a Neuromuscular Assessment Laboratory, Physical Education School , Federal University of Pelotas , Pelotas , Brazil.
J Sports Sci. 2018 Sep;36(18):2053-2060. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1435967. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
The present study compared the energy expenditure (EE) during and after two water aerobics protocols, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate continuous training (CONT). A crossover randomized design was employed comprising 11 healthy young women. HIIT consisted of eight 20s bouts at 130% of the cadence associated with the maximal oxygen consumption (measured in the aquatic environment) with 10s passive rest. CONT corresponded to 30 min at a heart rate equivalent to 90-95% of the second ventilatory threshold. EE was measured during and 30 min before and after the protocols and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) was calculated. Total EE during session was higher in CONT (227.62 ± 31.69 kcal) compared to HIIT (39.91 ± 4.24 kcal), while EE per minute was greater in HIIT (9.98 ± 1.06 kcal) than in CONT (7.58 ± 1.07 kcal). Post-exercise EE (64.48 ± 3.50 vs. 63.65 ± 10.39 kcal) and EPOC (22.53 ± 4.98 vs.22.10 ± 8.00 kcal) were not different between HIIT and CONT, respectively. Additionally, oxygen uptake had already returned to baseline fifteen minutes post-exercise. These suggest that a water aerobics CONT session results in post-exercise EE and EPOC comparable to HIIT despite the latter supramaximal nature. Still, CONT results in higher total EE.
本研究比较了两种水上有氧运动方案(高强度间歇训练[HIIT]和中等持续训练[CONT])过程中和之后的能量消耗(EE)。采用交叉随机设计,共纳入 11 名健康年轻女性。HIIT 由 8 个 20 秒的阶段组成,每个阶段的节奏为与最大摄氧量(在水环境中测量)相关的 130%,期间有 10 秒的被动休息。CONT 对应于以 90-95%第二通气阈心率持续 30 分钟。在方案进行期间和进行前 30 分钟及之后测量 EE,并计算运动后过量耗氧量(EPOC)。CONT 方案期间的总 EE(227.62±31.69kcal)明显高于 HIIT(39.91±4.24kcal),而 HIIT 方案期间的 EE 每分钟(9.98±1.06kcal)高于 CONT(7.58±1.07kcal)。HIIT 和 CONT 方案的运动后 EE(64.48±3.50 与 63.65±10.39kcal)和 EPOC(22.53±4.98 与 22.10±8.00kcal)均无差异。此外,运动后 15 分钟,摄氧量已恢复至基线水平。这些表明,尽管 HIIT 具有超最大性质,但 CONT 水上有氧运动方案产生的运动后 EE 和 EPOC 与 HIIT 相当。尽管如此,CONT 方案仍会产生更高的总 EE。