Hillman D R, Prentice L, Finucane K E
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986 Apr;133(4):587-92. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1986.133.4.587.
The pattern of breathing was studied in 8 patients with acute severe asthma on admission to hospital and during recovery to determine how chest wall motion varied with the degree of air-flow obstruction (AO), the relationship between degree of AO and respiratory timing and ventilation, and whether the pattern suggested respiratory muscle fatigue when asthma was most severe. Pattern was assessed by simultaneous measurement of respired volumes (pneumotachygraph) and anteroposterior (AP) motion of lower rib cage and abdomen (magnetometers). There was a phase lag of AP rib cage relative to AP abdominal motion that was greatest in those with lowest FEV1 and progressively decreased during recovery. Fractional inspiratory time was decreased in severe asthma. Mean inspiratory flow was increased in moderately severe asthma but decreased when FEV1 was less than 25% predicted. Breathing pattern was no more variable during severe asthma than during recovery. We conclude that during severe AO the magnitude of phase lag of AP rib cage relative to AP abdominal motion reflects severity of asthma; respiratory drive is increased but is not associated with increased ventilation below an FEV1 of 25% predicted, and analysis of the breathing pattern provides no clear evidence of respiratory muscle fatigue.
对8例急性重症哮喘患者入院时及恢复期间的呼吸模式进行了研究,以确定胸壁运动如何随气流阻塞(AO)程度变化、AO程度与呼吸时间及通气之间的关系,以及在哮喘最严重时该模式是否提示呼吸肌疲劳。通过同时测量呼出量(呼吸流速仪)以及下胸廓和腹部的前后(AP)运动(磁力计)来评估呼吸模式。AP胸廓相对于AP腹部运动存在相位滞后,在FEV1最低的患者中最为明显,且在恢复过程中逐渐减小。重度哮喘时吸气分数降低。中度重症哮喘时平均吸气流量增加,但当FEV1低于预计值的25%时降低。重度哮喘期间的呼吸模式与恢复期间相比并无更多变化。我们得出结论,在严重AO期间,AP胸廓相对于AP腹部运动的相位滞后幅度反映了哮喘的严重程度;呼吸驱动增加,但在FEV1低于预计值的25%时与通气增加无关,并且对呼吸模式的分析未提供呼吸肌疲劳的明确证据。