Suppr超能文献

基于足迹家族的中国可持续发展的时空动态分析。

Spatio-Temporal Dynamic Analysis of Sustainable Development in China Based on the Footprint Family.

机构信息

Division of Student Affairs, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China.

School of Resource and Environment, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;15(2):246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020246.

Abstract

The existing index systems on sustainable evaluation are mostly based on a multi index comprehensive evaluation method. The main disadvantage of this approach is that the selection and assignment of evaluation indexes are greatly influenced by subjective factors, which can result in poor comparability of results. By contrast, the Footprint Family (including ecological footprint, carbon footprint, and water footprint) is not affected by subjective factors. The Footprint Family also covers the basic tenets of sustainable development. This paper proposes use of a sustainable development evaluation index system based on the principle of the Footprint Family, and including the ecological pressure index (), the ecological occupancy index (), the ecological economic coordination index (), the GHG (Greenhouse Gas) emission index (), the water resources stress index (), and the sustainable development index (). Furthermore, a standard for grading the evaluated results based on global benchmarks is formulated. The results of an empirical study in China were the following. The development situation deteriorated from 1990 to 2015. The results showed that the decreased from a medium level (grade 5) to a lower-medium level (grade 4). The results of this empirical study also showed that the method of evaluation can avoid the influence of subjective factors and can be used in the evaluation of sustainable development for various temporal and spatial conditions.

摘要

现有的可持续性评估指标体系大多基于多指标综合评价方法。这种方法的主要缺点是评估指标的选择和赋值受到主观因素的极大影响,导致结果的可比性较差。相比之下,足迹家族(包括生态足迹、碳足迹和水足迹)不受主观因素的影响。足迹家族还涵盖了可持续发展的基本宗旨。本文提出了基于足迹家族原理的可持续发展评估指标体系,包括生态压力指数()、生态占用指数()、生态经济协调指数()、温室气体(GHG)排放指数()、水资源压力指数()和可持续发展指数()。此外,还制定了基于全球基准的评估结果分级标准。对中国的实证研究结果如下。从 1990 年到 2015 年,发展状况恶化。结果表明,从中等水平(等级 5)下降到中下水平(等级 4)。这项实证研究的结果还表明,该评价方法可以避免主观因素的影响,可用于各种时空条件下的可持续发展评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/777e/5858315/578d606c7725/ijerph-15-00246-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验