• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速时间比值在诊断颈内动脉起始部狭窄中的应用价值

Usefulness of acceleration time ratio in diagnosis of internal carotid artery origin stenosis.

作者信息

Nishihira Takahito, Takekawa Hidehiro, Suzuki Keisuke, Suzuki Ayano, Tsukahara Yuka, Iizuka Kentaro, Igarashi Haruki, Iwasaki Akio, Okamura Madoka, Hirata Koichi

机构信息

Stroke Division, Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.

Center of Medical Ultrasonics, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018 Jul;45(3):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s10396-018-0863-4. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10396-018-0863-4
PMID:29388010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6028849/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The acceleration time (AcT) ratio of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is increased in ICA stenosis. However, there are few reports that have directly compared the AcT ratio to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings.

METHODS

We evaluated 177 vessels with DSA and carotid artery ultrasonography. The AcT ratio was calculated as AcT of the ICA (ICA-AcT)/AcT of the ipsilateral common carotid artery (CCA). We evaluated the correlation of DSA-NASCET stenosis with the origin of the ICA or the peak systolic velocity (ICApsv) in the stenotic region, ICApsv/peak systolic velocity of the CCA (CCApsv), ICA-AcT, and AcT ratio. Sensitivity and specificity for stenosis ≥ 70% were calculated based on the ICApsv, ICApsv/CCApsv, ICA-AcT, and AcT ratio.

RESULTS

Using NASCET criteria, 34 vessels had 70% or greater stenosis. DSA-NASCET showed a significant positive correlation with ICApsv, ICApsv/CCApsv, ICA-AcT, and AcT ratio (p < 0.0001). When the cut-off value for ICApsv was set at 176 cm/s, ICApsv/CCApsv at 2.42, ICA-AcT at 0.095 s, and the AcT ratio at 1.35, the sensitivity was 97.1, 97.1, 82.4, and 97.1%, and the specificity was 94.4, 91.0, 83.2, and 83.2%, for DSA-NASCET ≥ 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AcT ratio is a beneficial parameter for evaluating ICA stenosis as well as ICApsv and ICApsv/CCApsv.

摘要

目的

颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄时,颈内动脉加速时间(AcT)比值会升高。然而,很少有报告直接将AcT比值与数字减影血管造影(DSA)结果进行比较。

方法

我们对177条血管进行了DSA和颈动脉超声检查。AcT比值计算为ICA的AcT(ICA-AcT)/同侧颈总动脉(CCA)的AcT。我们评估了DSA-NASCET狭窄与ICA起源或狭窄区域的收缩期峰值速度(ICApsv)、ICApsv/CCA的收缩期峰值速度(CCApsv)、ICA-AcT和AcT比值之间的相关性。基于ICApsv、ICApsv/CCApsv、ICA-AcT和AcT比值计算狭窄≥70%的敏感性和特异性。

结果

采用NASCET标准,34条血管存在70%或更高程度的狭窄。DSA-NASCET与ICApsv、ICApsv/CCApsv、ICA-AcT和AcT比值呈显著正相关(p< 0.0001)。当ICApsv的截断值设定为176 cm/s、ICApsv/CCApsv设定为2.42、ICA-AcT设定为0.095 s以及AcT比值设定为1.35时,对于DSA-NASCET≥70%,敏感性分别为97.1%、97.1%、82.4%和97.1%,特异性分别为94.4%、91.0%、83.2%和83.2%。

结论

AcT比值是评估ICA狭窄以及ICApsv和ICApsv/CCApsv的有益参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e253/6028849/0d34295666d6/10396_2018_863_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e253/6028849/82698e04aa02/10396_2018_863_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e253/6028849/8a7f86930126/10396_2018_863_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e253/6028849/0d34295666d6/10396_2018_863_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e253/6028849/82698e04aa02/10396_2018_863_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e253/6028849/8a7f86930126/10396_2018_863_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e253/6028849/0d34295666d6/10396_2018_863_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Usefulness of acceleration time ratio in diagnosis of internal carotid artery origin stenosis.加速时间比值在诊断颈内动脉起始部狭窄中的应用价值
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018 Jul;45(3):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s10396-018-0863-4. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Suitable methods of measuring acceleration time in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis.测量加速时间在诊断颈内动脉狭窄中的适用方法。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2020 Apr;47(2):327-333. doi: 10.1007/s10396-019-01000-x. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Usefulness of "AcT ratio" in diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study.“AcT 比值”在诊断颈内动脉狭窄中的作用:一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2024 Apr;51(2):347-353. doi: 10.1007/s10396-024-01409-z. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
4
Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria.通过双功超声标准确定颈动脉支架内狭窄情况。
J Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;12(3):346-53. doi: 10.1583/04-1527.1.
5
[Three-dimensional DSA imaging and 3-dimensional measurement of cross section for internal carotid artery stenosis].[三维数字减影血管造影成像及颈内动脉狭窄横断面三维测量]
No To Shinkei. 2003 Aug;55(8):661-7.
6
Direct B-mode NASCET-style stenosis measurement and Doppler ultrasound as parameters for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.直接B模式NASCET式狭窄测量和多普勒超声作为评估颈内动脉狭窄的参数。
Australas Radiol. 2002 Mar;46(1):52-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00994.x.
7
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.支架置入后颈动脉的双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038.
8
Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?颈动脉支架置入术:是否需要修订超声速度标准?
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan;39(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.10.043.
9
B-mode ultrasound measurement of carotid bifurcation stenoses: is it reliable?B 型超声测量颈动脉分叉处狭窄:它可靠吗?
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;36(2):123-35. doi: 10.1177/153857440203600207.
10
Measurement of carotid stenosis using duplex ultrasonography with a microconvex array transducer: a validation with cerebral angiography.应用微凸阵探头的双功能超声检测颈动脉狭窄:与脑血管造影术的对照验证。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):e360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.03.028. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Arterial Blood-Flow Acceleration Time on Doppler Ultrasound Waveforms: What Are We Talking About?多普勒超声波形上的动脉血流加速时间:我们在讨论什么?
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 31;12(3):1097. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031097.
2
Suitable methods of measuring acceleration time in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis.测量加速时间在诊断颈内动脉狭窄中的适用方法。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2020 Apr;47(2):327-333. doi: 10.1007/s10396-019-01000-x. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceleration time ratio for the assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2014 Jan;41(1):63-7. doi: 10.1007/s10396-013-0471-2. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
2
Asymptomatic carotid artery disease: A personalized approach to management.无症状性颈动脉疾病:个性化管理方法
Cleve Clin J Med. 2015 Dec;82(12):855-63. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.82a.14144.
3
Usefulness of acceleration time for internal carotid artery origin stenosis.颈内动脉起始部狭窄时加速时间的效用
Ann Vasc Dis. 2013;6(3):590-5. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.13-00053. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
4
Critical appraisal of the Carotid Duplex Consensus criteria in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉双功能超声共识标准在诊断颈动脉狭窄中的评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;53(1):53-9; discussion 59-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.045. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
5
Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom.英国颈动脉超声检查报告联合建议
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Mar;37(3):251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
6
Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography.利用能量多普勒双功超声诊断颈内动脉狭窄超过70%。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Feb;22(2):413-7.
7
Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST).近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术随机试验:医学研究委员会欧洲颈动脉外科试验(ECST)的最终结果
Lancet. 1998 May 9;351(9113):1379-87.
8
Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.颈动脉内膜切除术对有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者的有益作用。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):445-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701.