Nguyen Minh-Nha Rhylie, Mosel Cassandra, Grzeskowiak Luke E
SA Pharmacy, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Adelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Level 6, AHMS, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Feb;9(2):123-155. doi: 10.1177/2042098617748868. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Medication errors represent a significant but often preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of interventions to reduce neonatal medication errors.
A systematic review was undertaken of all comparative and noncomparative studies published in any language, identified from searches of PubMed and EMBASE and reference-list checking. Eligible studies were those investigating the impact of any medication safety interventions aimed at reducing medication errors in neonates in the hospital setting.
A total of 102 studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, including 86 comparative and 16 noncomparative studies. Medication safety interventions were classified into six themes: technology ( = 38; e.g. electronic prescribing), organizational ( = 16; e.g. guidelines, policies, and procedures), personnel ( = 13; e.g. staff education), pharmacy ( = 9; e.g. clinical pharmacy service), hazard and risk analysis ( = 8; e.g. error detection tools), and multifactorial ( = 18; e.g. any combination of previous interventions). Significant variability was evident across all included studies, with differences in intervention strategies, trial methods, types of medication errors evaluated, and how medication errors were identified and evaluated. Most studies demonstrated an appreciable risk of bias. The vast majority of studies (>90%) demonstrated a reduction in medication errors. A similar median reduction of 50-70% in medication errors was evident across studies included within each of the identified themes, but findings varied considerably from a 16% increase in medication errors to a 100% reduction in medication errors.
While neonatal medication errors can be reduced through multiple interventions aimed at improving the medication use process, no single intervention appeared clearly superior. Further research is required to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of the various medication safety interventions to facilitate decisions regarding uptake and implementation into clinical practice.
用药错误是新生儿发病和死亡的一个重要原因,但往往是可以预防的。本系统评价的目的是确定减少新生儿用药错误的干预措施的有效性。
对通过检索PubMed和EMBASE以及检查参考文献列表所识别出的以任何语言发表的所有比较性和非比较性研究进行系统评价。符合条件的研究是那些调查旨在减少医院环境中新生儿用药错误的任何药物安全干预措施影响的研究。
共识别出102项符合纳入标准的研究,包括86项比较性研究和16项非比较性研究。药物安全干预措施分为六个主题:技术(n = 38;例如电子处方)、组织(n = 16;例如指南、政策和程序)、人员(n = 13;例如员工教育)、药学(n = 9;例如临床药学服务)、危害和风险分析(n = 8;例如错误检测工具)以及多因素(n = 18;例如先前干预措施的任何组合)。所有纳入研究中均存在明显的变异性,在干预策略、试验方法、评估的用药错误类型以及用药错误的识别和评估方式方面存在差异。大多数研究显示存在明显的偏倚风险。绝大多数研究(>90%)显示用药错误有所减少。在每个已识别主题中纳入的研究中,用药错误的中位数减少幅度相似,为50% - 70%,但结果差异很大,从用药错误增加16%到用药错误减少100%不等。
虽然可以通过旨在改善用药过程的多种干预措施减少新生儿用药错误,但没有一种干预措施明显更具优势。需要进一步研究来评估各种药物安全干预措施的相对成本效益,以便为临床实践中的采用和实施决策提供便利。