Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS), C/ Campezo 1. Edificio 8. Madrid, 28022, Spain.
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2021;24:113-126. doi: 10.18433/jpps31491.
The requirements to waive in vivo bioequivalence studies for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on the Biopharmaceutics Classifications System (BCS) are well known, and biowaivers[1] for other types of oral dosage forms based on pre-defined criteria may also be acceptable. Similarly, biowaivers for dosage forms such as injectable products may also be allowed if certain criteria are met. The current paper summarises the biowaiver requirements for oral solutions and suspensions, soft gelatin capsules and injectable products (intravenous injections, subcutaneous and intramuscular injections, emulsions for injection and micellar solutions for injection) among the participants of the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme (IPRP). A review of the requirements indicated that there was a trend towards convergence when the dosage form became less complex; however, the most common approach used by each of the jurisdictions was a case-by-case approach given that most jurisdictions do not have well defined guidelines to support all possible scenarios. Even in the simplest case of intravenous solutions, the acceptability of qualitative changes in excipients differ between the IPRP members. Notwithstanding the differences, the dissemination of the information is a first step towards regulatory convergence regarding biowaivers for certain dosage forms and should be useful for pharmaceutical companies currently developing generic medicinal products for IPRP jurisdictions.
基于生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)豁免体内生物等效性研究的即时释放固体制剂的要求是众所周知的,并且基于预定义标准的其他类型口服剂型的生物豁免[1]也可能是可以接受的。同样,如果满足某些标准,也可以允许注射剂型(如注射产品)的生物豁免。本文总结了国际药品监管机构计划(IPRP)仿制药生物等效性工作组(BEWGG)参与者中口服溶液和混悬剂、软明胶胶囊和注射剂(静脉注射、皮下和肌肉内注射、注射用乳剂和注射用胶束溶液)的生物豁免要求。对这些要求的审查表明,随着剂型变得不那么复杂,有趋同的趋势;然而,由于大多数司法管辖区没有明确的指导方针来支持所有可能的情况,因此每个司法管辖区最常用的方法都是逐案处理。即使在最简单的静脉溶液情况下,各 IPRP 成员之间对于赋形剂的定性变化的可接受性也存在差异。尽管存在差异,但信息的传播是朝着某些剂型的生物豁免监管趋同迈出的第一步,对于目前正在为 IPRP 司法管辖区开发仿制药的制药公司来说应该是有用的。