Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Apr;101(4):3110-3117. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13560. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of feeding a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement or a calcium salts of palm fatty acid (FA) supplement on nutrient digestibility and production responses of mid-lactation dairy cows. Fifteen Holstein cows (139 ± 39 d in milk) were randomly assigned to treatment sequence in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. Treatments were a control diet (CON; no fat supplement) and 1.5% of FA added either as a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement (PA-TG) or as calcium salts of palm FA supplement (Ca-FA). Fat-supplemented treatments did not affect dry matter intake (DMI) compared with CON, but Ca-FA reduced DMI compared with PA-TG. Compared with CON, fat-supplemented treatments increased 18-carbon FA digestibility by 2.0 percentage units but did not affect digestibility of total FA or 16-carbon FA. Compared with Ca-FA, PA-TG reduced total FA digestibility by 8.7 percentage units due to a decrease in 16-carbon FA digestibility (21.7 percentage units). Both fat supplements increased neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility compared with CON (3.90 percentage units), and PA-TG tended to increase NDF digestibility by 1.60 percentage units compared with Ca-FA. Compared with CON, fat-supplemented treatments increased milk yield (1.05 kg/d), 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield (2.20 kg/d), and energy-corrected milk yield (1.80 kg/d). Also, PA-TG increased milk fat yield (50 g/d) and milk energy output (1.0 Mcal/d) and tended to increase milk fat content (0.07 percentage units) and energy-corrected milk yield (1.0 kg/d) compared with Ca-FA. Fat-supplemented treatments reduced the yield of de novo milk FA (23 g/d) and increased the yields of mixed (43 g/d) and preformed (52 g/d) milk FA compared with CON. The PA-TG treatment increased the yield of 16-carbon (66 g/d) milk FA compared with Ca-FA, whereas Ca-FA increased the yield of preformed (60 g/d) milk FA. Fat-supplemented treatments increased intake of net energy for lactation by 1.80 Mcal/d, milk energy output by 1.30 Mcal/d, and energy in body reserves by 0.30 Mcal/d compared with CON. The Ca-FA treatment increased energy allocated to body reserves (0.60 Mcal/d), energy partitioning toward body reserves (1.20 percentage units), and body condition score change (0.06 units), and tended to increase body weight change (0.16 kg/d) and body condition score (0.08 units) compared with PA-TG. In conclusion, feeding a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement increased milk energy output due to increased yields of milk and milk fat, whereas feeding a calcium salts of palm FA supplement increased FA digestibility and energy partitioned to body reserves.
我们的研究目的是评估富含棕榈酸的甘油三酯补充剂或棕榈酸钙盐(FA)补充剂对泌乳中期奶牛的养分消化率和生产性能的影响。15 头荷斯坦奶牛(泌乳 139 ± 39 天)随机分配到 3 × 3 拉丁方设计的处理顺序中。处理为对照日粮(CON;无脂肪补充)和以富含棕榈酸的甘油三酯补充剂(PA-TG)或棕榈酸钙盐(Ca-FA)形式添加的 1.5% FA。与 CON 相比,脂肪补充剂处理并没有影响干物质采食量(DMI),但 Ca-FA 降低了 DMI 与 PA-TG 相比。与 CON 相比,脂肪补充剂处理增加了 18 碳 FA 的消化率 2.0 个百分点,但不影响总 FA 或 16 碳 FA 的消化率。与 Ca-FA 相比,PA-TG 降低了总 FA 的消化率 8.7 个百分点,这是由于 16 碳 FA 的消化率降低了 21.7 个百分点。两种脂肪补充剂都提高了中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的消化率,与 CON 相比提高了 3.90 个百分点(3.90 个百分点),PA-TG 与 Ca-FA 相比,NDF 的消化率提高了 1.60 个百分点。与 CON 相比,脂肪补充剂处理增加了牛奶产量(1.05 kg/d)、3.5%校正乳产量(2.20 kg/d)和能量校正乳产量(1.80 kg/d)。此外,PA-TG 增加了乳脂产量(50 g/d)和乳能产量(1.0 Mcal/d),并倾向于增加乳脂含量(0.07 个百分点)和能量校正乳产量(1.0 kg/d)与 Ca-FA 相比。脂肪补充剂处理降低了从头合成乳 FA 的产量(23 g/d),增加了混合乳 FA(43 g/d)和预成乳 FA(52 g/d)的产量与 CON 相比。PA-TG 处理增加了 16 碳乳 FA 的产量(66 g/d)与 Ca-FA 相比,而 Ca-FA 增加了预成乳 FA 的产量(60 g/d)。与 CON 相比,脂肪补充剂处理增加了泌乳净能摄入量 1.80 Mcal/d、乳能产量 1.30 Mcal/d 和体储备能量 0.30 Mcal/d。与 PA-TG 相比,Ca-FA 处理增加了体储备能量分配(0.60 Mcal/d)、体储备能量分配比例(1.20 个百分点)和体况评分变化(0.06 个单位),并倾向于增加体重变化(0.16 kg/d)和体况评分(0.08 个单位)。总之,添加富含棕榈酸的甘油三酯补充剂增加了牛奶能量输出,这是由于牛奶和牛奶脂肪产量增加所致,而添加棕榈酸钙盐补充剂增加了 FA 消化率和分配给体储备的能量。