received warfarin thromboprophylaxis in accordance with national guidelines. Our findings suggest that low and intermediate stroke risk patients should be evaluated for stroke risks and risk factors so that tailored warfarin thromboprophylaxis therapy can be given and inappropriate use of warfarin in AF patients can be avoided.

摘要

我们使用CHADS2-VASc风险评分系统评估了接受过射频消融(RFA)的心房颤动(AF)患者的血栓栓塞风险,并根据患者的血栓栓塞风险评分进一步研究了用于血栓预防的华法林使用模式。在本研究中,我们使用CHADS2、CHADS2-VASc以及高血压、肾功能/肝功能异常、中风、出血史或易感性、国际标准化比值不稳定、老年(>65岁)(HAS-BLED)评分系统,分析了2014年3月至2016年6月期间在我院接受RFA治疗AF的患者的中风风险。我们获取了用药情况、合并症以及初始华法林剂量数据。主要结局是CHADS2-VASc评分为0的AF患者中接受华法林治疗以预防中风的患者百分比。

总共有309例AF患者在RFA术后接受华法林治疗以预防中风。基线华法林剂量为2.76±0.61mg。基线CHADS2-VASC评分为2.93±1.96,40例(12.95%)CHADS2-VASC评分为0,42例(13.6%)CHADS2-VASC评分为1,227例(73.5%)CHADS2-VASC评分≥2。基线CHADS2评分为2.17±1.55,48例(15.5%)CHADS2评分为0,68例(22.0%)CHADS2评分为1,193例(62.5%)CHADS2评分≥2。基线HAS-BLED评分为1.25±0.91,69例(22.3%)HAS-BLED评分为0,121例(39.2%)HAS-BLED评分为1,119例(38.5%)HAS-BLED评分≥2。年龄<65岁或65岁的患者、男性和女性患者、有或无高血压、冠心病或糖尿病的患者,以及有或无前驱中风/短暂性脑缺血发作的患者,在中风风险方面,CHADS2-VASC、CHADS2和HAS-BLED评分存在显著差异。不同基线国际标准化比值的患者在CHADS2-VASC评分上存在显著差异。此外,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂以及他汀类药物对中风风险具有统计学意义。

大多数RFA术后的AF患者中风风险较高,并根据国家指南接受华法林血栓预防。我们的研究结果表明,应评估低和中度中风风险患者的中风风险及危险因素,以便给予针对性的华法林血栓预防治疗,避免AF患者对华法林的不当使用。

相似文献

3
Stroke and bleeding risk co-distribution in real-world patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey.
Am J Med. 2014 Oct;127(10):979-986.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 13.
4
The impact of risk score (CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc) on long-term outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):681-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
5
Comparison of HAS-BLED and HAS-BED Versus CHADS and CHADSVASC Stroke and Bleeding Scores in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;119(7):1012-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
How Well Do Stroke Risk Scores Predict Hemorrhage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation?
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;118(5):697-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
10
Clinical update on the management of atrial fibrillation.
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Apr;33(4):422-46. doi: 10.1002/phar.1217.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Suboptimal Anticoagulant Management in Japanese Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Warfarin for Stroke Prevention.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Oct;26(10):2102-2110. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.04.030. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Usefulness of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Scores in the Prediction of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Study.
Am J Med. 2016 Aug;129(8):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
The changing characteristics of atrial fibrillation patients treated with warfarin.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Nov;40(4):488-93. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1244-0.
4
Implications for your practice: Important changes in the 2014 guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Postgrad Med. 2015 Jun;127(5):535-8. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.1029863. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Prediction of stroke or TIA in patients without atrial fibrillation using CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
Heart. 2014 Oct;100(19):1524-30. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305303. Epub 2014 May 23.
7
Stroke and bleeding risk co-distribution in real-world patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey.
Am J Med. 2014 Oct;127(10):979-986.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验