Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Stoczek 1c, 17-230, Białowieża, Poland.
Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Kraków, Poland.
Conserv Biol. 2018 Aug;32(4):808-816. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13088. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
Understanding how the relationships between large carnivores and humans have evolved and have been managed through centuries can provide relevant insights for wildlife conservation. The management history of many large carnivores has followed a similar pattern, from game reserved for nobility, to persecuted pests, to conservation targets. We reconstructed the history of brown bear (Ursus arctos) management in Białowieża Forest (Poland and Belarus) based on a detailed survey of historical literature and Russian archives. From the end of the Middle Ages to the end of 18th century, the brown bear was considered "animalia superiora" (i.e., game exclusively reserved for nobility and protected by law). Bears, also a source of public entertainment, were not regarded as a threat. Effective measures to prevent damages to traditional forest beekeeping were already in practice. In the beginning of 19th century, new game-management approaches allowed most forest officials to hunt bears, which became the primary target of hunters due to their valuable pelt. This, together with an effective anticarnivore policy enhanced by bounties, led to bear extirpation in 1879. Different approaches to scientific game management appeared (planned extermination of predators and hunting levels that would maintain stable populations), as did the first initiatives to protect bears from cruel treatment in captivity. Bear reintroduction in Białowieża Forest began in 1937 and represented the world's first reintroduction of a large carnivore motivated by conservation goals. The outbreak of World War II spoiled what might have been a successful project; reproduction in the wild was documented for 8 years and bear presence for 13. Soft release of cubs born in captivity inside the forest but freely roaming with minimal human contact proved successful. Release of captive human-habituated bears, feeding of these bears, and a lack of involvement of local communities were weaknesses of the project. Large carnivores are key components of ecosystem-function restoration, and site-specific histories provide important lessons in how to preserve them for the future.
了解大型食肉动物与人类之间的关系是如何随着时间的推移而演变的,并通过几个世纪的管理得以维系,这可以为野生动物保护提供相关的见解。许多大型食肉动物的管理历史都遵循着相似的模式,从贵族的猎物,到被迫害的害虫,再到保护目标。我们根据对历史文献和俄罗斯档案的详细调查,重建了白俄罗斯比亚沃维耶扎森林(波兰和白俄罗斯)的棕熊(Ursus arctos)管理历史。从中世纪末到 18 世纪末,棕熊被认为是“动物界的高级动物”(即仅为贵族保留并受法律保护的猎物)。棕熊也是公众娱乐的来源,并不被视为威胁。防止传统森林养蜂业受损的有效措施已经在实施。19 世纪初,新的猎物管理方法允许大多数森林官员猎杀棕熊,由于其有价值的皮毛,棕熊成为了猎人的主要目标。再加上通过赏金加强的有效的反食肉动物政策,导致棕熊于 1879 年灭绝。出现了不同的科学猎物管理方法(有计划地消灭捕食者和维持稳定种群的狩猎水平),以及保护熊免受囚禁中残酷对待的首批倡议。1937 年,白俄罗斯比亚沃维耶扎森林开始重新引入棕熊,这是世界上首次出于保护目的重新引入大型食肉动物。第二次世界大战的爆发破坏了这个原本可能成功的项目;在野外繁殖的情况记录了 8 年,熊的存在记录了 13 年。在森林中自由漫游、与人类接触最少的圈养幼崽的软释放被证明是成功的。释放圈养的、与人类习惯的棕熊、给这些棕熊喂食,以及缺乏当地社区的参与是该项目的弱点。大型食肉动物是生态系统功能恢复的关键组成部分,特定地点的历史为如何为未来保护它们提供了重要的经验教训。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017-12-11
Conserv Biol. 2021-8
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020-7-6
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-11-30