• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性缺血性脑卒中的早期降压治疗与临床结局:基于基线血压的亚组分析。

Early antihypertensive treatment and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: subgroup analysis by baseline blood pressure.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine.

Johns Hopkins University, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2018 Jun;36(6):1372-1381. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001690.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000001690
PMID:29389742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6368851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We studied the effect of early antihypertensive treatment on death, major disability, and vascular events among patients with acute ischemic stroke according to their baseline SBP.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 4071 acute ischemic stroke patients with SBP between 140 and less than 220 mmHg to receive antihypertensive treatment or to discontinue all antihypertensive medications during hospitalization. A composite primary outcome of death and major disability and secondary outcomes were compared between treatment and control stratified by baseline SBP levels of less than 160, 160-179, and at least 180 mmHg.

RESULTS

At 24 h after randomization, differences in SBP reductions were 8.8, 8.6 and 7.8 mmHg between the antihypertensive treatment and control groups among patients with baseline SBP less than 160, 160-179, and at least 180 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001 among subgroups). At day 14 or hospital discharge, the primary and secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the treatment and control groups among subgroups. However, there was a significant interaction between antihypertensive treatment and baseline SBP subgroups on death (P = 0.02): odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.42 (0.74-7.89) in patients with baseline SBP less than 60 mmHg and 0.34 (0.11-1.09) in those with baseline SBP at least 180 mmHg. At the 3-month follow-up, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the treatment and control groups by baseline SBP levels.

CONCLUSION

Early antihypertensive treatment had a neutral effect on clinical outcomes among acute ischemic stroke patients with various baseline SBP levels. Future clinical trials are warranted to test BP-lowering effects in acute ischemic stroke patients by baseline SBP levels.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01840072.

摘要

背景

我们根据基线收缩压(SBP)研究了急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期降压治疗对死亡、主要残疾和血管事件的影响。

方法

我们将 4071 例 SBP 为 140 至 220mmHg 的急性缺血性脑卒中患者随机分为降压治疗组或住院期间停用所有降压药物组。比较治疗组和对照组之间基线 SBP<160mmHg、160-179mmHg 和至少 180mmHg 患者的复合主要结局(死亡和主要残疾)和次要结局。

结果

随机分组后 24 小时,基线 SBP<160mmHg、160-179mmHg 和至少 180mmHg 的患者降压治疗组与对照组之间 SBP 降低幅度分别为 8.8、8.6 和 7.8mmHg(亚组间 P<0.001)。第 14 天或出院时,各亚组治疗组和对照组之间主要和次要结局无显著差异。然而,降压治疗与基线 SBP 亚组之间的死亡存在显著交互作用(P=0.02):基线 SBP<60mmHg 的患者比值比(95%可信区间)为 2.42(0.74-7.89),而基线 SBP 至少 180mmHg 的患者比值比为 0.34(0.11-1.09)。3 个月随访时,各亚组治疗组和对照组之间主要和次要临床结局无显著差异。

结论

在不同基线 SBP 水平的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中,早期降压治疗对临床结局无影响。有必要开展未来的临床试验,根据基线 SBP 水平测试急性缺血性脑卒中患者的降压效果。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01840072。

相似文献

1
Early antihypertensive treatment and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: subgroup analysis by baseline blood pressure.急性缺血性脑卒中的早期降压治疗与临床结局:基于基线血压的亚组分析。
J Hypertens. 2018 Jun;36(6):1372-1381. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001690.
2
Blood pressure reduction in acute ischemic stroke according to time to treatment: a subgroup analysis of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial.急性缺血性卒中按治疗时间分层的血压降低情况:中国急性缺血性卒中降压试验的亚组分析
J Hypertens. 2017 Jun;35(6):1244-1251. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001288.
3
Effects of immediate blood pressure reduction on death and major disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the CATIS randomized clinical trial.即刻降压对急性缺血性脑卒中患者死亡和主要残疾的影响:CATIS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):479-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282543.
4
Early Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Various Severities: A Subgroup Analysis of the CATIS Trial.不同严重程度急性缺血性卒中的早期血压降低:CATIS试验的亚组分析
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(3-4):186-95. doi: 10.1159/000444722. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Immediate Antihypertensive Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With or Without History of Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the CATIS Randomized Clinical Trial.伴有或不伴有高血压病史的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的即刻降压治疗:CATIS 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e198103. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8103.
6
Magnitude of Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Early Achieved Blood Pressure and Clinical Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中后收缩压降低幅度与早期血压达标及临床结局的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030692. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030692. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
7
Efficacy of Immediate Antihypertensive Treatment in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Different Blood Pressure Genetic Variants.急性缺血性脑卒中伴不同血压遗传变异患者的即刻降压治疗效果。
Hypertension. 2024 Mar;81(3):658-667. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21851. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
8
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 2. Effects at different baseline and achieved blood pressure levels--overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:2. 不同基线血压和血压控制水平的影响——随机试验的概述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2296-304. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000379.
9
Effect of Immediate Antihypertensive Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Different Renal Function Status.即刻降压治疗对不同肾功能状态急性缺血性卒中患者临床结局的影响
Hypertension. 2023 Jan;80(1):204-213. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20202. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
Achieved diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure at target systolic blood pressure (120-140 mmHg) and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials.在高危患者中实现了目标收缩压(120-140mmHg)下的舒张压和脉压,并取得了心血管结局:ONTARGET 和 TRANSCEND 试验的结果。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3105-3114. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy287.

引用本文的文献

1
Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.老年人停用抗高血压药物
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 31;3(3):CD012572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012572.pub3.
2
Clinical practice guideline for the management of hypertension in China.《中国高血压防治临床指南》
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Dec 20;137(24):2907-2952. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003431. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3
2023 Guideline for the management of hypertension in the elderly population in China.《中国老年高血压管理指南(2023年版)》
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Jun 28;21(6):589-630. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.06.001.
4
2022 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology and the Taiwan Hypertension Society for the Management of Hypertension.台湾心脏病学会与台湾高血压学会2022年高血压管理指南
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022 May;38(3):225-325. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202205_38(3).20220321A.
5
Antihypertensive use for stroke in United States emergency departments.美国急诊科中抗高血压药物用于中风治疗的情况。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Nov 6;1(6):1467-1471. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12312. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.老年人停用抗高血压药物
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 10;6(6):CD012572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012572.pub2.
7
Antihypertensive therapy in acute ischemic stroke: where do we stand?急性缺血性脑卒中的降压治疗:我们处于什么位置?
J Hum Hypertens. 2018 Dec;32(12):799-807. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0105-7. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.收缩压降低与心血管疾病和死亡风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):775-781. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1421.
2
Blood pressure reduction in acute ischemic stroke according to time to treatment: a subgroup analysis of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial.急性缺血性卒中按治疗时间分层的血压降低情况:中国急性缺血性卒中降压试验的亚组分析
J Hypertens. 2017 Jun;35(6):1244-1251. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001288.
3
Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1980 - 2015年全球、区域和国家249种死因的预期寿命、全死因死亡率和死因别死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.
4
Early Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Various Severities: A Subgroup Analysis of the CATIS Trial.不同严重程度急性缺血性卒中的早期血压降低:CATIS试验的亚组分析
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(3-4):186-95. doi: 10.1159/000444722. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Blood Pressure in Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中的血压
J Clin Neurol. 2016 Apr;12(2):137-46. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2016.12.2.137. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降压预防心血管疾病和死亡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
7
Effects of Blood Pressure and Blood Pressure-Lowering Treatment During the First 24 Hours Among Patients in the Third International Stroke Trial of Thrombolytic Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗第三次国际卒中试验中患者最初24小时内血压及降压治疗的影响
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3362-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010319. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Effect of Hyperacute Administration (Within 6 Hours) of Transdermal Glyceryl Trinitrate, a Nitric Oxide Donor, on Outcome After Stroke: Subgroup Analysis of the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) Trial.一氧化氮供体硝酸甘油经皮超急性给药(6小时内)对卒中后结局的影响:一氧化氮在卒中治疗中的疗效(ENOS)试验的亚组分析
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3194-201. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009647. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
9
Effect of Blood Pressure Lowering in Early Ischemic Stroke: Meta-Analysis.降压治疗对早期缺血性脑卒中的影响:荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):1883-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009552. Epub 2015 May 28.
10
Efficacy of nitric oxide, with or without continuing antihypertensive treatment, for management of high blood pressure in acute stroke (ENOS): a partial-factorial randomised controlled trial.一氧化氮(不论是否同时继续降压治疗)治疗急性脑卒中高血压的疗效(ENOS):一项部分析因随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):617-628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61121-1. Epub 2014 Oct 21.