Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Emergency, Porto Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Shock. 2019 Feb;51(2):247-255. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001113.
Potassium-(K)-channel inhibitors may increase systemic vascular resistance in vasodilatory shock states.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the macro- and microvascular effects of the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K-channel-(KATP)-inhibitor glipizide and the nonselective K-channel inhibitor tetraethylammonium (TEA) in ovine endotoxemic shock and septic shock in rats.
Two randomized, controlled laboratory studies.
Thirty female sheep and 40 male Sprague Dawley rats.
Animal research facility INTERVENTION:: Systemic hemodynamics were analyzed in ovine endotoxemic shock with guideline-oriented supportive therapy. Sheep were allocated to three treatment groups for 12 h: glipizide 10 mg kg·h, TEA 8 mg kg·h, or 0.9% saline. The microvascular effects of each drug were evaluated in septic rats (cecal ligation and puncture model) receiving a 2-h infusion of each study drug: glipizide 20 mg kg·h; TEA 50 mg kg·h, or 0.9% saline, respectively, followed by intravital microscopy of villi microcirculation.
Compared with the control group, glipizide infusion increased systemic vascular resistance index and decreased cardiac index and heart rate (HR) in sheep (P < 0.05), whereas TEA infusion decreased HR and resulted in a decreased survival time (P = 0.001). In rats, glipizide infusion resulted in an increase in mean arterial pressure and a decrease in HR compared with baseline measurement (P < 0.05) without relevant effects on the villi microcirculation. TEA decreased HR and decreased capillary perfusion of the villi microcirculation compared with the sham group (P = 0.002).
Selective inhibition of KATP-channels in ovine endotoxemic shock with glipizide partially restored vasomotor tone without exerting harmful effects on intestinal microcirculation in septic shock in rats. On the contrary, nonselective K-channel inhibition with TEA showed deleterious effects in both models, including impaired microcirculation and decreased survival time. Future research on glipizide in vasodilatory shock may be warranted.
钾通道(K)抑制剂可能会增加血管扩张性休克状态下的全身血管阻力。
本研究旨在比较三磷酸腺苷敏感性 K 通道(KATP)抑制剂格列吡嗪和非选择性 K 通道抑制剂四乙铵(TEA)在绵羊内毒素性休克和大鼠感染性休克中的宏观和微观血管作用。
两项随机对照的实验室研究。
30 只雌性绵羊和 40 只雄性 Sprague Dawley 大鼠。
动物研究设施。
采用指南导向的支持性治疗分析绵羊内毒素性休克的全身血流动力学。绵羊分为三组,接受 12 小时的治疗:格列吡嗪 10mg/kg·h、TEA 8mg/kg·h 或 0.9%生理盐水。每种药物的微血管作用在接受每种研究药物 2 小时输注的感染性大鼠(盲肠结扎和穿刺模型)中进行评估:格列吡嗪 20mg/kg·h;TEA 50mg/kg·h 或 0.9%生理盐水,然后进行绒毛微循环的活体显微镜检查。
与对照组相比,格列吡嗪输注增加了绵羊的全身血管阻力指数,降低了心指数和心率(HR)(P<0.05),而 TEA 输注降低了 HR,并导致存活时间缩短(P=0.001)。在大鼠中,与基础测量相比,格列吡嗪输注导致平均动脉压升高,HR 降低(P<0.05),但对绒毛微循环无相关影响。与假手术组相比,TEA 降低了 HR,并降低了绒毛微循环的毛细血管灌注(P=0.002)。
在绵羊内毒素性休克中选择性抑制 KATP 通道用格列吡嗪部分恢复了血管张力,而在大鼠感染性休克中对肠道微循环没有有害影响。相反,用 TEA 进行非选择性 K 通道抑制在两种模型中都显示出有害作用,包括微循环受损和存活时间缩短。在血管扩张性休克中进一步研究格列吡嗪可能是必要的。