• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用更新的 WHO 2016 标准重新评估急性髓系白血病中的红系优势。

A reevaluation of erythroid predominance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia using the updated WHO 2016 Criteria.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2018 Jun;31(6):873-880. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0001-2. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1038/s41379-018-0001-2
PMID:29403082
Abstract

The 2016 WHO update changed the diagnostic criteria for myeloid neoplasms with erythroid predominance, limiting the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia to cases with ≥20% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Although acute myeloid leukemia with ≥50% erythroid cells has historically been presumed to represent acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, this hypothesis has never been systematically examined. We sought to investigate the clinicopathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features of acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance to subclassify cases as defined by the 2016 WHO. We retrospectively identified patients with ≥50% erythroid precursors and either ≥20% bone marrow blasts or ≥20% peripheral blood blasts at the time of initial diagnosis at seven major academic centers. Laboratory and clinical data were obtained. Patients were then reclassified according to 2016 WHO guidelines. A matched control group was also obtained. We identified 146 patients with acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance (62% M, average age: 62 y, range: 5-93 y). Of these, 91 were acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, 20 (14%) were therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, 23 (16%) acute myeloid leukemia, not otherwise specified, and ten acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities. The bone marrow blast count ranged from 9-41%. There was no difference in survival for patients with erythroid predominance compared to patients with acute myeloid leukemia without erythroid proliferations. In a multivariable analysis, cytogenetic risk was the only significant predictor of survival. We find a significantly lower rate of FLT3 and RAS pathway alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance compared to controls. Our study is one of the first to apply the 2016 WHO guidelines for classification of acute myeloid leukemia. We find acute myeloid leukemia with erythroid predominance is a heterogeneous group and that erythroid richness has no impact on overall survival.

摘要

2016 年世卫组织更新改变了以红细胞为主的骨髓增生性肿瘤的诊断标准,将急性髓系白血病的诊断仅限于骨髓或外周血中≥20%的原始细胞。尽管历史上认为≥50%红细胞的急性髓系白血病代表伴有骨髓增生异常相关改变的急性髓系白血病,但这一假说从未得到系统研究。我们试图研究以红细胞为主的急性髓系白血病的临床病理、细胞遗传学和分子特征,根据 2016 年世卫组织的标准对病例进行分类。我们回顾性地确定了在七个主要学术中心初始诊断时≥50%原始细胞和/或≥20%骨髓原始细胞或≥20%外周血原始细胞的患者。获得了实验室和临床数据。然后根据 2016 年世卫组织指南对患者进行重新分类,并获得了匹配的对照组。我们共确定了 146 例以红细胞为主的急性髓系白血病患者(62%为男性,平均年龄 62 岁,范围为 5-93 岁)。其中 91 例为伴有骨髓增生异常相关改变的急性髓系白血病,20 例(14%)为治疗相关髓系肿瘤,23 例(16%)为未特指的急性髓系白血病,10 例为伴有复发性细胞遗传学/分子异常的急性髓系白血病。骨髓原始细胞计数范围为 9-41%。与无红细胞增生的急性髓系白血病患者相比,以红细胞为主的患者的生存无差异。在多变量分析中,细胞遗传学风险是生存的唯一显著预测因素。与对照组相比,以红细胞为主的急性髓系白血病中 FLT3 和 RAS 通路改变的发生率明显较低。我们的研究是首次应用 2016 年世卫组织急性髓系白血病分类标准的研究之一。我们发现以红细胞为主的急性髓系白血病是一组异质性疾病,红细胞丰富度对总生存率没有影响。

相似文献

1
A reevaluation of erythroid predominance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia using the updated WHO 2016 Criteria.采用更新的 WHO 2016 标准重新评估急性髓系白血病中的红系优势。
Mod Pathol. 2018 Jun;31(6):873-880. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0001-2. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
Acute erythroid leukemia as defined in the World Health Organization classification is a rare and pathogenetically heterogeneous disease.急性红细胞性白血病在世界卫生组织的分类中被定义为一种罕见且具有多种发病机制的疾病。
Mod Pathol. 2010 Aug;23(8):1113-26. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.96. Epub 2010 May 14.
3
Re-evaluation of acute erythroid leukemia according to the 2016 WHO classification.根据2016年世界卫生组织分类标准对急性红系白血病进行重新评估。
Leuk Res. 2017 Oct;61:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
4
Erythroid proliferations in myeloid neoplasms.髓系肿瘤中的红系增生。
Hum Pathol. 2012 Feb;43(2):153-64. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
5
Pure erythroid leukemia: a reassessment of the entity using the 2008 World Health Organization classification.纯红细胞白血病:采用 2008 年世界卫生组织分类对该实体的再评估。
Mod Pathol. 2011 Mar;24(3):375-83. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.194. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
6
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with erythroid predominance exhibits clinical and molecular characteristics that differ from other types of AML.伴红系前体细胞增多的急性髓细胞白血病(AML)具有不同于其他类型 AML 的临床和分子特征。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041485. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
7
Acute erythroid neoplastic proliferations. A biological study based on 62 patients.急性红系肿瘤增殖。一项基于62例患者的生物学研究。
Haematologica. 2002 Feb;87(2):148-53.
8
Classification of acute myeloid leukemia by the revised fourth edition World Health Organization criteria: a retrospective single-institution study with appraisal of the new entities of acute myeloid leukemia with gene mutations in NPM1 and biallelic CEBPA.采用修订版第四版世界卫生组织标准对急性髓系白血病进行分类:一项回顾性单机构研究,评估了具有 NPM1 和双等位 CEBPA 基因突变的急性髓系白血病新实体。
Hum Pathol. 2019 Aug;90:80-96. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 May 8.
9
Comparison of genetic and clinical aspects in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes all with more than 50% of bone marrow erythropoietic cells.比较骨髓中红系细胞比例超过 50%的急性髓系白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征患者的遗传和临床特征。
Haematologica. 2011 Sep;96(9):1284-92. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043687. Epub 2011 May 23.
10
To bi or not to bi: Acute erythroid leukemias and hematopoietic lineage choice.双系还是单系:急性红细胞性白血病和造血谱系选择。
Exp Hematol. 2021 May;97:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 16.