Terzi Nicolas, Lofaso Frédéric, Masson Romain, Beuret Pascal, Normand Hervé, Dumanowski Edith, Falaize Line, Sauneuf Bertrand, Daubin Cédric, Brunet Jennifer, Annane Djillali, Parienti Jean-Jacques, Orlikowski David
INSERM, Université Grenoble-Alpes, U1042, HP2, 38000, Grenoble, France.
CHU Grenoble Alpes, Service de réanimation médicale, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Feb 5;8(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0360-3.
Identifying patients at high risk of post-extubation acute respiratory failure requiring respiratory or mechanical cough assistance remains challenging. Here, our primary aim was to evaluate the accuracy of easily collected parameters obtained before or just after extubation in predicting the risk of post-extubation acute respiratory failure requiring, at best, noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) and/or mechanical cough assistance and, at worst, reintubation after extubation.
We conducted a multicenter prospective, open-label, observational study from April 2012 through April 2015. Patients who passed a weaning test after at least 72 h of endotracheal mechanical ventilation (MV) were included. Just before extubation, spirometry and maximal pressures were measured by a technician. The results were not disclosed to the bedside physicians. Patients were followed until discharge or death.
Among 3458 patients admitted to the ICU, 730 received endotracheal MV for longer than 72 h and were then extubated; among these, 130 were included. At inclusion, the 130 patients had mean ICU stay and endotracheal MV durations both equal to 11 ± 4.2 days. After extubation, 36 patients required curative NIV, 7 both curative NIV and mechanical cough assistance, and 8 only mechanical cough assistance; 6 patients, all of whom first received NIV, required reintubation within 48 h. The group that required NIV after extubation had a significantly higher proportion of patients with chronic respiratory disease (P = 0.015), longer endotracheal MV duration at inclusion, and lower Medical Research Council (MRC) score (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, and P = 0.004, respectively). By multivariate analysis, forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak cough expiratory flow (PCEF) were independently associated with (NIV) and/or mechanical cough assistance and/or reintubation after extubation. Areas under the ROC curves for pre-extubation PCEF and FVC were 0.71 and 0.76, respectively.
In conclusion, FVC measured before extubation correlates closely with FVC after extubation and may serve as an objective predictor of post-extubation respiratory failure requiring NIV and/or mechanical cough assistance and/or reintubation in heterogeneous populations of medical ICU patients. ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT01564745.
识别拔管后发生急性呼吸衰竭且需要呼吸或机械咳嗽辅助的高危患者仍然具有挑战性。在此,我们的主要目的是评估在拔管前或刚拔管后获取的易于收集的参数在预测拔管后急性呼吸衰竭风险方面的准确性,这种风险最严重时需要无创机械通气(NIV)和/或机械咳嗽辅助,最轻微时需要拔管后重新插管。
我们在2012年4月至2015年4月期间进行了一项多中心前瞻性、开放标签、观察性研究。纳入至少接受72小时气管内机械通气(MV)后通过撤机测试的患者。在拔管前,由一名技术人员测量肺活量和最大压力。结果未告知床边医生。对患者进行随访直至出院或死亡。
在入住ICU的3458例患者中,730例接受气管内MV超过72小时,随后进行了拔管;其中130例被纳入研究。纳入时,这130例患者的平均ICU住院时间和气管内MV持续时间均为11±4.2天。拔管后,36例患者需要进行治疗性NIV,7例需要治疗性NIV和机械咳嗽辅助,8例仅需要机械咳嗽辅助;6例患者(均首先接受了NIV)在48小时内需要重新插管。拔管后需要NIV的组中,慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的比例显著更高(P = 0.015),纳入时气管内MV持续时间更长,且医学研究委员会(MRC)评分更低(分别为P = 0.02、P = 0.01和P = 0.004)。通过多变量分析,用力肺活量(FVC)和咳嗽峰值呼气流量(PCEF)与拔管后(NIV)和/或机械咳嗽辅助和/或重新插管独立相关。拔管前PCEF和FVC的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.71和0.76。
总之,拔管前测量的FVC与拔管后FVC密切相关,可作为医学ICU患者异质性群体中拔管后呼吸衰竭需要NIV和/或机械咳嗽辅助和/或重新插管的客观预测指标。ClinicalTrials.gov编号为#NCT01564745。