Willoughby Michael T, Blair Clancy B, Kuhn Laura J, Magnus Brooke E
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27704, USA.
Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jun;170:30-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Early childhood represents a period of rapid cognitive developmental change in executive function (EF) skills along with a variety of related cognitive processes, including processing speed. This leads to interpretational challenges in that children's performance on EF tasks reflects more than EF skills per se. We tested whether the inclusion of a brief measure of simple reaction time (SRT) during EF assessments could help to partially address this challenge. Data were drawn from a cross-sectional convenience sample of 830 preschool-aged children. Individual differences in SRT were significantly associated with performance on all tasks (Rs = .09-.26); slower performance on the SRT task was associated with poorer performance on each EF task. Age-related differences in individual EF tasks were reduced by approximately one half after accounting for age-related differences in SRT, and EF task scores were less coherent (i.e., less strongly intercorrelated with each other) after the removal of SRT. Age-related differences in EF were smaller (Cohen ds = 1.36 vs. 0.78), and poverty-related differences in EF were larger (Cohen ds = 0.30 vs. 0.46) after accounting for SRT-related variation. Finally, consistent with previous studies, SRT-related differences in fluid reasoning were mediated by EF skills. Results are discussed with respect to using a brief measure of SRT to partially address the problem of measurement impurity at the level of individual EF tasks.
幼儿期是执行功能(EF)技能以及包括处理速度在内的各种相关认知过程快速认知发展变化的时期。这导致了一些解释上的挑战,因为儿童在EF任务上的表现所反映的不仅仅是EF技能本身。我们测试了在EF评估中加入一项简单反应时间(SRT)的简短测量是否有助于部分应对这一挑战。数据来自830名学龄前儿童的横断面便利样本。SRT的个体差异与所有任务的表现显著相关(Rs = 0.09 - 0.26);SRT任务表现较慢与每项EF任务表现较差相关。在考虑了SRT的年龄相关差异后,个体EF任务中与年龄相关的差异减少了约一半,并且在去除SRT后,EF任务分数的一致性降低(即彼此之间的相关性减弱)。在考虑了与SRT相关的变异后,EF中与年龄相关的差异较小(Cohen d值 = 1.36对0.78),而EF中与贫困相关的差异较大(Cohen d值 = 0.30对0.46)。最后,与先前的研究一致,流体推理中与SRT相关的差异由EF技能介导。我们讨论了使用SRT的简短测量来部分解决个体EF任务层面测量不纯问题的结果。