Van Oudtshoorn Joy Elizabeth, García-Arieta Alfredo, Santos Gustavo Mendes Lima, Crane Christopher, Rodrigues Clare, Simon Craig, Kim Ji Myoung, Park Sang Aeh, Okada Yusuke, Kuribayashi Ryosuke, Pfäffli Chantal, Nolting Arno, Lojero Iván Omar Calderón, Martínez Zulema Rodríguez, Hung Wen-Yi, Braddy April C, Leal Nancy Arciniegas, Triana Diego Gutierrez, Clarke Mitch, Bachmann Peter
Medicines Control Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2018;21(1):27-37. doi: 10.18433/J3X93K.
The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) based biowaiver is a scientific model which enables the substitution of in vivo bioequivalence studies with in vitro data as evidence of therapeutic equivalence subject to certain conditions. Despite being based on the same principles, BCS-based biowaivers are interpreted and regulated differently among international regulatory agencies. In this survey, the Bioequivalence Working Group (BEWG) of the International Generic Drug Regulators Programme (IGDRP) compared the criteria for BCS-based biowaivers applied by the participating regulators and organisations.
Differences and similarities regarding solubility, permeability, dissolution, excipients and fixed-dose combination products, were identified and compared in a detailed survey of each participant's criteria for BCS-based biowaivers. These criteria were determined based upon the participants' respective regulatory guidance documents, policies and practices.
This review has, with the exception of two participants who do not accept BCS-based biowaivers, revealed that most IGDRP participants interpret the BCS principles and conditions similarly but notable differences exist in the application of these principles. Conclusion: Although many similarities exist, this review identifies several opportunities for greater convergence of regulatory requirements amongst the surveyed jurisdictions. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
基于生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)的生物豁免是一种科学模型,在某些条件下,它能够用体外数据替代体内生物等效性研究,作为治疗等效性的证据。尽管基于相同的原则,但国际监管机构对基于BCS的生物豁免的解释和监管有所不同。在本次调查中,国际仿制药监管者计划(IGDRP)的生物等效性工作组(BEWG)比较了参与调查的监管者和组织应用的基于BCS的生物豁免标准。
在对每个参与者基于BCS的生物豁免标准进行详细调查时,确定并比较了溶解度、渗透性、溶出度、辅料和固定剂量复方产品方面的异同。这些标准是根据参与者各自的监管指南文件、政策和实践确定的。
本次综述发现,除了两名不接受基于BCS的生物豁免的参与者外,大多数IGDRP参与者对BCS原则和条件的解释相似,但在这些原则的应用上存在显著差异。结论:尽管存在许多相似之处,但本次综述确定了在所调查的司法管辖区之间,监管要求有更大趋同的几个机会。本文接受出版后审查。注册读者(见“读者须知”)可通过点击本期目录页上的“摘要”进行评论。