Luo Hua-Chun, Fu Zhi-Chao, Cheng Hui-Hua, Lei Yong, Liao Shao-Guang, Feng Jing, Yin Qin, Chen Qun-Hua, Lin Gui-Shan, Zhu Jin-Feng, Xu Jian-Feng, Dian Wang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian medical university affiliated Fuzhou General Hospital Department of Medical, Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing Command PLA, Fuzhou Department of Medicine, Longyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Longyan Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Province Hospital, Fuzhou Department of Urology, Jinjiang Hospital, Quanzhou, China Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e9450. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009450.
How to define a clinical target volume (CTV) as small as possible for prostate cancer to reduce the dose received by normal organs is an interesting study. We conduct a research to analyze the clinical efficacy of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using reduced CTV in the treatment of prostate cancer. From January 2006 to June 2010, 78 patients with prostate cancer were treated with IMRT according to this institutional protocol. Of them, 18 had stage II tumors, 39 had stage III tumors, and 21 had stage IVa tumors. Clinical outcomes included overall survival, biochemical recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and acute and chronic injuries caused by radiotherapy. Risk factors were evaluated using the Cox regression model. As of December 31, 2014, all patients completed radiotherapy as planned. Myelosuppression was mostly grade 1, acute urinary injury was mostly grades 1 and 2, and intestinal injury was mostly grade 1. The 5-year follow-up rate was 91.0%. The overall, progression-free, biochemical recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 82.1%, 79.4%, 84.6%, and 94.9%, respectively. Tumor volumes defined by small target volumes and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were 274.21 ± 92.64 and 600.68 ± 113.72, respectively, representing a significant difference (P < .05). Age, prostate-specific antigen level, eastern cooperative oncology Group score, Gleason score, and volume of CTV were independent risk factors for mortality and disease progression. Our findings indicated that IMRT with reduced CTV have less acute and chronic injuries caused by radiation, particularly grade 3 or higher urinary and intestinal injuries, while ensuring survival benefits and protecting the hematopoietic function.
如何尽可能小地定义前列腺癌的临床靶区(CTV)以减少正常器官所接受的剂量是一项有趣的研究。我们开展了一项研究,分析使用缩小的CTV进行调强放射治疗(IMRT)在前列腺癌治疗中的临床疗效。2006年1月至2010年6月,78例前列腺癌患者按照本机构方案接受IMRT治疗。其中,18例为Ⅱ期肿瘤,39例为Ⅲ期肿瘤,21例为Ⅳa期肿瘤。临床结局包括总生存期、生化复发、无复发生存期以及放疗引起的急慢性损伤。使用Cox回归模型评估危险因素。截至2014年12月31日,所有患者均按计划完成放疗。骨髓抑制大多为1级,急性泌尿损伤大多为1级和2级,肠道损伤大多为1级。5年随访率为91.0%。总生存期、无进展生存期、无生化复发生存期和无远处转移生存期分别为82.1%、79.4%、84.6%和94.9%。由小靶区定义的肿瘤体积和放射治疗肿瘤学组定义的肿瘤体积分别为274.21±92.64和600.68±113.72,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。年龄、前列腺特异性抗原水平、东部肿瘤协作组评分、Gleason评分和CTV体积是死亡率和疾病进展的独立危险因素。我们的研究结果表明,缩小CTV的IMRT在确保生存获益和保护造血功能的同时,放疗引起的急慢性损伤较少,尤其是3级或更高等级的泌尿和肠道损伤。