Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Pharmacie, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Pierre Bénite, France.
Université Lyon 1, EMR, 3738, Lyon, France.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/jep.12883. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: In the past 2 decades, there has been an increasing interest in simulation-based learning programs to prevent medication error (ME). To improve knowledge, skills, and attitudes in prescribers, nurses, and pharmaceutical staff, these methods enable training without directly involving patients. However, best practices for simulation for healthcare providers are as yet undefined. By analysing the current state of experience in the field, the present review aims to assess whether human simulation in healthcare helps to reduce ME.
A systematic review was conducted on Medline from 2000 to June 2015, associating the terms "Patient Simulation," "Medication Errors," and "Simulation Healthcare." Reports of technology-based simulation were excluded, to focus exclusively on human simulation in nontechnical skills learning.
Twenty-one studies assessing simulation-based learning programs were selected, focusing on pharmacy, medicine or nursing students, or concerning programs aimed at reducing administration or preparation errors, managing crises, or learning communication skills for healthcare professionals. The studies varied in design, methodology, and assessment criteria. Few demonstrated that simulation was more effective than didactic learning in reducing ME. This review highlights a lack of long-term assessment and real-life extrapolation, with limited scenarios and participant samples. These various experiences, however, help in identifying the key elements required for an effective human simulation-based learning program for ME prevention: ie, scenario design, debriefing, and perception assessment. The performance of these programs depends on their ability to reflect reality and on professional guidance.
Properly regulated simulation is a good way to train staff in events that happen only exceptionally, as well as in standard daily activities. By integrating human factors, simulation seems to be effective in preventing iatrogenic risk related to ME, if the program is well designed.
背景、目的和目标:在过去的 20 年中,人们对基于模拟的学习计划越来越感兴趣,以防止药物错误(ME)。为了提高医生、护士和药剂师的知识、技能和态度,这些方法可以在不直接涉及患者的情况下进行培训。然而,医疗保健提供者模拟的最佳实践方法尚未确定。通过分析该领域目前的经验状态,本综述旨在评估医疗保健中的人类模拟是否有助于减少 ME。
对 2000 年至 2015 年 6 月期间的 Medline 进行了系统综述,将“患者模拟”、“药物错误”和“模拟医疗保健”等术语联系起来。排除了基于技术的模拟报告,仅专注于非技术技能学习中的人类模拟。
选择了 21 项评估基于模拟的学习计划的研究,重点是药房、医学或护理学生,或涉及旨在减少管理或准备错误、管理危机或学习医疗保健专业人员沟通技巧的计划。这些研究在设计、方法和评估标准上有所不同。很少有研究表明模拟在减少 ME 方面比教学学习更有效。本综述强调了缺乏长期评估和现实生活外推,以及有限的场景和参与者样本。然而,这些各种经验有助于确定有效的基于人类模拟的 ME 预防学习计划所需的关键要素:即场景设计、讨论和感知评估。这些计划的性能取决于它们反映现实的能力和专业指导。
适当监管的模拟是培训仅在特殊情况下发生的工作人员以及标准日常活动的好方法。通过整合人为因素,模拟似乎可以有效地预防与 ME 相关的医源性风险,如果该计划设计合理。