Sahlén Veronica, Ordiz Andrés, Swenson Jon E, Støen Ole Gunnar
Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway; Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 1;10(4):e0121576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121576. eCollection 2015.
Carnivore-human encounters that result in human injury present a conservation and management challenge and it is therefore important to understand under what conditions such incidents occur. Females with cubs are often involved when humans are injured by brown bears Ursus arctos. In Scandinavia, this is particularly true for unarmed recreational forest users. Our aim was to document behavioural differences between single bears and females with cubs in order to develop recommendations to minimize the risk of injuries to recreational forest users. We documented the reactions of GPS-collared females with cubs and single brown bears to experimental approaches by humans to 50 m from the bear on 42 and 108 occasions, respectively. The majority of females with cubs (95%) and single bears (89%) left when approached. Bears that left were passed at shorter distances and were in more open areas than those that stayed. Both groups had similar flight initiation distances, which were longer for bears that were active at the time of the disturbance. Females with cubs selected more open habitat than single bears, also for the new site they selected following disturbance. Females with cubs, particularly active females with cubs of the year, moved greater distances and spent more time active following the approach. Females with cubs and single bears were seen or heard in 26% and 14% of the approaches, respectively. None of the bears displayed any aggressive behaviour during the approaches. Females with cubs selected more open habitat, perhaps predisposing them to encountering people that are not involved in hunting activities, which might be the primary explanation why females with cubs are most frequently involved when unarmed people are injured by bears in Scandinavia. To mitigate injury risks, one must consider factors that bring bears closer to human activity in the first place.
导致人类受伤的食肉动物与人类的相遇给保护和管理带来了挑战,因此了解此类事件在何种条件下发生很重要。当人类被棕熊( Ursus arctos)伤害时,带幼崽的雌性棕熊常常牵涉其中。在斯堪的纳维亚半岛,对于 unarmed 的休闲森林使用者来说尤其如此。我们的目的是记录单身熊和带幼崽的雌性熊之间的行为差异,以便制定建议,将休闲森林使用者受伤的风险降至最低。我们分别记录了 42 次和 108 次带幼崽的 GPS 项圈佩戴雌性棕熊和单身棕熊对人类从距熊 50 米处进行的实验性接近的反应。大多数带幼崽的雌性棕熊(95%)和单身熊(89%)在被接近时离开了。离开的熊比起留下的熊,被经过时的距离更近且处于更开阔的区域。两组熊的逃跑起始距离相似,对于在干扰发生时处于活动状态的熊来说距离更长。带幼崽的雌性棕熊比起单身熊选择了更开阔的栖息地,在受到干扰后它们选择的新地点也是如此。带幼崽的雌性棕熊,尤其是带着当年幼崽的活跃雌性棕熊,在被接近后移动的距离更远且活动时间更长。在 26%和 14%的接近过程中分别看到或听到了带幼崽的雌性棕熊和单身熊。在接近过程中没有一只熊表现出任何攻击行为。带幼崽的雌性棕熊选择了更开阔的栖息地,这可能使它们更容易遇到不参与狩猎活动的人,这也许是在斯堪的纳维亚半岛 unarmed 的人被熊伤害时带幼崽的雌性棕熊最常牵涉其中的主要原因。为了降低受伤风险,首先必须考虑那些使熊更接近人类活动的因素。 (注:unarmed 未找到合适中文对应词,保留原文)