Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
School of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Gerontologist. 2019 Mar 14;59(2):251-259. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx212.
Increasingly, researchers have recognized the heterogeneity with the growing population of older homeless adults. However, scant research has considered the complex pathways into first-time homelessness from the perspective of older adults themselves.
Through in-depth interviews, this constructivist grounded theory study aimed to address this gap by exploring the pathways of 15 adults, aged 50 years and older, into late-life homelessness.
Two divergent pathways were revealed: gradual and rapid. Individuals with gradual pathways endured many years of struggle related to poor housing conditions, lack of social support, and social distress. They had reached out for support on several occasions, with little success due to their limited social capital. In contrast, for individuals with rapid moves to homelessness, multiple unanticipated losses threatened their economic and social resources and they were propelled into homelessness with little warning. Despite having access to social networks to help buffer these losses, they preferred homelessness over asking for help and being perceived as dependent.
Our study revealed that different pathways into homelessness require divergent strategies of prevention and support. For individuals with gradual moves, strengthening pre-homeless social supports and addressing social distress may have mitigated the eventual loss of housing. For individuals with rapid pathways, homelessness may have been prevented if independence and self-sufficiency were less idealized in our society.
越来越多的研究人员认识到,随着老年无家可归者人口的增加,存在着异质性。然而,几乎没有研究从老年人自身的角度考虑首次无家可归的复杂途径。
通过深入访谈,本建构主义扎根理论研究旨在通过探索 15 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的成年人步入晚年无家可归的途径来填补这一空白。
揭示了两种不同的途径:渐进式和快速式。渐进式途径的个体经历了多年与住房条件差、缺乏社会支持和社会困扰有关的挣扎。他们曾多次寻求支持,但由于社会资本有限,收效甚微。相比之下,对于快速步入无家可归的个体,多次意外的损失威胁到了他们的经济和社会资源,他们几乎没有预警就陷入了无家可归的境地。尽管他们可以利用社交网络来帮助缓冲这些损失,但他们宁愿无家可归,也不愿寻求帮助并被视为依赖他人。
我们的研究表明,进入无家可归的不同途径需要不同的预防和支持策略。对于渐进式途径的个体,加强无家可归前的社会支持和解决社会困扰可能会减轻最终失去住房的影响。对于快速途径的个体,如果我们的社会不太理想化独立性和自给自足,那么无家可归可能是可以预防的。