Barden-O'Fallon Janine, Speizer Ilene S, Calhoun Lisa M, Corroon Meghan
Maternal & Child Health Department, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0529-9.
With the focus of global and national family planning initiatives on reaching "additional user" targets, it is increasingly important for programs to assess contraceptive method discontinuation and switching. This analysis calculated the discontinuation rate and method-specific discontinuation rates, examined reasons given for contraceptive discontinuation, and assessed characteristics associated with subsequent contraceptive switching and abandonment among women living in urban areas of Senegal.
Data came from the Measurement, Learning & Evaluation project's 2015 survey of 6927 women of reproductive age living in six urban sites (Dakar, Pikine, Guédiawaye, Mbao, Kaolack and Mbour). Information on contraceptive use and discontinuation for the five years preceding the survey were recorded in a monthly calendar. Single decrement life tables were used to calculate discontinuation rates. Descriptive analyses were used to assess reasons for discontinuation and method switching after discontinuation. A multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of being a non-user in-need of contraception, a non-user not in-need of contraception, or a method switcher in the month after discontinuation, by sociodemographic and other characteristics.
The 12-month discontinuation rate for all methods was 34.7%. Implants had the lowest one-year discontinuation rates (6.3%) followed by the intrauterine device (IUD) (18.4%) while higher rates were seen for daily pills (38%), injectables (32.7%), and condoms (62.9%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were reduced need (45.6%), method problems (30.1%), and becoming pregnant while using (10.0%). Only 17% of discontinuations were followed by use of another method; most often daily pills (5.2%) or injectables (4.2%). In the multivariate analysis, women with any formal education (primary, secondary or higher) were more than 50% more likely to switch methods than remain in need of contraception after discontinuation than women with no education or Koranic-only education (RRR = 1.59, p-value = 0.004; RRR = 1.55, p-value = 0.031). The likelihood of switching compared to being "in need" was also significantly higher for women who were married and who discontinued traditional methods.
To support increased contraceptive method use, women with no education and unmarried women are priorities for counseling and information about side effects and method switching at the time of method adoption.
随着全球和国家计划生育倡议聚焦于实现“新增使用者”目标,项目评估避孕方法的停用和更换变得愈发重要。本分析计算了停用率和特定方法的停用率,研究了避孕方法停用的原因,并评估了塞内加尔城市地区女性后续避孕方法更换和放弃使用避孕措施的相关特征。
数据来自测量、学习与评估项目2015年对居住在六个城市地点(达喀尔、皮金、盖迪亚韦、姆鲍、考拉克和姆布尔)的6927名育龄妇女的调查。在月度日历中记录了调查前五年的避孕使用和停用信息。使用单减生命表计算停用率。描述性分析用于评估停用原因和停产后的方法更换情况。多分类逻辑回归用于根据社会人口学和其他特征估计在停产后一个月成为需要避孕的非使用者、不需要避孕的非使用者或方法更换者的可能性。
所有方法的12个月停用率为34.7%。皮下埋植剂的一年停用率最低(6.3%),其次是宫内节育器(IUD)(18.4%),而每日口服避孕药(38%)、注射剂(32.7%)和避孕套(62.9%)的停用率较高。最常见的停用原因是需求减少(45.6%)、方法问题(30.1%)以及使用期间怀孕(10.0%)。只有17%的停用后会采用另一种方法;最常采用的是每日口服避孕药(5.2%)或注射剂(4.2%)。在多变量分析中,接受过任何正规教育(小学、中学或更高)的女性在停产后更换方法的可能性比仍需要避孕的可能性高出50%以上,高于未受过教育或仅接受过古兰经教育的女性(相对风险比RRR = 1.59,p值 = 0.004;RRR = 1.55,p值 = 0.031)。已婚且停用传统方法的女性更换方法的可能性与“有需求”相比也显著更高。
为支持增加避孕方法的使用,未受过教育的女性和未婚女性是在采用避孕方法时提供副作用及方法更换咨询和信息的重点对象。