Suppr超能文献

[内镜手术与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的对比研究]

[A comparative study of endoscopic and traditional open surgery in the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma].

作者信息

Zhao Q Z, Wang Y, Wang P

机构信息

Department of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 1;56(2):135-138. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.02.011.

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic thyroidectomy in the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma through clinical follow-up. Patients who underwent total thyroidectomy and had a final pathologic diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma at Department of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between February 2013 and April 2014 were enrolled in this study; those who had family history of thyroid cancer or a history of radiation of the neck area were excluded. There were 78 male and 228 female pantients, aging from 20 to 77 years with an age of (45.6±12.7) years. The patients were then divided into two groups: endoscopic surgery group (=48) and traditional open surgery group (=258). The clinical and pathological features and long-term follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The differences in surgical trauma, completeness, postoperative complications, and recurrence and metastasis risks between the two groups were compared by test, rank-sum test, χ(2) test or Fisher exact test. Compared to open surgery, endoscopic thyroidectomy had significant longer surgical time ((3.2±0.6) hours . (1.6±0.5) hours, =17.904, =0.000), two cases converted to open surgery because of tumor invasion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, and one because of a false negative cell biology preopertively. The two groups showed no significant difference in surgical trauma which was measured by bleeding, white blood cell, C reactive protein, drainage, and et al. During follow up, the two groups had no significant difference in rate of Tg<1 μg/L (97.9% . 91.9%, =0.220). Recurrent rate showed no significant difference (4.1% in endoscopic group . 3.1% in open group, =0.665) between the two groups after follow-up of (40.8±4.7) months. Recurrent time were either not significantly different ((23.5±21.9) months . (20.0±14.6) months, =0.785) between the two groups. Compared with conventional open thyroidecomy, endoscopic thyroidectomy has the same safety, surgical completeness and long-term therapeutic effect.

摘要

通过临床随访评估内镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的可行性、安全性和有效性。选取2013年2月至2014年4月在浙江大学医学院附属第二医院甲状腺外科接受全甲状腺切除术且最终病理诊断为甲状腺乳头状癌的患者;排除有甲状腺癌家族史或颈部放疗史的患者。共有78例男性和228例女性患者,年龄20至77岁,平均年龄(45.6±12.7)岁。患者随后被分为两组:内镜手术组(=48)和传统开放手术组(=258)。收集并分析临床和病理特征以及长期随访数据。通过t检验、秩和检验、χ²检验或Fisher确切检验比较两组在手术创伤、完整性、术后并发症以及复发和转移风险方面的差异。与开放手术相比,内镜甲状腺切除术的手术时间明显更长((3.2±0.6)小时对(1.6±0.5)小时,t = 17.904,P = 0.000),2例因肿瘤侵犯喉返神经转为开放手术,1例因术前细胞生物学假阴性转为开放手术。两组在以出血、白细胞、C反应蛋白、引流量等衡量的手术创伤方面无显著差异。随访期间,两组Tg<1μg/L的比例无显著差异(97.9%对91.9%,P = 0.220)。随访(40.8±4.7)个月后,两组的复发率无显著差异(内镜组4.1%对开放组3.1%,P = 0.665)。两组的复发时间也无显著差异((23.5±21.9)个月对(20.0±14.6)个月,P = 0.785)。与传统开放甲状腺切除术相比,内镜甲状腺切除术具有相同的安全性、手术完整性和长期治疗效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验