Fordyce W E, Brockway J A, Bergman J A, Spengler D
J Behav Med. 1986 Apr;9(2):127-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00848473.
Back-pain patients with onset in the preceding 1-10 days and comparable on a back examination were randomly assigned to traditional management (A regimen) and behavioral treatment methods (B regimen). Patients were compared at 6 weeks and 9-12 months on a set of "Sick/Well" scores derived from patient reported vocational status (V), health-care utilization (HCU), claimed impairment (CI), and pain drawings (D) and on two measures of activity level. No differences were found at 6 weeks, but at 9-12 months, A-group S's were more "sick." No A/B differences were found on activity-level measures. Group A S's showed significant increases in claimed impairment from preonset to follow-up, whereas Group B S's had returned at follow-up to preonset levels.
背痛发作时间在之前1至10天且背部检查结果相当的患者被随机分配到传统治疗组（A方案）和行为治疗组（B方案）。在6周以及9至12个月时，对患者基于患者报告的职业状况（V）、医疗保健利用情况（HCU）、声称的损伤（CI）和疼痛绘图（D）得出的一组“患病/健康”评分以及两项活动水平指标进行比较。6周时未发现差异，但在9至12个月时，A组患者更“患病”。在活动水平指标上未发现A/B组差异。A组患者从发病前到随访期间声称的损伤显著增加，而B组患者在随访时已恢复到发病前水平。
