University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Madison, WI, United States.
Duke University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Durham, NC, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;626:507-518. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
In many developing regions with poor air quality, the use of air filtration devices to clean indoor air is growing rapidly. In this study, we collected indoor, outdoor and personal exposure filter-based samples of fine particulate matter (PM) with both properly operating, and sham air cleaners in six Beijing residences from July 24th to August 17th, 2016. Mass concentrations of PM and several health relevant components of PM including organic carbon, elemental carbon, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and 21 selected metals, were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of air cleaners. The effect of air purification on PM reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity, a metric of the oxidative potential of the aerosol, was also evaluated. The average indoor PM concentration during true filtration was 8.47μg/m, compared to 49.0μg/m during sham filtration; thus, air cleaners can significantly reduce the indoor PM concentration to well below WHO guideline levels and significantly lower all major components of PM. However, the utility of air cleaners in reducing overall personal exposure to PM and its components was marginal in this study: the average personal exposure PM concentration was 67.8 and 51.1μg/m during true and sham filtration respectively, and it is likely due to the activity patterns of the subjects. Short-term exposure contributions from environments with high PM concentrations, including exposure to traffic related emissions as well as uncharacterized indoor microenvironments, likely add substantially to the total PM exposure burden. The toxicity assay indicates that the air cleaners can also significantly reduce ROS activity in the indoor environment; however, this decrease did not translate to a reduction in personal exposure. Elemental carbon, lead, and arsenic were well-correlated with the ROS activity, thus adding to the knowledge base of drivers for ROS activity.
在空气质量较差的许多发展中地区,使用空气过滤设备来净化室内空气的做法正在迅速普及。在这项研究中,我们于 2016 年 7 月 24 日至 8 月 17 日,在北京市的 6 处住所中,采集了在空气净化器正常运行和假运行两种情况下,基于细颗粒物(PM)的室内、室外和个人暴露过滤器样本。对 PM 的质量浓度和包括有机碳、元素碳、硫酸盐、硝酸盐、铵和 21 种选定金属在内的几种与健康相关的 PM 成分进行了分析,以评估空气净化器的有效性。还评估了空气净化对 PM 活性氧物质(ROS)活性的影响,ROS 活性是气溶胶氧化性的衡量标准。在真正过滤期间,室内 PM 浓度的平均值为 8.47μg/m,而在假过滤期间为 49.0μg/m,因此空气净化器可以显著降低室内 PM 浓度,使其远低于世卫组织指导值,并显著降低 PM 的所有主要成分。然而,在这项研究中,空气净化器在降低个人整体 PM 及其成分的暴露量方面的作用微不足道:在真正和假运行期间,个人暴露 PM 浓度的平均值分别为 67.8μg/m 和 51.1μg/m,这可能是由于研究对象的活动模式所致。高 PM 浓度环境(包括交通相关排放以及未被描述的室内微环境)的短期暴露,可能会大大增加 PM 暴露量。毒性检测表明,空气净化器还可以显著降低室内环境中的 ROS 活性;然而,这一降低并没有转化为个人暴露的降低。元素碳、铅和砷与 ROS 活性密切相关,从而增加了 ROS 活性的驱动因素知识库。