The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.
School of Life Science and Technology, Center for Information in BioMedicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 May;39(5):2121-2132. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23992. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
Traditional task-evoked brain activations are based on detection and estimation of signal change from the mean signal. By contrast, the low-frequency steady-state brain response (lfSSBR) reflects frequency-tagging activity at the fundamental frequency of the task presentation and its harmonics. Compared to the activity at these resonant frequencies, brain responses at nonresonant frequencies are largely unknown. Additionally, because the lfSSBR is defined by power change, we hypothesize using Parseval's theorem that the power change reflects brain signal variability rather than the change of mean signal. Using a face recognition task, we observed power increase at the fundamental frequency (0.05 Hz) and two harmonics (0.1 and 0.15 Hz) and power decrease within the infra-slow frequency band (<0.1 Hz), suggesting a multifrequency energy reallocation. The consistency of power and variability was demonstrated by the high correlation (r > .955) of their spatial distribution and brain-behavior relationship at all frequency bands. Additionally, the reallocation of finite energy was observed across various brain regions and frequency bands, forming a particular spatiotemporal pattern. Overall, results from this study strongly suggest that frequency-specific power and variability may measure the same underlying brain activity and that these results may shed light on different mechanisms between lfSSBR and brain activation, and spatiotemporal characteristics of energy reallocation induced by cognitive tasks.
传统的任务诱发脑激活是基于检测和估计来自平均信号的信号变化。相比之下,低频稳态脑响应 (lfSSBR) 反映了任务呈现的基本频率及其谐波的频率标记活动。与这些共振频率的活动相比,非共振频率的脑反应在很大程度上是未知的。此外,由于 lfSSBR 是由功率变化定义的,我们假设使用 Parseval 定理,即功率变化反映了脑信号的可变性,而不是平均信号的变化。使用人脸识别任务,我们观察到基本频率 (0.05 Hz) 和两个谐波 (0.1 和 0.15 Hz) 的功率增加以及亚慢频带 (<0.1 Hz) 内的功率降低,表明存在多频能量再分配。在所有频段,功率和可变性的一致性通过其空间分布和脑-行为关系的高相关性 (r > .955) 得到证明。此外,在不同的大脑区域和频率带中观察到有限能量的再分配,形成特定的时空模式。总的来说,这项研究的结果强烈表明,特定频率的功率和可变性可能测量相同的潜在脑活动,这些结果可能揭示了 lfSSBR 和大脑激活之间的不同机制,以及认知任务引起的能量再分配的时空特征。