Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 May;47(4):1265-1276. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1158-y. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
This study examined patterns of asexuality in Chinese asexual people in terms of sexual activities, sexual/romantic attraction, and sexual desire. The sample included 227 (64 men and 163 women) asexual participants and 57 (26 men and 31 women) uncertain asexual participants recruited from social networks for asexual people. The control group included 217 (115 men and 102 women) heterosexual participants recruited from general social networks. Participants scoring 40 or higher on the Asexuality Identification Scale were classified as asexual. Asexual participants reported having less frequent masturbation, sexual intercourse experience, and sexual and romantic attraction compared to heterosexual participants. Lower sexual attraction among asexuals indicated that "people who experience little or no sexual attraction" would be a more appropriate definition of asexuality. The pattern of uncertain asexual participants' sexual/romantic attraction and sexual desire was intermediate between heterosexual and asexual participants. Asexual participants scored significantly lower on dyadic sexual desire and slightly lower on solitary sexual desire than heterosexual participants. There were significant differences in sexual activities and solitary sexual desire among romantic orientation categories. Homoromantic participants showed higher dyadic sexual desire and were more likely to engage in masturbation, indicating the heterogeneity among asexual people. The findings indicated that Chinese asexual people showed similar patterns of asexuality as in Western nations. Specifically, asexual people have little or no sexual attraction, non-partner-orientated sexual desire, and are heterogeneous in sexual activities and sexual desire. This implies similar mechanisms underlying the etiology of asexuality across cultures.
本研究从性行为、性/浪漫吸引和性欲望三个方面考察了中国无性恋者的无性恋模式。样本包括 227 名(64 名男性和 163 名女性)无性恋参与者和 57 名(26 名男性和 31 名女性)不确定无性恋参与者,他们都是通过无性恋者的社交网络招募而来。对照组包括 217 名(115 名男性和 102 名女性)异性恋参与者,他们是从一般社交网络中招募而来的。在性身份量表上得分达到 40 或以上的参与者被归类为无性恋者。与异性恋参与者相比,无性恋参与者报告说自慰、性经历和性吸引力的频率较低。无性恋者较低的性吸引力表明,“很少或没有性吸引力的人”可能是无性恋的更恰当定义。不确定无性恋者的性/浪漫吸引力和性欲望模式介于异性恋和无性恋者之间。无性恋者的二元性欲望得分明显低于异性恋者,孤独性欲望得分略低。性取向类别在性活动和孤独性欲望方面存在显著差异。同性恋参与者表现出更高的二元性欲望,更有可能自慰,这表明无性恋者存在异质性。研究结果表明,中国无性恋者的无性恋模式与西方国家相似。具体来说,无性恋者性吸引力低或没有,非伴侣导向的性欲望,以及在性活动和性欲望方面存在异质性。这表明跨文化背景下无性恋的病因存在相似的机制。