• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进心胸外科医生的立法重点:胸外科医生协会政治行动委员会。

Advancing the Legislative Priorities of Cardiothoracic Surgeons: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Political Action Committee.

机构信息

University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar;105(3):691-695. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.061. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.061
PMID:29397100
Abstract

In the late 1990s, several federal government health policy decisions threatened the viability of thoracic surgery as a specialty. To respond to such decisions, active participation in political processes was given extremely high priority by the Executive Committee of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Creation of the STS Political Action Committee (STS-PAC) in 1997 was a part of the platform of participation. The purpose of the STS-PAC is to enhance the Society's voice and stature in health care policymaking. Although the STS-PAC receives voluntary contributions from STS members, on average, only 10% of STS members contribute to the STS-PAC. For the 2015-2016 election cycle, there were 542 contributors to the STS-PAC totaling $273,000. An annual contribution of $100 from every STS member would put the STS-PAC into the top 10 for medical PACs (whereas currently it is ranked 22nd of 28 in the group of physician and dental association PACs). Despite the relatively small dollar amount the STS-PAC directs, its strategic disbursement of these dollars has yielded impressive results. For example, the STS-PAC was able to use its influence to effectively stop the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from implementing a potentially calamitous rule that would effectively end traditional global surgical payments. Other advocacy successes include providing guidance to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in developing the national coverage determination for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and structuring its complex reimbursement schedule, and ensuring that a provision was included in the bill that would give the STS National Database access to claims data. The STS-PAC is a principal component of the STS' advocacy armamentarium. Despite the many successes of the STS-PAC, with even modest contributions by more STS members, the STS-PAC could become a leading medical PAC, and would give the STS an even stronger presence and voice in Washington, DC. Clearly, contributing to the STS-PAC provides STS members the opportunity to have a voice and an impact on health policy and the care of their patients.

摘要

20 世纪 90 年代末,几项联邦政府卫生政策决策威胁到胸外科作为一个专业的生存能力。为了应对这些决策,胸外科医师学会(STS)执行委员会将积极参与政治进程列为重中之重。STS 政治行动委员会(STS-PAC)于 1997 年成立,是参与平台的一部分。STS-PAC 的目的是增强学会在医疗保健决策中的声音和地位。尽管 STS-PAC 收到 STS 成员的自愿捐款,但平均只有 10%的 STS 成员捐款给 STS-PAC。在 2015-2016 年选举周期中,STS-PAC 有 542 名捐款人,总计 273,000 美元。如果每位 STS 成员每年捐款 100 美元,STS-PAC 将进入医疗 PAC 前 10 名(而目前它在医师和牙医协会 PAC 组中排名第 22 位)。尽管 STS-PAC 指导的金额相对较小,但它对这些资金的战略分配产生了令人印象深刻的结果。例如,STS-PAC 能够利用其影响力有效地阻止医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心实施一项潜在灾难性的规则,该规则将有效地结束传统的全球手术支付。其他宣传成功案例包括为医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心制定经导管主动脉瓣置换术的国家覆盖范围决定以及构建其复杂的报销时间表提供指导,并确保在法案中包含一项规定,使 STS 国家数据库能够访问索赔数据。STS-PAC 是 STS 倡导武器库的主要组成部分。尽管 STS-PAC 取得了许多成功,甚至更多的 STS 成员的适度贡献,STS-PAC 可以成为一个领先的医疗 PAC,并使 STS 在华盛顿特区拥有更强大的存在和声音。显然,向 STS-PAC 捐款使 STS 成员有机会对卫生政策和患者护理发表意见并产生影响。

相似文献

1
Advancing the Legislative Priorities of Cardiothoracic Surgeons: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Political Action Committee.推进心胸外科医生的立法重点:胸外科医生协会政治行动委员会。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar;105(3):691-695. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.061. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
Health Care Lobbying, Political Action Committees, and Spine Surgery.医疗保健游说、政治行动委员会与脊柱外科
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Dec 15;45(24):1736-1742. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003693.
3
Contributions to the Neurosurgery Political Action Committee (NeurosurgeryPAC): A Historical Perspective.对神经外科学政治行动委员会(NeurosurgeryPAC)的贡献:历史视角。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;135:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.082. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Health Policy Views and Political Advocacy of Arthroplasty Surgeons: A Survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members.关节置换外科医生的健康政策观点和政治倡导:对美国髋关节和膝关节外科医生协会会员的调查。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Aug;38(8):1423-1428.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
5
American Geriatrics Society Policy Priorities for New Administration and 115th Congress.美国老年医学会针对新政府及第115届国会的政策重点。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Mar;65(3):466-469. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14854. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
6
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2019 Update on Research.美国胸外科协会胸外科数据库:2019 年研究更新。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov;108(5):1293-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Variation in Pulmonary Resection Practices Between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Databases.胸外科医师协会与欧洲胸外科医师协会普通胸外科数据库之间肺切除术实践的差异。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;101(6):2077-84. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.073. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
8
The Orthopaedic Political Action Committee: Growth and Influence Over 20 Years.《矫形外科学政治行动委员会:20 多年的发展与影响》
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 15;28(14):563-569. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00823.
9
Penetration, Completeness, and Representativeness of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database for Lobectomy.胸腔外科医师学会普通胸腔外科数据库在肺叶切除术中的渗透度、完整性和代表性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar;107(3):897-902. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.059. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
10
Thoracic Surgery Workforce: report of STS/AATS Thoracic Surgery Practice and Access Task Force--Snapshot 2010.胸外科劳动力:STS/AATS 胸外科实践和准入工作组报告——2010 年快照。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jan;93(1):348-55, 355.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.036.

引用本文的文献

1
An Observational Study of Political Contributions by Self-Described Otolaryngologists in the United States.美国自称耳鼻喉科医生的政治捐款情况观察研究。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 May 14;10(3):e70144. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70144. eCollection 2025 Jun.