Marie Relster Mette, Gaini Shahin, Møller Holger Jon, Johansen Isik Somuncu, Pedersen Court
a Department Infectious Diseases , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark.
b Medical Department, Infectious Diseases Division , National Hospital Faroe Islands , Torshavn , The Faroe Islands.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018 May;78(3):180-186. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2018.1431841. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality. This study aims to assess the utility of the soluble mannose receptor (sMR) as a biomarker of sepsis and mortality in patients hospitalized with suspected infection. Using an in-house ELISA assay the concentration of sMR was analyzed in the serum of patients from three prospective studies. Using Sepsis-3 guidelines, patients were stratified as no infection (NI, n = 68), verified infection without sepsis (NSEP, n = 133) and verified infection with sepsis (SEP, n = 190). Adverse outcome was assessed as death before 28 days. We show that the sensitivity of sMR to predict mortality [area under curve (AUC) = 0.77] exceeded the sensitivity of procalcitonin (PCT, AUC = 0.63), C-reactive protein (CRP, AUC = 0.61) and the macrophage soluble receptor, CD163 (sCD163, AUC = 0.74), while it was less accurate to predict diagnosis of sepsis [AUC(sMR) = 0.69 vs. AUC(PCT) = 0.79, AUC(CRP) = 0.71 and AUC(sCD163) = 0.66]. Median sMR was significantly higher in the group with SEP (0.55 mg/L), compared with the groups without sepsis (NI and NSEP) (0.39 mg/L, p < .0001), and among those who died compared to those who survived (0.89 mg/L vs. 0.44 mg/L, p < .0001). Our results, and the current literature, support further evaluation of sMR as a biomarker of sepsis and mortality among patients hospitalized with suspected infection.
脓毒症是导致死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在评估可溶性甘露糖受体(sMR)作为疑似感染住院患者脓毒症和死亡生物标志物的效用。使用内部酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)分析了来自三项前瞻性研究患者血清中的sMR浓度。根据脓毒症-3指南,将患者分为无感染(NI,n = 68)、确诊感染但无脓毒症(NSEP,n = 133)和确诊感染合并脓毒症(SEP,n = 190)。将不良结局评估为28天内死亡。我们发现,sMR预测死亡率的敏感性[曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.77]超过了降钙素原(PCT,AUC = 0.63)、C反应蛋白(CRP,AUC = 0.61)和巨噬细胞可溶性受体CD163(sCD163,AUC = 0.74),而其预测脓毒症诊断的准确性较低[AUC(sMR)= 0.69,而AUC(PCT)= 0.79,AUC(CRP)= 0.71,AUC(sCD163)= 0.66]。与无脓毒症组(NI和NSEP)(0.39 mg/L,p < 0.0001)相比,SEP组的sMR中位数(0.55 mg/L)显著更高,且死亡患者的sMR中位数(0.89 mg/L)高于存活患者(0.44 mg/L,p < 0.0001)。我们的结果以及当前文献支持进一步评估sMR作为疑似感染住院患者脓毒症和死亡生物标志物的价值。