• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术病理学中额外组织切片的效用

Utility of Additional Tissue Sections in Surgical Pathology.

作者信息

Hamza Ameer, Alrajjal Ahmed, Edens Jacob, Khawar Sidrah, Khurram Muhammad Siddique, Szpunar Susanna, Bonnett Michelle

机构信息

1 St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Int J Surg Pathol. 2018 Aug;26(5):392-401. doi: 10.1177/1066896918755008. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1177/1066896918755008
PMID:29390920
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To avoid diagnostic errors such as missed diagnosis and errors in staging tumors due to inadequate tissue sampling, pathologists submit additional sections (AS).

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed frequency, diagnostic yield, distribution, and cost of AS.

METHOD

Among 1542 AS cases, we calculated mean AS per case; fraction of AS that altered diagnosis or stage; AS variation by tissue, malignant versus benign lesions, presence or absence of neoadjuvant therapy, mass, margin, lymph nodes, or other source, resident versus pathologist assistant (PA) dissector; and AS cost per case.

RESULTS

Overall 9.2 ± 8.8 AS were collected per case. In only 3.8% (58/1542) of cases AS altered diagnosis or stage. Urinary bladder cases provoked the most AS: 19.5 ± 15.1 per case. Significantly more AS came from malignant versus benign lesions (10.8 ± 9.7 vs 7.6 ± 7.5, P = <.0001) and from specimens treated with neoadjuvant therapy versus malignant lesions not so treated (12.3 ± 9.4 vs 10.3 ± 9.8, P = .02). Lymph nodes were sampled more heavily compared with mass, margin, and other sites combined (11.8 ± 11.4 vs 8.9 ± 8.4, P = .003), but in 78.4% (1209/1542) of cases, AS were from mass. Of diagnosis or stage altering AS cases, two thirds (38/58) were from masses, one fifth (11/58) from lymph nodes, a 10th (6/58) from margins, and a 20th (3/58) from other specimen sites. Resident versus pathologist assistant dissection caused no significant AS difference. AS contributed 40% cost per case.

CONCLUSIONS

AS per case ranged widely; their diagnostic yield was low; they were highest in urinary bladder specimens, in malignant and particularly neoadjuvant-treated lesions. Although lymph nodes were most heavily sampled, most AS were from masses. Resident dissection did not increase AS and cost of AS was high.

摘要

背景

为避免因组织取样不足导致漏诊及肿瘤分期错误等诊断失误,病理学家会提交额外切片(AS)。

目的

本研究评估了AS的频率、诊断价值、分布及成本。

方法

在1542例AS病例中,我们计算了每例的平均AS数量;改变诊断或分期的AS比例;按组织、恶性与良性病变、是否接受新辅助治疗、肿块、切缘、淋巴结或其他来源、住院医师与病理科助理(PA)解剖者分类的AS差异;以及每例的AS成本。

结果

每例总体收集9.2±8.8张AS切片。仅3.8%(58/1542)的病例中AS改变了诊断或分期。膀胱病例引发的AS最多:每例19.5±15.1张。恶性病变比良性病变产生的AS显著更多(10.8±9.7对7.6±7.5,P =<.0001),接受新辅助治疗的标本比未接受新辅助治疗的恶性病变产生的AS更多(12.3±9.4对10.3±9.8,P =.02)。与肿块、切缘及其他部位总和相比,淋巴结的取样更密集(11.8±11.4对8.9±8.4,P =.003),但在78.4%(1209/1542)的病例中,AS来自肿块。在改变诊断或分期的AS病例中,三分之二(38/58)来自肿块,五分之一(11/58)来自淋巴结,十分之一(6/58)来自切缘,二十分之一(3/58)来自其他标本部位。住院医师与病理科助理解剖导致的AS差异无统计学意义。AS占每例成本的40%。

结论

每例的AS数量差异很大;其诊断价值较低;在膀胱标本、恶性病变尤其是接受新辅助治疗的病变中AS数量最多。虽然淋巴结取样最密集,但大多数AS来自肿块。住院医师解剖并未增加AS数量,且AS成本较高。

相似文献

1
Utility of Additional Tissue Sections in Surgical Pathology.手术病理学中额外组织切片的效用
Int J Surg Pathol. 2018 Aug;26(5):392-401. doi: 10.1177/1066896918755008. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
The impact of complete embedding of remaining tissue in gynecological lymph node dissection specimen in surgical pathology on lymph node yield: is it clinically relevant?在外科病理学中,将剩余组织完全嵌入妇科淋巴结解剖标本对淋巴结产量的影响:这在临床上是否相关?
Virchows Arch. 2018 Aug;473(2):183-188. doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2363-8. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
3
Better retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal resection specimens by pathologists' assistants.病理助手可提高结直肠切除标本中淋巴结的检出率。
J Clin Pathol. 2013 Jan;66(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201089. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
4
Second Opinion Expert Pathology Review in Bladder Cancer: Implications for Patient Care.膀胱癌的二次专家病理评估:对患者护理的影响
Int J Surg Pathol. 2018 Feb;26(1):12-17. doi: 10.1177/1066896917730903. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
5
Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Specimens: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Fixatives.新辅助放化疗后直肠癌标本淋巴结检出量:两种固定剂的随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Aug;61(8):888-896. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001097.
6
A comparison of formalin and GEWF in fixation of colorectal carcinoma specimens: rates of lymph node retrieval and effect on TNM staging.福尔马林与基因组增强型无甲醛固定剂(GEWF)对结直肠癌标本固定的比较:淋巴结获取率及对TNM分期的影响
J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jun;69(6):511-7. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203281. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Neck dissections: emerging role of oral pathologists.颈部清扫术:口腔病理学家的新作用
J Exp Ther Oncol. 2016 Nov;11(4):275-284.
8
Standardized grossing protocol is useful for the pathology reporting of malignant neoplasms other than adenocarcinomas treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy.标准化取材方案对于胰十二指肠切除术后治疗的非腺癌恶性肿瘤的病理报告很有用。
Histol Histopathol. 2017 Feb;32(2):177-192. doi: 10.14670/HH-11-781. Epub 2016 May 16.
9
Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens.影响结直肠癌标本中获取淋巴结数量的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2142-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9414-6. Epub 2007 May 24.
10
Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌分期中外科医生与病理学家之间的差异
Minerva Chir. 2006 Oct;61(5):385-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary pulmonary undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (PPUPS).原发性肺未分化多形性肉瘤(PPUPS)。
Autops Case Rep. 2019 Aug 22;9(3):e2019110. doi: 10.4322/acr.2019.110. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
2
Factors affecting the concordance of radiologic and pathologic tumor size in breast carcinoma.影响乳腺癌放射学与病理学肿瘤大小一致性的因素。
Ultrasound. 2019 Feb;27(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/1742271X18804278. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
3
Role of "Second Look" Lymph Node Search in Harvesting Optimal Number of Lymph Nodes for Staging of Colorectal Carcinoma.“二次探查”淋巴结搜索在获取用于结直肠癌分期的最佳淋巴结数量中的作用。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Apr 2;2018:1985031. doi: 10.1155/2018/1985031. eCollection 2018.