Suppr超能文献

患者参与抗精神病药物处方的障碍与促进因素的定性系统评价

Qualitative systematic review of barriers and facilitators to patient-involved antipsychotic prescribing.

作者信息

Pedley Rebecca, McWilliams Caitlin, Lovell Karina, Brooks Helen, Rushton Kelly, Drake Richard J, Rumbold Barnaby, Bell Vicky, Bee Penny

机构信息

Division of Nursing,Midwifery and Social Work,School of Health Sciences,Faculty of Biology,Medicine and Health,The University of Manchester,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre,Room 6.306 Jean McFarlane Building,Oxford Road,Manchester,M13 9PL.

Division of Nursing,Midwifery and Social Work,School of Health Sciences,Faculty of Biology,Medicine and Health,The University of Manchester,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre,Oxford Road,Manchester,M13 9PL.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2018 Jan;4(1):5-14. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2017.5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite policy and practice mandates for patient involvement, people with serious mental illness often feel marginalised in decisions about antipsychotic medication. Aims To examine stakeholder perspectives of barriers and facilitators to involving people with serious mental illness in antipsychotic prescribing decisions.

METHOD

Systematic thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

Synthesis of 29 studies identified the following key influences on involvement: patient's capability, desire and expectation for involvement, organisational context, and the consultation setting and processes.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal patient involvement in antipsychotic decisions demands that individual and contextual barriers are addressed. There was divergence in perceived barriers to involvement identified by patients and prescribers. For example, patients felt that lack of time in consultations was a barrier to involvement, something seldom raised by prescribers, who identified organisational barriers. Patients must understand their rights to involvement and the value of their expertise. Organisational initiatives should mandate prescriber responsibility to overcome barriers to involvement. Declaration of interest None.

摘要

背景

尽管有政策和实践要求患者参与,但患有严重精神疾病的人在抗精神病药物治疗决策中往往感到被边缘化。目的:探讨利益相关者对阻碍和促进严重精神疾病患者参与抗精神病药物处方决策的看法。

方法

系统的主题综合分析。

结果

对29项研究的综合分析确定了对参与的以下关键影响因素:患者的参与能力、意愿和期望、组织背景以及咨询环境和过程。

结论

要使患者最佳地参与抗精神病药物决策,就需要消除个人和背景方面的障碍。患者和开处方者所认识到的参与障碍存在差异。例如,患者认为咨询时时间不足是参与的障碍,而开处方者很少提到这一点,他们指出的是组织方面的障碍。患者必须了解自己的参与权利及其专业知识的价值。组织应规定开处方者有责任克服参与障碍。利益声明:无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/180a/6020265/cc93c12d3661/S2056472417000059_fig1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Clinicians' views of treatment types for first episode psychosis delivered in a randomised controlled trial (MAPS).
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 7;24:100421. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100421. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Understanding young peoples' and family members' views of treatment for first episode psychosis in a randomised controlled trial (MAPS).
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 7;24:100417. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100417. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Patients' experiences of long-acting injectable antipsychotics: a qualitative study.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Jul 3;15:1797-1804. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S206154. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/wps.20412.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
6
Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: beyond the micro-social.
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1002-14. doi: 10.1111/hex.12392. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
7
An exploratory study of the patient experience of pharmacist supplementary prescribing in a secondary care mental health setting.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2015 Apr-Jun;13(2):553. doi: 10.18549/pharmpract.2015.02.553. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验